• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字时代的领导团队:关于技术的四种观点及其对领导团队的意义。

Leading Teams in the Digital Age: Four Perspectives on Technology and What They Mean for Leading Teams.

作者信息

Larson Lindsay, DeChurch Leslie

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University.

出版信息

Leadersh Q. 2020 Feb;31(1). doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
PMID:32863679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7453931/
Abstract

Digital technologies are changing the nature of teamwork in ways that have important implications for leadership. Though conceptually rich and multi-disciplinary, much of the burgeoning work on technology has not been fully integrated into the leadership literature. To fill this gap, we organize existing work on leadership and technology, outlining four perspectives: (1) technology as context, (2) technology as sociomaterial, (3) technology as creation medium, and (4) technology as teammate. Each technology perspective makes assumptions about how technologies affect teams and the needs for team leadership. Within each perspective, we detail current work on leading teams. This section takes us from virtual teams to new vistas posed by leading online communities, crowds, peer production groups, flash teams, human-robot teams, and human-artificial intelligence teams. We identify 12 leadership implications arising from the ways digital technologies affect organizing. We then leverage our review to identify directions for future leadership research and practice.

摘要

数字技术正在改变团队合作的性质,这对领导力有着重要影响。尽管在概念上丰富且多学科,但许多新兴的技术相关工作尚未完全融入领导力文献。为填补这一空白,我们梳理了关于领导力与技术的现有工作,概述了四个视角:(1)技术作为背景,(2)技术作为社会物质,(3)技术作为创作媒介,以及(4)技术作为团队成员。每个技术视角都对技术如何影响团队以及团队领导力的需求做出了假设。在每个视角内,我们详细阐述了当前关于领导团队的工作。本节将我们从虚拟团队带到了领导在线社区、群体、对等生产小组、临时团队、人机团队和人类 - 人工智能团队所带来的新视野。我们确定了数字技术影响组织方式所产生的12个领导力影响。然后,我们利用我们的综述来确定未来领导力研究和实践的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e9/7453931/81ae8352b391/nihms-1549720-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e9/7453931/81ae8352b391/nihms-1549720-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7e9/7453931/81ae8352b391/nihms-1549720-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Leading Teams in the Digital Age: Four Perspectives on Technology and What They Mean for Leading Teams.数字时代的领导团队:关于技术的四种观点及其对领导团队的意义。
Leadersh Q. 2020 Feb;31(1). doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
3
Team models in neurorehabilitation: structure, function, and culture change.神经康复中的团队模式:结构、功能与文化变革。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(4):655-69. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141080.
4
Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre.通过 NASSS 框架理解人工智能在医疗保健组织和系统中的整合:在加拿大领先的学术中心进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):701. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x.
5
Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.领导虚拟团队:层级领导、结构支持和共享团队领导。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):390-403. doi: 10.1037/a0030264. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
Exploration of the nonlinear relationship between social support and the establishment of long-term doctor-patient relationships: An empirical analysis based on virtual doctor teams.探讨社会支持与建立长期医患关系之间的非线性关系:基于虚拟医生团队的实证分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105198. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
7
Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors.为数字转型准备工作场所:多层次因素的综合综述与框架
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;12:620766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766. eCollection 2021.
8
Interprofessional teamwork in healthcare: Observations and the road ahead.医疗保健中的跨专业团队合作:观察与未来之路。
J Interprof Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):338-345. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2090526. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
Team development among physician-leaders at the Cleveland Clinic.克利夫兰诊所内科主任之间的团队发展。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2018 May 8;31(2):210-225. doi: 10.1108/LHS-10-2017-0060. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Virtual Teams in Times of Pandemic: Factors That Influence Performance.疫情时期的虚拟团队:影响绩效的因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 17;12:624637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Diminishing returns of task-oriented interaction in digitally-mediated dynamic teams: evidence from amateur sports organizing.数字媒介动态团队中任务导向型互动的收益递减:来自业余体育组织的证据
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1548846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548846. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.团队合作中的人工社会智能:团队特质如何影响复杂任务中的人机动态。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 17;12:1487883. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1487883. eCollection 2025.
3
Nurses' perception of the nursing process and its relationship with leadership.

本文引用的文献

1
Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation.打破美国国家航空航天局的知识界限:职业身份在开放式创新中的关键作用。
Adm Sci Q. 2018 Dec;63(4):746-782. doi: 10.1177/0001839217747876. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
3
Watson will see you now: a supercomputer to help clinicians make informed treatment decisions.
护士对护理程序的认知及其与领导力的关系。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Apr 22;77(1):e20230371. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0371. eCollection 2024.
4
Enhancing team success in the neonatal intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for fluid teams.提高新生儿重症监护病房团队的成功率:流动团队面临的挑战与机遇
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 7;14:1284606. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1284606. eCollection 2023.
5
Effect of Employee Experience on Organizational Commitment: Case of South Korea.员工体验对组织承诺的影响:以韩国为例。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(7):521. doi: 10.3390/bs13070521.
6
Who should be first? How and when AI-human order influences procedural justice in a multistage decision-making process.谁应排在首位?人工智能与人的顺序如何以及何时影响多阶段决策过程中的程序正义。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 17;18(7):e0284840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284840. eCollection 2023.
7
Fostering Collective Intelligence in Human-AI Collaboration: Laying the Groundwork for COHUMAIN.在人机协作中培养集体智慧:为COHUMAIN奠定基础。
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):189-216. doi: 10.1111/tops.12679. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
Role of machine and organizational structure in science.机器和组织结构在科学中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272280. eCollection 2022.
9
Adoption of AI-Enabled Tools in Social Development Organizations in India: An Extension of UTAUT Model.人工智能支持的工具在印度社会发展组织中的应用:技术接受与使用整合理论模型的扩展
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:893691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893691. eCollection 2022.
10
Reimagining e-leadership for reconfigured virtual teams due to Covid-19.因新冠疫情对虚拟团队进行重新配置而对电子领导力的重新构想。
Int J Inf Manage. 2021 Oct;60:102381. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102381. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
华生现在可以为您服务了:一台帮助临床医生做出明智治疗决策的超级计算机。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Feb;19(1):31-2. doi: 10.1188/15.CJON.31-32.
4
Effectiveness of shared leadership in Wikipedia.维基百科中共享领导的有效性。
Hum Factors. 2013 Dec;55(6):1021-43. doi: 10.1177/0018720813515704.
5
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.共享领导与团队效能的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):181-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034531. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
6
Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.领导虚拟团队:层级领导、结构支持和共享团队领导。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):390-403. doi: 10.1037/a0030264. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
Innovation in globally distributed teams: the role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions.全球分布式团队中的创新:LMX、沟通频率以及成员影响力对团队决策的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1037/a0028958. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.元分析影响人机交互信任的因素。
Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):517-27. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254.
9
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head.互联网百科全书正面交锋。
Nature. 2005 Dec 15;438(7070):900-1. doi: 10.1038/438900a.
10
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.