• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders following inpatient detoxification.阿片类物质使用障碍患者住院戒毒后的药物治疗成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(11):526-531.
2
An alternative analysis of illicit opioid use during treatment in a randomized trial of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone: A per-protocol and completers analysis.在一项扩展释放纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮随机试验中治疗期间非法阿片类药物使用的另一种分析:按方案和完成者分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 1;219:108422. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108422. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.长效纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮预防阿片类药物复发的比较效果(X:BOT):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):309-318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32812-X. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
NIDA Clinical Trials Network CTN-0051, Extended-Release Naltrexone vs. Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT): Study design and rationale.美国国立药物滥用研究所临床试验网络CTN - 0051,长效纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡用于阿片类药物治疗对比研究(X:BOT):研究设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Cost-effectiveness implications of increasing the efficiency of the extended-release naltrexone induction process for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a secondary analysis.提高长效纳曲酮诱导治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的效率的成本效益影响:二次分析。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3444-3453. doi: 10.1111/add.15531. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Trajectory classes of opioid use among individuals in a randomized controlled trial comparing extended-release naltrexone and buprenorphine-naloxone.在一项比较缓释纳曲酮和丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮的随机对照试验中,个体阿片类药物使用的轨迹类别。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107649. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107649. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
7
Buprenorphine-naloxone vs. extended-release naltrexone for opioid use disorder in individuals with and without criminal legal involvement: A secondary analysis of the X:BOT randomized controlled trial.丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮与纳曲酮长效制剂治疗有和无刑事法律问题的阿片类物质使用障碍:X:BOT 随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Sep;164:209438. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209438. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
8
Does XR injectable naltrexone prevent relapse as effectively as daily sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone?XR 注射用纳曲酮是否能像每日舌下给予丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮一样有效地预防复发?
J Fam Pract. 2020 Dec;69(10):E14-E15.
9
Revisiting the X:BOT Naltrexone Clinical Trial Using a Comprehensive Survival Analysis.重新审视 X:BOT 纳曲酮临床试验的综合生存分析。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(4):440-446. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000931.
10
Outpatient transition to extended-release injectable naltrexone for patients with opioid use disorder: A phase 3 randomized trial.门诊患者向阿片类药物使用障碍患者过渡使用长效纳曲酮注射剂:一项 3 期随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 1;187:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Economic Impact of Periodic Hepatitis C Virus Testing Among People Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒者定期丙型肝炎病毒检测的健康与经济影响
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251870. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1870.
2
Economic Evaluation of Delivering an Evidence-Based Online HIV Prevention Program to MSM via Direct-To-Consumer Marketing Versus Community-Based Organization Recruitment.通过直接面向消费者的营销与基于社区组织招募,向男男性行为者提供循证在线艾滋病毒预防项目的经济评估。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):257-264. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003572.
3
Health and Economic Outcomes of Offering Buprenorphine in Homeless Shelters in Massachusetts.在马萨诸塞州的无家可归者收容所提供丁丙诺啡的健康和经济结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2437233. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37233.
4
Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder.阿片类物质使用障碍患者的丁丙诺啡缓释片的经济学评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2329583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29583.
5
Estimated Costs and Outcomes Associated With Use and Nonuse of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder During Incarceration and at Release in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州监禁期间和释放后使用和不使用阿片类药物使用障碍药物相关的估计费用和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237036. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7036.
6
Population-level impact of initiating pharmacotherapy and linking to care people with opioid use disorder at inpatient medically managed withdrawal programs: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.在住院医学管理戒断项目中,为阿片类使用障碍患者启动药物治疗和联系护理对人群的影响:一项有效性和成本效益分析。
Addiction. 2022 Sep;117(9):2450-2461. doi: 10.1111/add.15879. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA).预防有犯罪记录的青少年在向成年期过渡期间使用阿片类药物:利用安全成年人(LeSA)。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3.
8
Cost-effectiveness implications of increasing the efficiency of the extended-release naltrexone induction process for the treatment of opioid use disorder: a secondary analysis.提高长效纳曲酮诱导治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的效率的成本效益影响:二次分析。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3444-3453. doi: 10.1111/add.15531. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Economic evaluation in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Past, present, and future.国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络中的经济评估:过去、现在与未来。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Mar;112S:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.02.002.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Buprenorphine-Naloxone Versus Extended-Release Naltrexone to Prevent Opioid Relapse.丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮与纳曲酮长效制剂预防阿片类药物复吸的成本效益比较。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;170(2):90-98. doi: 10.7326/M18-0227. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Buprenorphine Use and Spending for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: Trends From 2003 to 2015.美沙酮使用与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗费用:2003 年至 2015 年趋势
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):832-835. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700315. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
Outpatient transition to extended-release injectable naltrexone for patients with opioid use disorder: A phase 3 randomized trial.门诊患者向阿片类药物使用障碍患者过渡使用长效纳曲酮注射剂:一项 3 期随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jun 1;187:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Vital Signs: Trends in Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Opioid Overdoses - United States, July 2016-September 2017.生命体征:2016年7月至2017年9月美国疑似阿片类药物过量急诊就诊趋势
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Mar 9;67(9):279-285. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6709e1.
4
Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.长效纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮预防阿片类药物复发的比较效果(X:BOT):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):309-318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32812-X. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.注射用长效纳曲酮与每日服用丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的疗效比较:一项随机临床非劣效性试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1197-1205. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3206.
6
Long-Acting Injectable Naltrexone Induction: A Randomized Trial of Outpatient Opioid Detoxification With Naltrexone Versus Buprenorphine.长效注射用纳曲酮诱导:纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡用于门诊阿片类药物脱毒的随机试验
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;174(5):459-467. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050548. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Primary Care-Based Models for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review.基于初级保健的阿片类物质使用障碍治疗模式:一项范围综述
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Feb 21;166(4):268-278. doi: 10.7326/M16-2149. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
Adjusting Health Expenditures for Inflation: A Review of Measures for Health Services Research in the United States.调整卫生支出的通货膨胀率:美国卫生服务研究的措施述评。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):175-196. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12612. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
NIDA Clinical Trials Network CTN-0051, Extended-Release Naltrexone vs. Buprenorphine for Opioid Treatment (X:BOT): Study design and rationale.美国国立药物滥用研究所临床试验网络CTN - 0051,长效纳曲酮与丁丙诺啡用于阿片类药物治疗对比研究(X:BOT):研究设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Sep;50:253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
Economic Evaluations of Opioid Use Disorder Interventions.阿片类物质使用障碍干预措施的经济学评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Sep;34(9):863-87. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0400-5.

阿片类物质使用障碍患者住院戒毒后的药物治疗成本。

Cost of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders following inpatient detoxification.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Soffer Clinical Research Center, Ste 1019, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(11):526-531.

PMID:30452209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6345513/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the costs of providing extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) and buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) following inpatient detoxification using data derived from a multisite randomized controlled trial at 8 US community-based treatment programs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cost data were collected for 3 intervention phases: program start-up, inpatient detoxification, and up to 24 weeks of medication induction and management visits (post detoxification). Cost analyses were from the healthcare sector perspective (2015 US$); patient costs are also reported.

METHODS

We conducted site visits, administered a cost survey to treatment programs, and analyzed study data on medication and services utilization. Nationally representative sources were used to estimate unit costs. Uncertainty was evaluated in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Mean start-up costs were $1071 per program for XR-NTX and $828 per program for BUP-NX. Mean costs per participant were $5416 for XR-NTX (57% detoxification, 37% medication, 3% provider, 3% patient) and $4148 for BUP-NX (64% detoxification, 12% medication, 10% provider, 14% patient). Total cost per participant ranged by site from $2979 to $8963 for XR-NTX and from $2521 to $6486 for BUP-NX.

CONCLUSIONS

For treatment providers, offering XR-NTX and/or BUP-NX as part of existing detoxification treatment modalities generates modest costs in addition to the costs of detoxification, which vary substantially among the 8 sites. From the patient's perspective, the costs associated with medication management visits may be a barrier for some individuals considering these treatments.

摘要

目的

利用 8 家美国社区治疗项目多地点随机对照试验的数据,估算为接受住院戒毒治疗的患者提供延长释放型纳曲酮(XR-NTX)和丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(BUP-NX)的后续治疗费用。

研究设计

收集了 3 个干预阶段的成本数据:项目启动、住院戒毒治疗,以及最多 24 周的药物诱导和管理就诊(戒毒后)。成本分析从医疗保健部门的角度(2015 年美国美元)进行;还报告了患者的成本。

方法

我们进行了现场访问,向治疗项目发放了成本调查,并分析了关于药物和服务利用的数据。利用全国代表性来源估算单位成本。在敏感性分析中评估了不确定性。

结果

XR-NTX 项目的平均启动成本为每个项目 1071 美元,BUP-NX 项目的平均启动成本为每个项目 828 美元。XR-NTX 每位参与者的平均费用为 5416 美元(57%为戒毒,37%为药物,3%为提供者,3%为患者),BUP-NX 为 4148 美元(64%为戒毒,12%为药物,10%为提供者,14%为患者)。XR-NTX 每位参与者的总费用范围为每个项目 2979 美元至 8963 美元,BUP-NX 为每个项目 2521 美元至 6486 美元。

结论

对于治疗提供者来说,除了戒毒治疗的成本之外,提供 XR-NTX 和/或 BUP-NX 作为现有戒毒治疗模式的一部分会产生适度的成本,而这在 8 个地点之间存在很大差异。从患者的角度来看,考虑到这些治疗方法,药物管理就诊相关的费用可能是一些人的障碍。