Mori Maurizio
Università di Torino, Torino, Italy.
J Med Philos. 2018 Nov 17;43(6):710-723. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhy029.
Engelhardt's After God gives a comprehensive perspective on the deepest and hardest issues in both moral philosophy and bioethics of our time. Although the book is an intelligent critique of contemporary moral philosophy in favor of a kind of traditionalism rooted in the perspective of the Orthodox Church, containing numerous forceful arguments, I ultimately disagree with Engelhardt on several main points stemming from his pessimistic view of our current culture and society. I have neither the pretense to open new perspectives, nor to put forward new arguments, and I am aware that I might be wrong. I simply want to present a different position on the quest for meaning.
恩格尔哈特的《上帝之后》对我们这个时代道德哲学和生物伦理学中最深层次、最棘手的问题给出了全面的视角。尽管这本书是对当代道德哲学的明智批判，支持一种根植于东正教视角的传统主义，包含众多有力论证，但最终我在几个主要观点上与恩格尔哈特存在分歧，这些分歧源于他对我们当前文化和社会的悲观看法。我既无意开辟新的视角，也无意提出新的论证，并且我意识到自己可能是错的。我只是想在对意义的探寻上呈现一种不同的立场。
