Suppr超能文献

学龄前语言发育障碍儿童与正常儿童对形态句法信息敏感性的随访研究。

Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in Preschool Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: A Follow-Up Study.

机构信息

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):3064-3074. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0038.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study tested children's sensitivity to tense/agreement information in fronted auxiliaries during online comprehension of questions (e.g., Are the nice little dogs running?). Data from children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were compared to previously published data from typically developing (TD) children matched according to sentence comprehension test scores.

METHOD

Fifteen 5-year-old children with DLD and fifteen 3-year-old TD children participated in a looking-while-listening task. Children viewed pairs of pictures, 1 with a single agent and 1 with multiple agents, accompanied by a sentence with a fronted auxiliary (is + single agent or are + two agents) or a control sentence. Proportion looking to the target was measured.

RESULTS

Children with DLD did not show anticipatory looking based on the number information contained in the auxiliary (is or are) as the younger TD children had. Both groups showed significant increases in looking to the target upon hearing the subject noun (e.g., dogs).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the groups' similar sentence comprehension abilities and ability to accurately respond to the information provided by the subject noun, children with DLD did not show sensitivity to number information on the fronted auxiliary. This insensitivity is considered in light of these children's weaker command of tense/agreement forms in their speech. Specifically, we consider the possibility that failure to grasp the relation between the subject-verb sequence (e.g., dogs running) and preceding information (e.g., are) in questions in the input contributes to the protracted inconsistency in producing auxiliary forms in obligatory contexts by children with DLD.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7283459.

摘要

目的

本研究通过在线理解疑问句(例如,这些可爱的小狗在跑吗?)测试儿童在前置助动词中对时态/一致信息的敏感性。将发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童的数据与根据句子理解测试分数匹配的典型发育(TD)儿童的先前发表的数据进行比较。

方法

15 名 5 岁患有 DLD 的儿童和 15 名 3 岁 TD 儿童参加了听一听看一眼任务。孩子们观看了一对图片,一张图片中有一个单一的主体,另一张图片中有多个主体,同时伴随着一个带有前置助动词(is + 单一主体或 are + 两个主体)或控制句子的句子。测量了对目标的注视比例。

结果

患有 DLD 的儿童没有像年轻的 TD 儿童那样根据助动词(is 或 are)中包含的数量信息进行预期的注视。两组儿童在听到主语名词(例如,dogs)时都显著增加了对目标的注视。

结论

尽管两组儿童的句子理解能力和准确响应主语名词所提供信息的能力相似,但 DLD 儿童对前置助动词的数量信息没有表现出敏感性。考虑到这些儿童在其言语中对时态/一致性形式的掌握较弱,这种不敏感性被认为是不可取的。具体来说,我们考虑了这样一种可能性,即在输入中未能理解主语-动词序列(例如,dogs running)与前面的信息(例如,are)之间的关系可能导致 DLD 儿童在强制性上下文中产生助动词形式的长期不一致。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7283459.

相似文献

2
Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in 3-Year-Old Children With Typical Language Development: A Feasibility Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):668-674. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0153.
6
Sentence Repetition: A Clinical Marker for Developmental Language Disorder in Danish.句子重复:丹麦发育性语言障碍的临床标志物。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Nov 22;62(12):4450-4463. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0327. Print 2019 Dec 18.
7
Verb Vocabulary Supports Event Probability Use in Developmental Language Disorder.动词词汇支持发展性语言障碍中的事件概率使用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 May 7;67(5):1490-1513. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00600. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

5
Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.发展性语言障碍儿童的人工语法学习。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):292-302. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00050. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Using Computerized Language Analysis to Evaluate Grammatical Skills.使用计算机语言分析评估语法技能。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Apr 7;51(2):184-204. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00032.
8
Subject-Aux Inversion in Children with SLI.特定语言障碍儿童中的主语-助动词倒装
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Aug;48(4):921-946. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in 3-Year-Old Children With Typical Language Development: A Feasibility Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):668-674. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0153.
2
A Clinical Evaluation of the Competing Sources of Input Hypothesis.输入假说竞争来源的临床评估
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):104-120. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0448.
7
Are some parents' interaction styles associated with richer grammatical input?有些家长的互动方式是否与更丰富的语法输入有关?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Aug;22(3):476-88. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0111). Epub 2012 Dec 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验