• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饼干在哪里?两三岁的孩子会用带有数字标记的动词来预测即将出现的名词。

Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns.

作者信息

Lukyanenko Cynthia, Fisher Cynthia

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:349-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012
PMID:26513355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4673033/
Abstract

We tested toddlers' and adults' predictive use of English subject-verb agreement. Participants saw pairs of pictures differing in number and kind (e.g., one apple, two cookies), and heard sentences with a target noun naming one of the pictures. The target noun was the subject of a preceding agreeing verb in informative trials (e.g., Wherearethe good cookies?), but not in uninformative trials (Do you see the good cookies?). In Experiment 1, 3-year-olds and adults were faster and more likely to shift their gaze from distractor to target upon hearing an informative agreeing verb. In Experiment 2, 2.5-year-olds were faster to shift their gaze from distractor to target in response to the noun in informative trials, and were more likely to be fixating the target already at noun onset. Thus, toddlers used agreeing verbs to predict number features of an upcoming noun. These data provide strong new evidence for the broad scope of predictive processing in online language comprehension.

摘要

我们测试了幼儿和成年人对英语主谓一致的预测性运用。参与者观看了在数量和种类上不同的图片对(例如,一个苹果、两块饼干),并听到含有一个指代其中一张图片的目标名词的句子。在信息性试验中,目标名词是前面一致动词的主语(例如,“Where are the good cookies?”),但在非信息性试验中不是(“Do you see the good cookies?”)。在实验1中,3岁儿童和成年人在听到信息性一致动词时,更快且更有可能将目光从干扰物转向目标。在实验2中,2.5岁儿童在信息性试验中,对名词做出反应时更快地将目光从干扰物转向目标,并且更有可能在名词出现时就已经注视着目标。因此,幼儿使用一致动词来预测即将出现的名词的数量特征。这些数据为在线语言理解中预测性处理的广泛范围提供了强有力的新证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/92b56fc9c6fe/nihms733846f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/ffe886a5a6ee/nihms733846f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/849ddf8ae50f/nihms733846f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/cc1bb511927b/nihms733846f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/8aa637db77f3/nihms733846f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/120b10ce9dbe/nihms733846f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/fb1082fd01a9/nihms733846f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/aa3ca85b5523/nihms733846f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/8ca505c7e3ff/nihms733846f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/68b2b08378b9/nihms733846f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/aa8c557db566/nihms733846f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/92b56fc9c6fe/nihms733846f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/ffe886a5a6ee/nihms733846f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/849ddf8ae50f/nihms733846f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/cc1bb511927b/nihms733846f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/8aa637db77f3/nihms733846f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/120b10ce9dbe/nihms733846f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/fb1082fd01a9/nihms733846f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/aa3ca85b5523/nihms733846f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/8ca505c7e3ff/nihms733846f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/68b2b08378b9/nihms733846f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/aa8c557db566/nihms733846f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca93/4673033/92b56fc9c6fe/nihms733846f9.jpg

相似文献

1
Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns.饼干在哪里?两三岁的孩子会用带有数字标记的动词来预测即将出现的名词。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:349-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
2
Verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in people with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患者的动词介导的预期眼动。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Sep;54(5):756-766. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12473. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
3
Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension.为什么要等动词呢?土耳其语儿童会使用格助词来理解语言的增量。
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:152-180. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Graded expectations in visually situated comprehension: Costs and benefits as indexed by the N400.视境理解中的预期分级:N400 索引的代价与收益
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):624-631. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01827-3. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Combining EEG and 3D-eye-tracking to study the prediction of upcoming speech in naturalistic virtual environments: A proof of principle.结合脑电图(EEG)和三维眼动追踪技术研究自然虚拟环境中即将到来的语音预测:一项原理验证。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Dec 15;191:108730. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108730. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
The trouble with nouns and verbs in Greek fluent aphasia.希腊语流利性失语症中名词和动词的问题。
J Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
7
The mechanisms of prediction updating that impact the processing of upcoming word: An event-related potential study on sentence comprehension.影响处理后续单词的预测更新机制:句子理解的事件相关电位研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1714-1734. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000835. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
Ambiguous function words do not prevent 18-month-olds from building accurate syntactic category expectations: An ERP study.歧义功能词不会妨碍18个月大的婴儿建立准确的句法类别预期:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Apr;98:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Three-year-olds can predict a noun based on an attributive adjective: evidence from eye-tracking.三岁儿童能够根据定语形容词预测名词:来自眼动追踪的证据。
J Child Lang. 2016 Mar;43(2):425-441. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000173. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
Noun and verb processing in aphasia: Behavioural profiles and neural correlates.失语症中的名词和动词加工:行为特征和神经关联。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jan 31;18:215-230. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.023. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's expressive and receptive knowledge of the English regular plural.儿童对英语规则复数形式的表达性和接受性知识。
Dev Psychol. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1037/dev0001986.
2
iCatcher+: Robust and Automated Annotation of Infants' and Young Children's Gaze Behavior From Videos Collected in Laboratory, Field, and Online Studies.iCatcher+:对在实验室、实地和在线研究中收集的视频里婴幼儿注视行为进行稳健且自动化的标注
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;6(2). doi: 10.1177/25152459221147250. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
Word prediction using closely and moderately related verbs in Down syndrome.使用唐氏综合征中紧密相关和中度相关动词进行单词预测。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:934826. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934826. eCollection 2022.
4
Change is hard: Individual differences in children's lexical processing and executive functions after a shift in dimensions.改变是困难的:维度转变后儿童词汇加工与执行功能的个体差异
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(2):229-247. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1947289. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Developmental changes in how children generalize from their experience to support predictive linguistic processing.儿童如何从经验中进行泛化以支持预测性语言处理的发展变化。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jul;219:105349. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105349. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Look at that: Spatial deixis reveals experience-related differences in prediction.看这个:空间指示揭示了预测中与经验相关的差异。
Lang Acquis. 2022;29(1):1-26. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2021.1932905. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Cross-clause planning in Nungon (Papua New Guinea): Eye-tracking evidence.农贡语(巴布亚新几内亚)中跨句规划:眼动追踪证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):666-680. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01253-3. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Prediction Impairment May Explain Communication Difficulties in Autism.预测能力受损可能解释自闭症患者的沟通困难。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:734024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734024. eCollection 2021.
9
The Acquisition of Noun and Verb Categories by Bootstrapping From a Few Known Words: A Computational Model.通过从少量已知词汇进行自展学习来获取名词和动词类别:一个计算模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:661479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661479. eCollection 2021.
10
Adults and children predict in complex and variable referential contexts.成人和儿童在复杂多变的指称语境中进行预测。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021;36(4):474-490. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1839665. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Receptive Grammatical Knowledge of Familiar Content Words and Inflection in 16-Month-Olds.16个月大婴儿对熟悉实词和词形变化的接受性语法知识
Infancy. 2007 Jul;12(1):1-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00231.x. Epub 2007 Jul 1.
2
Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.句子理解中的预处理:对可能即将出现的意义和结构的敏感性。
Lang Linguist Compass. 2014 Dec;8(12):631-645. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12093. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
Syntactic bootstrapping.句法启动。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;1(2):143-149. doi: 10.1002/wcs.17. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
4
Representations of abstract grammatical feature agreement in young children.幼儿对抽象语法特征一致性的表征。
J Child Lang. 2015 Nov;42(6):1379-93. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000804. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Sequential expectations: the role of prediction-based learning in language.序列期望:基于预测的学习在语言中的作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):138-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01072.x.
6
Real-time interpretation of novel events across childhood.对儿童期新出现事件的实时解读。
J Mem Lang. 2014 May 1;73:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.001.
7
Surprise! Infants consider possible bases of generalization for a single input example.惊喜!婴儿会思考单个输入示例的可能泛化基础。
Dev Sci. 2015 Jan;18(1):80-9. doi: 10.1111/desc.12183. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Children and adults integrate talker and verb information in online processing.儿童和成人在在线处理中整合说话者和动词信息。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1600-13. doi: 10.1037/a0035591. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
9
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
10
Children's assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences.儿童在汉语被动句在线加工过程中对语法角色的分配
J Mem Lang. 2013 Nov 1;69(4). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.002.