• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用肌肉活动和加速度计测量久坐行为。

Measuring Sedentary Behavior by Means of Muscular Activity and Accelerometry.

机构信息

Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Stockholm, Sweden.

Institute of Mechanical Systems, School of Engineering, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;18(11):4010. doi: 10.3390/s18114010.

DOI:10.3390/s18114010
PMID:30453605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6263709/
Abstract

Sedentary Behavior (SB) is among the most frequent human behaviors and is associated with a plethora of serious chronic lifestyle diseases as well as premature death. Office workers in particular are at an increased risk due to their extensive amounts of occupational SB. However, we still lack an objective method to measure SB consistent with its definition. We have therefore developed a new measurement system based on muscular activity and accelerometry. The primary aim of the present study was to calibrate the new-developed 8-CH-EMG+ for measuring occupational SB against an indirect calorimeter during typical desk-based office work activities. In total, 25 volunteers performed nine office tasks at three typical workplaces. Minute-by-minute posture and activity classification was performed using subsequent decision trees developed with artificial intelligence data processing techniques. The 8-CH-EMG+ successfully identified all sitting episodes (AUC = 1.0). Furthermore, depending on the number of electromyography channels included, the device has a sensitivity of 83⁻98% and 74⁻98% to detect SB and active sitting (AUC = 0.85⁻0.91). The 8-CH-EMG+ advances the field of objective SB measurements by combining accelerometry with muscular activity. Future field studies should consider the use of EMG sensors to record SB in line with its definition.

摘要

久坐行为(SB)是最常见的人类行为之一,与许多严重的慢性生活方式疾病以及过早死亡有关。由于大量的职业性 SB,特别是办公室工作人员处于更高的风险之中。然而,我们仍然缺乏一种与定义一致的客观测量 SB 的方法。因此,我们根据肌肉活动和加速度计开发了一种新的测量系统。本研究的主要目的是根据间接热量计,对新开发的 8 通道肌电图+(8-CH-EMG+)在典型的基于办公桌的办公活动中测量职业性 SB 进行校准。总共有 25 名志愿者在三个典型的工作场所完成了九项办公任务。使用后续的决策树,通过人工智能数据处理技术对每分钟的姿势和活动分类进行了分类。8-CH-EMG+成功识别了所有坐姿(AUC=1.0)。此外,根据包含的肌电图通道数量,该设备检测 SB 和主动坐姿的灵敏度为 83%-98%和 74%-98%(AUC=0.85-0.91)。8-CH-EMG+通过将加速度计与肌肉活动相结合,推动了客观 SB 测量领域的发展。未来的现场研究应考虑使用肌电图传感器根据定义来记录 SB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e996/6263709/6197bf298ce4/sensors-18-04010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e996/6263709/a4f5f4a4990b/sensors-18-04010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e996/6263709/6197bf298ce4/sensors-18-04010-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e996/6263709/a4f5f4a4990b/sensors-18-04010-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e996/6263709/6197bf298ce4/sensors-18-04010-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Sedentary Behavior by Means of Muscular Activity and Accelerometry.使用肌肉活动和加速度计测量久坐行为。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 17;18(11):4010. doi: 10.3390/s18114010.
2
Validation of Accelerometer Thresholds and Inclinometry for Measurement of Sedentary Behavior in Young Adult University Students.加速度计阈值和测斜法在测量青年大学生久坐行为中的验证
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):492-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21694. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
3
Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.ActiGraph 腰部和腕部切点在测量办公室工作中的久坐行为、活动水平和姿势方面的同时效度和区分效度。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10387-7.
4
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.评估与理解办公室上班族的久坐行为:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z.
5
Is Sitting Always Inactive and Standing Always Active? A Simultaneous Free-Living activPal and ActiGraph Analysis.坐着总是不动,站着总是活跃吗?同时使用 activPal 和 ActiGraph 进行自由生活分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 28;17(23):8864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238864.
6
Sedentary behavior: Different types of operationalization influence outcome measures.久坐行为:不同类型的操作化会影响结果测量。
Gait Posture. 2017 May;54:188-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.025. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Assessment of sedentary behaviors and transport-related activities by questionnaire: a validation study.通过问卷调查评估久坐行为和与交通相关的活动:一项验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 9;16:753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3412-3.
8
Validation of the VitaBit Sit-Stand Tracker: Detecting Sitting, Standing, and Activity Patterns.验证 VitaBit 坐立追踪器:检测坐、立和活动模式。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 15;18(3):877. doi: 10.3390/s18030877.
9
Cross-sectional Examination of Long-term Access to Sit-Stand Desks in a Professional Office Setting.专业办公环境中使用坐站两用办公桌的长期可及性横断面调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Sedentary Thresholds for Accelerometry-Based Mean Amplitude Deviation and Electromyography Amplitude in 7-11 Years Old Children.7至11岁儿童基于加速度计的平均幅度偏差和肌电图幅度的久坐阈值
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 7;10:997. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00997. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of plasma BMP-2, BMP-7, BMP-10, vitamin D, and TGF β1 in simple fractures among Sudanese patients.评估苏丹患者单纯性骨折患者的血浆 BMP-2、BMP-7、BMP-10、维生素 D 和 TGFβ1。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247472. eCollection 2021.
2
Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.ActiGraph 腰部和腕部切点在测量办公室工作中的久坐行为、活动水平和姿势方面的同时效度和区分效度。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10387-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings.制定量化的公众健康坐姿指南是否恰逢其时?对久坐行为研究范式和研究结果的叙述性综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(6):377-382. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
2
Energy Expenditure of Standing Compared to Sitting While Conducting Office Tasks.站立与坐姿办公时的能量消耗比较。
Hum Factors. 2017 Nov;59(7):1078-1087. doi: 10.1177/0018720817719167. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
3
Evaluation of the activPAL accelerometer for physical activity and energy expenditure estimation in a semi-structured setting.
在半结构化环境中评估activPAL加速度计用于身体活动和能量消耗估计的情况。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Nov;20(11):1003-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Acute Metabolic Response, Energy Expenditure, and EMG Activity in Sitting and Standing.坐姿和站姿下的急性代谢反应、能量消耗及肌电图活动
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Sep;49(9):1927-1934. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001305.
5
The activPALTM Accurately Classifies Activity Intensity Categories in Healthy Adults.activPALTM能准确对健康成年人的活动强度类别进行分类。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 May;49(5):1022-1028. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001177.
6
Does a dynamic chair increase office workers' movements? - Results from a combined laboratory and field study.动态座椅能否增加办公室职员的活动量?——一项实验室与实地联合研究的结果
Appl Ergon. 2017 Apr;60:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
7
Energy Cost of Standing in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort: Are Energy-Savers a Minority or the Majority?多民族队列中站立的能量消耗:节能者是少数还是多数?
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169478. eCollection 2017.
8
Approximate Time to Steady-state Resting Energy Expenditure Using Indirect Calorimetry in Young, Healthy Adults.使用间接测热法测定年轻健康成年人静息能量消耗达到稳态的大致时间。
Front Nutr. 2016 Nov 3;3:49. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00049. eCollection 2016.
9
Empirically derived cut-points for sedentary behaviour: are we sitting differently?久坐行为的经验性切点:我们的坐姿不同吗?
Physiol Meas. 2016 Oct;37(10):1669-1685. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/10/1669. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Energy expenditure of deskwork when sitting, standing or alternating positions.坐姿、站姿和交替姿势下的伏案工作能量消耗。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Mar 1;67(2):121-127. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw115.