• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生干预欺凌行为的意愿:与课堂凝聚力和自我效能感的直接和间接关联。

Students' Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: Direct and Indirect Associations with Classroom Cohesion and Self-Efficacy.

机构信息

Department of Educational Studies, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.

Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Institute of Health Sciences, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 17;15(11):2577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112577.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15112577
PMID:30453658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6267557/
Abstract

Although school climate and self-efficacy have received some attention in the literature, as correlates of students' willingness to intervene in bullying, to date, very little is known about the potential mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between classroom climate and students' willingness to intervene in bullying. To this end, the present study analyzes whether the relationship between classroom cohesion (as one facet of classroom climate) and students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations is mediated by self-efficacy in social conflicts. This study is based on a representative stratified random sample of two thousand and seventy-one students (51.3% male), between the ages of twelve and seventeen, from twenty-four schools in Germany. Results showed that between 43% and 48% of students reported that they would not intervene in bullying. A mediation test using the structural equation modeling framework revealed that classroom cohesion and self-efficacy in social conflicts were directly associated with students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations. Furthermore, classroom cohesion was indirectly associated with higher levels of students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations, due to self-efficacy in social conflicts. We thus conclude that: (1) It is crucial to increase students' willingness to intervene in bullying; (2) efforts to increase students' willingness to intervene in bullying should promote students' confidence in dealing with social conflicts and interpersonal relationships; and (3) self-efficacy plays an important role in understanding the relationship between classroom cohesion and students' willingness to intervene in bullying. Recommendations are provided to help increase adolescents' willingness to intervene in bullying and for future research.

摘要

尽管学校氛围和自我效能感在文献中受到了一定的关注,是学生干预欺凌行为意愿的相关因素,但迄今为止,关于自我效能感在课堂氛围与学生干预欺凌行为意愿之间的潜在中介作用,我们知之甚少。为此,本研究分析了课堂凝聚力(作为课堂氛围的一个方面)与学生干预欺凌情况的意愿之间的关系是否通过社会冲突中的自我效能感来中介。本研究基于德国 24 所学校的 2071 名 12 至 17 岁学生(男生占 51.3%)的代表性分层随机样本。结果表明,43%至 48%的学生表示他们不会干预欺凌行为。使用结构方程模型框架进行的中介测试表明,课堂凝聚力和社会冲突中的自我效能感与学生干预欺凌情况的意愿直接相关。此外,由于社会冲突中的自我效能感,课堂凝聚力与学生干预欺凌情况的意愿呈间接相关。因此,我们得出以下结论:(1)提高学生干预欺凌行为的意愿至关重要;(2)提高学生干预欺凌行为意愿的努力应促进学生处理社会冲突和人际关系的信心;(3)自我效能感在理解课堂凝聚力与学生干预欺凌行为意愿之间的关系方面发挥着重要作用。为了帮助提高青少年干预欺凌的意愿并为未来的研究提供了建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f4/6267557/a048b11669d9/ijerph-15-02577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f4/6267557/a048b11669d9/ijerph-15-02577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1f4/6267557/a048b11669d9/ijerph-15-02577-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Students' Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: Direct and Indirect Associations with Classroom Cohesion and Self-Efficacy.学生干预欺凌行为的意愿:与课堂凝聚力和自我效能感的直接和间接关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 17;15(11):2577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112577.
2
Associations among Adolescents' Relationships with Parents, Peers, and Teachers, Self-Efficacy, and Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: A Social Cognitive Approach.青少年与父母、同伴和教师的关系、自我效能感与干预欺凌行为意愿的关系:社会认知方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020420.
3
Teacher and staff perceptions of school environment as predictors of student aggression, victimization, and willingness to intervene in bullying situations.教师和工作人员对学校环境的看法作为学生攻击行为、受欺负情况以及在欺凌情境中进行干预意愿的预测因素。
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Sep;29(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/spq0000072. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Development and validation of the willingness to intervene in bullying scale.发展和验证干预欺凌量表的意愿。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Jun;90 Suppl 1:224-239. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12319. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Early adolescents' willingness to intervene: what roles do attributions, affect, coping, and self-reported victimization play?早期青少年干预意愿:归因、情感、应对方式和自我报告的受害经历在其中扮演了什么角色?
J Sch Psychol. 2014 Jun;52(3):279-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis.班级关系质量与瑞典校园欺凌中防御和被动旁观的社会认知相关性:多层次分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Do networking activities outside of the classroom protect students against being bullied? A field study with students in secondary school settings in Germany.课堂之外的社交活动能保护学生不被欺负吗?一项针对德国中学学生的实地研究。
Violence Vict. 2013;28(5):832-48. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00094.
8
Defending Victims of Bullying in Early Adolescence: A Multilevel Analysis.保护青少年早期受欺凌者:多层次分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1926-1937. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0869-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
To tell or not to tell: what influences children's decisions to report bullying to their teachers?说还是不说:是什么影响了孩子们向老师报告欺凌行为的决定?
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Sep;29(3):336-348. doi: 10.1037/spq0000078.
10
Influences of peers, teachers, and climate on students' willingness to intervene when witnessing anti-transgender harassment.同伴、教师和环境对学生目睹反跨性别骚扰时进行干预意愿的影响。
J Adolesc. 2014 Aug;37(6):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
When motivation isn't enough: perceived teacher attitudes, efficacy, and efforts moderate student responses to bullying.当动机不足时:教师的感知态度、效能感和努力程度会调节学生对欺凌行为的反应。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;13(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02959-8.
2
A Scoping Review of Anti-Bullying Interventions: Reducing Traumatic Effect of Bullying Among Adolescents.一项关于反欺凌干预措施的范围综述:减少欺凌对青少年的创伤影响。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 20;17:289-304. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S443841. eCollection 2024.
3
A Scoping Review of the Online Interventions by Nurses for Reducing Negative Impact of Bullying on Students.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative Bullying Experiences, Adolescent Behavioral and Mental Health, and Academic Achievement: An Integrative Model of Perpetration, Victimization, and Bystander Behavior.累积的欺凌经历、青少年行为与心理健康及学业成就:施虐、受虐及旁观者行为的综合模型
J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1078-4. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?保护受害者:干预欺凌行为需要什么,又会得到同伴怎样的回报?
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Dec;65:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis.
护士在线干预对减少欺凌对学生负面影响的范围综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 24;16:773-783. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S406050. eCollection 2023.
4
Method of Nursing Interventions to Reduce the Incidence of Bullying and Its Impact on Students in School: A Scoping Review.减少校园欺凌发生率及其对学生影响的护理干预方法:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;10(10):1835. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101835.
5
Dublin Anti-Bullying Self-Efficacy Models and Scales: Development and Validation.都柏林反欺凌自我效能模型与量表:编制与验证。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Apr;38(7-8):5748-5773. doi: 10.1177/08862605221127193. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Associations Between Classroom Climate, Empathy, Self-Efficacy, and Countering Hate Speech Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Mediation Analysis.课堂氛围、同理心、自我效能与青少年反仇恨言论行为的关系:多层次中介分析
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Mar;38(5-6):5067-5091. doi: 10.1177/08862605221120905. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
7
Effects of the Action for Neutralization of Bullying Program on Bullying in Spanish Schoolchildren.中和欺凌计划对西班牙学童欺凌行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 27;18(13):6898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136898.
8
Associations among Adolescents' Relationships with Parents, Peers, and Teachers, Self-Efficacy, and Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: A Social Cognitive Approach.青少年与父母、同伴和教师的关系、自我效能感与干预欺凌行为意愿的关系:社会认知方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020420.
9
Challenges and Opportunities of Anti-Bullying Intervention Programs.反欺凌干预计划的挑战与机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 22;16(10):1810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101810.
10
Effects of Intervention Program Prev@cib on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying.干预项目 Prev@cib 对传统欺凌和网络欺凌的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;16(4):527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040527.
班级关系质量与瑞典校园欺凌中防御和被动旁观的社会认知相关性:多层次分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
4
Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention.将霸凌参与者角色和性别作为旁观者干预行为的预测因素。
Aggress Behav. 2017 May;43(3):281-290. doi: 10.1002/ab.21688. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
Influences of peers, teachers, and climate on students' willingness to intervene when witnessing anti-transgender harassment.同伴、教师和环境对学生目睹反跨性别骚扰时进行干预意愿的影响。
J Adolesc. 2014 Aug;37(6):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.数字时代的欺凌行为:对青少年网络欺凌研究的批判性回顾和元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1073-137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
An examination of bullying in georgia schools: demographic and school climate factors associated with willingness to intervene in bullying situations.对佐治亚州学校中欺凌行为的研究:与干预欺凌情况的意愿相关的人口统计学和学校氛围因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;14(4):324-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.3.15637.
8
Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.旁观者在欺凌情境中的行为:基本道德敏感性、道德脱离和保护者自我效能感。
J Adolesc. 2013 Jun;36(3):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
9
Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students.高中生中欺凌、网络欺凌和自杀之间的关联。
J Adolesc. 2013 Apr;36(2):341-50. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: to intervene or not to intervene?旁观者在欺凌事件中的动机:干预还是不干预?
West J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;13(3):247-52. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792.