University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):NP6040-NP6064. doi: 10.1177/0886260518812071. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) college students experience disproportionate rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) compared with their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. Some studies report rates of IPV among lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students as high as 50%, and 9 times greater among transgender students compared with their cisgender peers. Few studies have investigated the impact of intersectional identity on experiencing different types of IPV, such as emotional, physical, and sexual IPV. The present study utilized the National College Health Assessment-II from 2011 to 2013 ( = 88,975) to examine the differences in types of IPV among college students based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and the intersection of these two identities. Bivariate Rao-Scott chi-square and multilevel logistic regression was used to test the associations between sexual orientation, gender identity, and the intersection of these identities on multiple types of IPV. Adjusting for covariates and school clustering, LGBT college students had higher odds of reporting emotional IPV (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 1.34-1.99), physical IPV (AOR = 1.58-2.93), and sexual IPV (AOR = 1.41-6.18). Bisexual and transgender college students demonstrated the highest odds of reporting IPV based on sexual orientation and gender identity, respectively. Intersectional identities were not significantly associated with IPV. These findings demonstrate a need for clinicians working with college students to be aware of the disproportionate prevalence of IPV among LGBT individuals, particularly for those clients those who identify as bisexual and/or transgender and participate in continuing education related to these populations. Furthermore, these findings illustrate the need for additional intersectional research with LGBT college students.
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别 (LGBT) 大学生经历亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的比例不成比例,与异性恋和顺性别者相比。一些研究报告称,女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋大学生中的 IPV 发生率高达 50%,而跨性别学生的发生率比顺性别同龄人高 9 倍。很少有研究调查交叉身份对经历不同类型的 IPV(如情感、身体和性 IPV)的影响。本研究利用 2011 年至 2013 年的全国大学生健康评估-II(n = 88975),根据性取向、性别认同以及这两个身份的交叉,检查大学生中不同类型的 IPV 差异。使用双变量 Rao-Scott 卡方检验和多水平逻辑回归来检验性取向、性别认同以及这两个身份的交叉与多种类型的 IPV 之间的关联。在调整了协变量和学校聚类后,LGBT 大学生报告情感 IPV(调整后的优势比 [AOR] = 1.34-1.99)、身体 IPV(AOR = 1.58-2.93)和性 IPV(AOR = 1.41-6.18)的可能性更高。双性恋和跨性别大学生分别根据性取向和性别认同报告 IPV 的可能性最高。交叉身份与 IPV 没有显著关联。这些发现表明,与大学生合作的临床医生需要意识到 LGBT 个体中 IPV 的不成比例流行,特别是对于那些识别为双性恋和/或跨性别并参加与这些人群相关的继续教育的客户。此外,这些发现说明了需要对 LGBT 大学生进行更多的交叉研究。