Fulati Zibire, Liu Yang, Sun Ning, Kang Yu, Su Yangang, Chen Haiyan, Shu Xianhong
Department of Echocardiography, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging; Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Nov 19;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12947-018-0148-5.
In patients with left ventricular (LV) dysssynchrony, contraction that doesn't fall into ejection period (LVEj) results in a waste of energy due to inappropriate contraction timing, which was now widely treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT). Myocardial Contraction Efficiency was defined as the ratio of Efficient Contraction Time (ECTR) and amplitude of efficient contraction (ECR) during LVEj against that in the entire cardiac cycle. This study prospectively investigated whether efficiency indexes could predict CRT outcome.
Our prospective pilot study including 70 CRT candidates, parameters of myocardial contraction timing and contractility were measured by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and efficiency indexes were calculated accordingly at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. Primary outcome events were predefined as death or HF hospitalization, and secondary outcome events were defined as all-cause death during the follow-up. 16-segement Standard deviation of time to onset strain (TTO-16SD) and time to peak strain (TTP-16SD) were included as the dyssynchrony indexes.
According to LV end systolic volume (LVESV) and LV eject fraction(LVEF) values at 6-month follow-up, subjects were classified into responder and non-responder groups, ECR (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.78-0.97, P < 0.05) and maximum longitudinal strain (MLS) (OR 2.22, 95%CI 1.36-3.61, P < 0.01) were the two independent predictors for CRT response, Both TTO-16SD and TTP-16SD failed to predict outcome. Patients with poorer myocardial contraction efficiency and better contractility are more likely to benefit from CRT.
STE can evaluate left ventricular contraction efficiency and contractility to predict CRT response. When analyzing myocardial strain by STE, contraction during LVEj should be highlighted.
在左心室(LV)不同步的患者中,未落入射血期(LVEj)的收缩由于收缩时机不当导致能量浪费,目前这种情况广泛采用心脏再同步治疗(CRT)。心肌收缩效率定义为LVEj期间有效收缩时间(ECTR)与有效收缩幅度(ECR)之比相对于整个心动周期中的该比值。本研究前瞻性地调查了效率指标是否能预测CRT结果。
我们的前瞻性试点研究纳入了70名CRT候选者,通过斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)测量心肌收缩时间和收缩性参数,并在基线和6个月随访时相应计算效率指标。主要结局事件预先定义为死亡或心力衰竭住院,次要结局事件定义为随访期间的全因死亡。16节段应变开始时间标准差(TTO - 16SD)和应变峰值时间标准差(TTP - 16SD)被纳入作为不同步指标。
根据6个月随访时的左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)值,将受试者分为反应者和无反应者组,ECR(比值比0.87,95%置信区间0.78 - 0.97,P < 0.05)和最大纵向应变(MLS)(比值比2.22,95%置信区间1.36 - 3.61,P < 0.01)是CRT反应的两个独立预测因素,TTO - 16SD和TTP - 16SD均未能预测结局。心肌收缩效率较差但收缩性较好的患者更可能从CRT中获益。
STE可评估左心室收缩效率和收缩性以预测CRT反应。通过STE分析心肌应变时,应突出LVEj期间的收缩。