利益相关者参与多标准决策分析。
Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
作者信息
Thokala Praveen, Madhavan Guruprasad
机构信息
1School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
2National Academies of Sciences Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC USA.
出版信息
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 9;16(Suppl 1):0. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0120-0. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
This brief perspective highlights the importance of decision maker buy-in and ownership through stakeholder engagement in the co-construction of the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model. A brief historical overview of MCDA is presented before outlining the importance of bridging the gap (and to gain trust) between the tool developers and users. The issues with the current MCDA tool development and testing efforts are highlighted, and the ownership and routine adoption of the MCDA process is discussed.
摘要
本简要观点强调了通过利益相关者参与多标准决策分析（MCDA）模型的共同构建，使决策者认同并承担责任的重要性。在概述弥合工具开发者与使用者之间差距（并获得信任）的重要性之前，先对MCDA进行了简要的历史回顾。强调了当前MCDA工具开发和测试工作中存在的问题，并讨论了MCDA流程的责任归属和常规采用情况。
相似文献
1
Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.利益相关者参与多标准决策分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 9;16(Suppl 1):0. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0120-0. eCollection 2018.
2
Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool to Support the Adoption of Evidence-Based Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs.开发多准则决策分析工具以支持采用循证儿童虐待预防方案。
Prev Sci. 2020 Nov;21(8):1059-1064. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01174-8. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
3
Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).平衡医学创新不同阶段的成本与效益：多标准决策分析（MCDA）的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 9;15:262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0.
4
Can multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) be implemented into real-world drug decision-making processes? A Canadian provincial experience.多标准决策分析（MCDA）能否应用于现实世界的药物决策过程？加拿大一个省份的经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Aug 7:1-6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000525.
5
The Use of MCDA in HTA: Great Potential, but More Effort Needed.多准则决策分析在卫生技术评估中的应用：潜力巨大，但仍需努力。
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):394-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review.城市固体废弃物管理背景下多标准决策中的多个利益相关者：综述
Waste Manag. 2015 Jan;35:318-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
7
Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.运用创新的利益相关者参与标准权重工具，运用层次分析法对 MSW 设施场地进行排名。
Waste Manag. 2010 Nov;30(11):2370-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 4.
8
Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.放大每位患者的声音：对涉及患者的多标准决策分析的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0299-1.
9
Patient involvement in reflective multicriteria decision analysis to assist decision making in oncology.患者参与反思性多准则决策分析以辅助肿瘤学决策制定。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):56-63. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003641. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
10
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs.用于罕见病药物评估与评价的多标准决策分析
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 30;4:214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.
引用本文的文献
1
Using multi-criteria decision analysis to describe stakeholder preferences for new quality improvement initiatives that could optimise prescribing in England.运用多标准决策分析来描述利益相关者对新的质量改进举措的偏好，这些举措可优化英格兰的处方开具。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 20;3:1155523. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1155523. eCollection 2023.
2
A Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Operating Model for Investigational Medicinal Products in the Pharmaceutical Industry.制药行业研究用药品的结构化获益-风险评估操作模型。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):849-864. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00508-2. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
3
An intelligent methodology for the use of multi-criteria decision analysis in impact assessment: the case of real-world offshore construction.一种用于多准则决策分析在影响评估中应用的智能方法：以真实世界海上建筑为例。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):15137. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19554-1.
4
Risk management options to contrast the introduction of citrus fruit bacterial canker through ornamental Rutaceae in the Mediterranean Basin: An Italian case study.对比地中海盆地通过观赏芸香科植物引入柑橘溃疡病的风险管理选项：一项意大利案例研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 6;7(2):e06137. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06137. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Software in Healthcare Priority Setting: A Systematic Review.多准则决策分析软件在医疗保健优先级设置中的应用：系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Mar;38(3):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00863-9.
6
Introduction: priority setting in global health.引言：全球卫生领域的优先事项设定
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 9;16(Suppl 1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0115-x. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Using Multicriteria Approaches to Assess the Value of Health Care.运用多标准方法评估医疗保健的价值。
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.011.
2
Compare voting systems to improve them.比较投票系统以改进它们。
Nature. 2017 Jan 10;541(7636):151-153. doi: 10.1038/541151a.
3
Beyond cost-effectiveness: Using systems analysis for infectious disease preparedness.超越成本效益：运用系统分析进行传染病防范。
Vaccine. 2017 Jan 20;35 Suppl 1:A46-A49. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.090. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——新兴良好实践：ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告2
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.用于医疗保健决策的多标准决策分析——简介：ISPOR多标准决策分析新兴良好实践工作组报告1
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis.优先考虑对公共卫生的投资：多标准决策分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Sep;35(3):460-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds099. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
7
Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand.泰国艾滋病防治干预措施优先排序的多准则决策分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Feb 17;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-6.
8
Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients.结合多准则决策分析、伦理学和卫生技术评估：将 EVIDEM 决策框架应用于特纳综合征患者的生长激素治疗。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010 Apr 8;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-8-4.
9
Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applications.证据与价值：对决策的影响——EVIDEM框架及其潜在应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 22;8:270. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-270.
10
Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA).运用多属性效用理论以及规划预算和边际分析（PBMA）进行医疗保健中的优先事项设定。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Feb;64(4):897-910. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.029. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
Zotero 插件