Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 5;9:2548. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02548. eCollection 2018.
Transplantation is unusual in that T cells can recognize alloantigen by at least two distinct pathways: as intact MHC alloantigen on the surface of donor cells via the direct pathway; and as self-restricted processed alloantigen via the indirect pathway. Direct pathway responses are viewed as strong but short-lived and hence responsible for acute rejection, whereas indirect pathway responses are typically thought to be much longer lasting and mediate the progression of chronic rejection. However, this is based on surprisingly scant experimental evidence, and the recent demonstration that MHC alloantigen can be re-presented intact on recipient dendritic cells-the semi-direct pathway-suggests that the conventional view may be an oversimplification. We review recent advances in our understanding of how the different T cell allorecognition pathways are triggered, consider how this generates effector alloantibody and cytotoxic CD8 T cell alloresponses and assess how these responses contribute to early and late allograft rejection. We further discuss how this knowledge may inform development of cellular and pharmacological therapies that aim to improve transplant outcomes, with focus on the use of induced regulatory T cells with indirect allospecificity and on the development of immunometabolic strategies. Acute allograft rejection is likely mediated by indirect and direct pathway CD4 T cell alloresponses.Chronic allograft rejection is largely mediated by indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses. Direct pathway recognition of cross-dressed endothelial derived MHC class II alloantigen may also contribute to chronic rejection, but the extent of this contribution is unknown.Late indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses will be composed of heterogeneous populations of allopeptide specific T helper cell subsets that recognize different alloantigens and are at various stages of effector and memory differentiation.Knowledge of the precise indirect pathway CD4 T cell responses active at late time points in a particular individual will likely inform the development of alloantigen-specific cellular therapies and will guide immunometabolic modulation.
移植的独特之处在于 T 细胞可以通过至少两种不同的途径识别同种异体抗原:作为供体细胞表面完整的 MHC 同种异体抗原,通过直接途径;以及作为自我限制处理的同种异体抗原,通过间接途径。直接途径反应被认为是强烈但短暂的,因此负责急性排斥反应,而间接途径反应通常被认为持续时间更长,并介导慢性排斥反应的进展。然而,这主要基于令人惊讶的少量实验证据,最近的研究表明,MHC 同种异体抗原可以在受者树突状细胞上完整地重新呈递——半直接途径——表明传统观点可能过于简单化。我们回顾了对不同 T 细胞同种异体识别途径如何被触发的理解的最新进展,考虑了这如何产生效应同种异体抗体和细胞毒性 CD8 T 细胞同种异体反应,并评估了这些反应如何导致早期和晚期移植物排斥。我们进一步讨论了这些知识如何为旨在改善移植结果的细胞和药物治疗的发展提供信息,重点关注具有间接同种特异性的诱导调节性 T 细胞的使用和免疫代谢策略的发展。急性移植物排斥反应可能由间接和直接途径 CD4 T 细胞同种异体反应介导。慢性移植物排斥反应主要由间接途径 CD4 T 细胞反应介导。交叉呈递内皮细胞衍生的 MHC Ⅱ类同种异体抗原的直接途径识别也可能导致慢性排斥反应,但这种贡献的程度尚不清楚。晚期间接途径 CD4 T 细胞反应将由识别不同同种抗原并处于效应和记忆分化不同阶段的异质性同种肽特异性辅助性 T 细胞亚群组成。了解特定个体在特定时间点活跃的间接途径 CD4 T 细胞反应的精确信息可能有助于开发同种抗原特异性细胞治疗,并将指导免疫代谢调节。