Pfukenyi Davies M, Mukaratirwa Samson
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe; and, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2018 Oct 18;85(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v85i1.1584.
In this article, the main amphistome species infecting domestic and wild ruminants in East and Southern Africa, their snail intermediate hosts and epidemiological features are reviewed and discussed. Twenty-six amphistome species belonging to nine genera from three families occur in domestic and wild ruminants in the region under review and over 70% of them belong to the genera Calicophoron, Carmyerius and Cotylophoron. Of the amphistome species, 76.9% are shared between domestic and wild ruminant hosts - an important observation when considering the different options for control. Seven freshwater snail species belonging to four genera from two families act as intermediate hosts of the identified amphistome species, with the genus Bulinus contributing 57% of the snail species. Some of the snails are intermediate hosts of amphistome species belonging to the same genus or to different genera; a phenomenon not yet fully elucidated as some snails are reported to be naturally infected with amphistome cercariae of unidentified species. Only nine (34.6%, 9/26) of the amphistome species have known snail intermediate hosts, while most (65.4%, 17/26) have unknown hosts. Species of intermediate hosts and the potential of the flukes to infect these hosts, the biological potential of the snail hosts, the definitive hosts management systems and their grazing habits are considered to be the main factors influencing the epidemiology of amphistomosis. Based on the epidemiological features of amphistome infections, various practical control options are discussed. Further research is necessary to determine amphistome-snail associations, develop diagnostic tests that can detect prepatent infections in the definitive host, determine the burden and economic importance of amphistomosis in domestic and wild ruminants and the efficacy of different anthelmintics in the treatment of patent infections.
本文对感染东非和南非家养及野生反刍动物的主要双口吸虫种类、它们的螺蛳中间宿主及流行病学特征进行了综述和讨论。在本文所涉及区域的家养及野生反刍动物中,有来自3个科9个属的26种双口吸虫,其中70%以上属于杯殖属、卡氏属和殖盘属。在这些双口吸虫种类中,76.9%在家养和野生反刍动物宿主之间共有——这在考虑不同的防控措施时是一项重要发现。来自2个科4个属的7种淡水螺蛳作为已鉴定双口吸虫种类的中间宿主,其中水泡螺属占螺蛳种类的57%。一些螺蛳是同一属或不同属双口吸虫种类的中间宿主;这一现象尚未完全阐明,因为有报道称一些螺蛳自然感染了未鉴定种类的双口吸虫尾蚴。只有9种(34.6%,9/26)双口吸虫有已知的螺蛳中间宿主,而大多数(65.4%,17/26)的中间宿主未知。中间宿主种类以及吸虫感染这些宿主的可能性、螺蛳宿主的生物学特性、终末宿主管理系统及其放牧习惯被认为是影响双口吸虫病流行病学的主要因素。基于双口吸虫感染的流行病学特征,讨论了各种实际防控措施。有必要开展进一步研究以确定双口吸虫与螺蛳的关系、开发能够检测终末宿主潜伏感染的诊断方法、确定双口吸虫病在家养和野生反刍动物中的负担及经济重要性,以及不同驱虫药治疗显性感染的效果。