Miljkovitch Raphaële, Deborde Anne-Sophie, Bernier Annie, Corcos Maurice, Speranza Mario, Pham-Scottez Alexandra
Laboratoire Paragraphe EA 349, Paris 8 University, Saint-Denis, France.
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 16;9:1962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01962. eCollection 2018.
Several researchers point to disorganized attachment as a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, recent studies suggest that specific internal working models (IWMs) of each parent combine to account for child outcomes and that a secure relationship with one parent can protect against the deleterious effects of an insecure relationship with the other parent. It was thus hypothesized that adolescents with BPD are more likely to be disorganized with both their parents, whereas non-clinical controls are more secure with at least one of their caregivers. Thirty-six adolescents with BPD and 30 control participants (aged 13-19) were included. Psychiatrist diagnosis was verified with the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SIDP-IV) and comorbidity was assessed using the Kiddie-SADS. Reported trauma was assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Attachment IWMs of each parent were assessed with the Attachment Multiple Model Interview (AMMI), which enables separate coding for each attachment figure and in which disorganization is conceptualized as conflicting attachment strategies within a specific relationship. Results of a logistic regression analysis suggested that beyond insecure attachment, being disorganized not just with one but with both parents is particularly characteristic of adolescents with BPD. Conversely, belonging to the non-clinical group was predicted by higher security scores with the father and lower deactivation with the mother. Although higher levels of childhood abuse or neglect were reported by adolescents with BPD, the retained attachment dimensions predicted group membership over and above reported trauma. These findings have important implications for clinical intervention and highlight the protective role fathers may have.
几位研究人员指出,混乱型依恋是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的一个核心特征。然而,最近的研究表明,每位父母特定的内部工作模型(IWMs)共同作用,决定了孩子的成长结果,并且与一位父母建立的安全型关系可以抵御与另一位父母建立的不安全型关系所带来的有害影响。因此,研究假设患有BPD的青少年与父母双方的关系更可能是混乱型的,而非临床对照组与至少一位照料者的关系则更具安全感。研究纳入了36名患有BPD的青少年和30名对照参与者(年龄在13 - 19岁之间)。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍结构化访谈(SIDP-IV)对精神科医生的诊断进行核实,并使用儿童版情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(Kiddie-SADS)评估共病情况。使用儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)评估报告的创伤经历。使用依恋多模型访谈(AMMI)评估每位父母的依恋IWMs,该访谈能够对每个依恋对象进行单独编码,并且将混乱型依恋概念化为特定关系中相互冲突的依恋策略。逻辑回归分析结果表明,除了不安全型依恋之外,与父母双方而非仅与一方关系混乱是患有BPD的青少年的特别特征。相反,父亲的安全感得分较高以及母亲的去激活水平较低预示着属于非临床组。尽管患有BPD的青少年报告的童年期虐待或忽视水平较高,但保留的依恋维度在预测组别归属方面超过了报告的创伤经历。这些发现对临床干预具有重要意义,并突出了父亲可能具有的保护作用。