• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用外科医生控制台馈送视频进行手术表现的自动评估的计算机视觉技术。

A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons' console-feed videos.

机构信息

A.T.L.A.S (Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery) Program, Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Apr;14(4):697-707. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1881-9. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11548-018-1881-9
PMID:30460490
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an automated assessment of surgical performance (AASP) system for objective and computerized assessment of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) as an integral part of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using console-feed videos recorded during live surgery.

METHODS

Video recordings of 20 PLNDs were included. The quality of lymph node clearance was assessed based on the features derived from the computer vision process which include: the number and cleared area of the vessels/nerve (N-Vs); image median color map; and mean entropy (measures the level of disorganization) in the video frame. The automated scores were compared to the validated pelvic lymphadenectomy appropriateness and completion evaluation (PLACE) scoring rated by a panel of expert surgeons. Logistic regression analysis was employed to compare automated scores versus PLACE scores.

RESULTS

Fourteen procedures were used to develop the AASP algorithm. A logistic regression model was trained and validated using the aforementioned features with 30% holdout cross-validation. The model was tested on the remaining six procedures, and the accuracy of predicting the expert-based PLACE scores was 83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first automated surgical skill assessment tool that provides an objective evaluation of surgical performance with high accuracy compared to expert surgeons' assessment that can be extended to any endoscopic or robotic video-enabled surgical procedure.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种自动化手术绩效评估(AASP)系统,用于对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)中作为整体部分的盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)进行客观和计算机化评估,该系统使用手术过程中记录的控制台馈送视频。

方法

纳入 20 例 PLND 视频记录。根据计算机视觉过程中得出的特征评估淋巴结清除质量,这些特征包括:血管/神经的数量和清除区域(N-Vs);图像中值颜色图;以及视频帧中的平均熵(衡量无序程度)。自动评分与由专家外科医生组成的小组进行的验证后的盆腔淋巴结切除术适当性和完成评估(PLACE)评分进行比较。采用逻辑回归分析比较自动评分与 PLACE 评分。

结果

使用上述特征开发了 AASP 算法,其中 14 个程序用于开发算法。使用上述特征并结合 30%的保留交叉验证对逻辑回归模型进行了训练和验证。该模型在其余 6 个程序上进行了测试,预测专家基于 PLACE 评分的准确率为 83.3%。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一个提供与专家评估相比具有高精度的客观手术绩效评估的自动化手术技能评估工具,并且可以扩展到任何内镜或机器人视频支持的手术程序。

相似文献

1
A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons' console-feed videos.利用外科医生控制台馈送视频进行手术表现的自动评估的计算机视觉技术。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Apr;14(4):697-707. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1881-9. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
2
Development, validation and clinical application of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Assessment and Completion Evaluation: intraoperative assessment of lymph node dissection after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.盆腔淋巴结清扫术评估与完成度评价的开发、验证及临床应用:膀胱癌机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后淋巴结清扫的术中评估
BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):879-884. doi: 10.1111/bju.13748. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Development and validation of surgical training tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for men.男性机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术训练工具的开发和验证:膀胱切除术评估和手术评估(CASE)。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4458-4464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6191-3. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
5
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:根治性膀胱切除术改良方法的描述。
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):654-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 27.
6
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Robotic Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Bladder: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助体内帕多瓦回肠膀胱术:手术技术、围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):934-940. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
8
Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.根治性膀胱切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:仅接受手术治疗的髂总血管分叉以上淋巴结转移患者的生存率。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.160. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
9
Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.机器人和腹腔镜高位扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术在根治性膀胱切除术中的应用:技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
10
Use of Automated Performance Metrics to Measure Surgeon Performance during Robotic Vesicourethral Anastomosis and Methodical Development of a Training Tutorial.使用自动化绩效指标衡量机器人膀胱尿道吻合术中外科医生的表现,并制定培训教程的方法开发。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):895-902. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.080. Epub 2018 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.人工智能在侵入性外科手术数字视频分析中的应用:范围综述。
BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf073.
2
Computer vision for evaluating retraction of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing prostatectomy.用于评估保留神经前列腺切除术中神经血管束回缩的计算机视觉技术。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 2;19(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02412-3.
3
Artificial intelligence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand today?

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of surgical training tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for men.男性机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术训练工具的开发和验证:膀胱切除术评估和手术评估(CASE)。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4458-4464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6191-3. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Automated surgical skill assessment in RMIS training.机器人微创外科手术训练中的自动手术技能评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 May;13(5):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1735-5. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
A model for predicting the GEARS score from virtual reality surgical simulator metrics.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的人工智能:我们今天处于什么位置?
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 11;18(1):404. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02143-x.
4
Automated analysis of operative video in surgical training: scoping review.手术训练中手术视频的自动化分析:范围综述。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae124.
5
The Contemporary Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review.挽救性根治性前列腺切除术在复发性前列腺癌治疗中的当代作用:最新综述
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;14(7):868. doi: 10.3390/life14070868.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Robotic Oncologic Surgery: A Narrative Review.泌尿外科机器人肿瘤手术中的人工智能:一篇叙述性综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 4;16(9):1775. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091775.
7
Computer-vision based analysis of the neurosurgical scene - A systematic review.基于计算机视觉的神经外科手术场景分析——系统综述
Brain Spine. 2023 Nov 7;3:102706. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102706. eCollection 2023.
8
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.评价机器人手术技术评估中的客观工具和人工智能:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331.
9
Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Feedback to Improve Novice Performance on Robotic Suturing Skills: A Pilot Study.基于人工智能的视频反馈对提高新手机器人缝合技能的影响:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2024 Aug;38(8):884-891. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0328. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
10
Pilot Analysis of Surgeon Instrument Utilization Signatures Based on Shannon Entropy and Deep Learning for Surgeon Performance Assessment in a Cadaveric Carotid Artery Injury Control Simulation.基于 Shannon 熵和深度学习的外科医生器械利用特征的初步分析,用于尸体颈动脉损伤控制模拟中的外科医生绩效评估。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023 Dec 1;25(6):e330-e337. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000888. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
基于虚拟现实手术模拟器指标预测 GEARS 评分的模型。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3576-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6082-7. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Video and accelerometer-based motion analysis for automated surgical skills assessment.基于视频和加速度计的运动分析用于自动化手术技能评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Mar;13(3):443-455. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1704-z. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Interpretation of motion analysis of laparoscopic instruments based on principal component analysis in box trainer settings.基于箱式训练器中主成分分析的腹腔镜器械运动分析解读。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3096-3107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6022-6. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
A software-based tool for video motion tracking in the surgical skills assessment landscape.用于手术技能评估领域视频运动跟踪的基于软件的工具。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2994-2999. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6023-5. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
7
A decade of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training: Time-based metrics and qualitative grading for fellows and residents.十年机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术培训:针对 fellows 和住院医师的基于时间的指标及定性分级
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jan;36(1):13.e19-13.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Development and Validation of an Objective Scoring Tool for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的客观评分工具的开发和验证:前列腺切除术评估和能力评估。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1237-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.100. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Automated video-based assessment of surgical skills for training and evaluation in medical schools.用于医学院校培训与评估的基于视频的手术技能自动化评估
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Sep;11(9):1623-36. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1468-2. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
Development and Validation of a Quality Assurance Score for Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A 10-year Analysis.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术质量保证评分的开发与验证:一项为期10年的分析。
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.063. Epub 2016 Aug 1.