Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science , Rehovot , Israel.
Movement Disorders Institute, Department of Neurology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan , Israel.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb 1;121(2):672-689. doi: 10.1152/jn.00788.2017. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The law of intersegmental coordination (Borghese et al. 1996) may be altered in pathological conditions. Here we investigated the contribution of the basal ganglia (BG) and the cerebellum to lower limb intersegmental coordination by inspecting the plane's orientation and other parameters pertinent to this law in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) or cerebellar ataxia (CA). We also applied a mathematical model that successfully accounts for the intersegmental law of coordination observed in control subjects (Barliya et al. 2009). In the present study, we compared the planarity index (PI), covariation plane (CVP) orientation, and CVP orientation predicted by the model in 11 PD patients, 8 CA patients, and two groups of healthy subjects matched for age, height, weight, and gender to each patient group (Ctrl_PD and Ctrl_CA). Controls were instructed to alter their gait speed to match those of their respective patient group. PD patients were examined after overnight withdrawal of anti-parkinsonian medications (PD-off-med) and then on medication (PD-on-med). PI was above 96% in all gait conditions in all groups suggesting that the law of intersegmental coordination is preserved in both BG and cerebellar pathology. However, the measured and predicted CVP orientations rotated in PD-on-med and PD-off-med compared with Ctrl_PD and in CA vs. Ctrl_CA. These rotations caused by PD and CA were in opposite directions suggesting differences in the roles of the BG and cerebellum in intersegmental coordination during human locomotion. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Kinematic and muscular synergies may have a role in overcoming motor redundancies, which may be reflected in intersegmental covariation. Basal ganglia and cerebellar networks were suggested to be involved in crafting and modulating synergies. We thus compared intersegmental coordination in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar disease patients and found opposite effects in some aspects. Further research integrating muscle activities as well as biomechanical and neural control modeling are needed to account for these findings.
节段间协调定律(Borghese 等人,1996 年)可能会在病理条件下发生改变。在这里,我们通过检查与该定律相关的平面方向和其他参数,研究了基底神经节(BG)和小脑对下肢节段间协调的贡献,研究对象为特发性帕金森病(PD)或小脑共济失调(CA)患者。我们还应用了一个数学模型,该模型成功地解释了对照组中观察到的节段间协调定律(Barliya 等人,2009 年)。在本研究中,我们比较了 11 名 PD 患者、8 名 CA 患者和两组与每个患者组相匹配的健康受试者(Ctrl_PD 和 Ctrl_CA)的平面指数(PI)、协变平面(CVP)方向和模型预测的 CVP 方向。要求对照组根据各自的患者组改变步态速度。PD 患者在停药一夜后(PD-off-med)和用药后(PD-on-med)接受检查。在所有组的所有步态条件下,PI 均高于 96%,表明节段间协调定律在 BG 和小脑病变中均得到保留。然而,与 Ctrl_PD 相比,PD-on-med 和 PD-off-med 以及 CA 与 Ctrl_CA 相比,测量和预测的 CVP 方向发生了旋转。这些由 PD 和 CA 引起的旋转方向相反,表明在人类运动中,BG 和小脑在节段间协调中的作用不同。新的和值得注意的是:运动协同可能在克服运动冗余方面发挥作用,这可能反映在节段间协变中。基底神经节和小脑网络被认为参与了协同的构建和调节。因此,我们比较了帕金森病和小脑疾病患者的节段间协调,发现了一些方面的相反影响。需要进一步的研究,整合肌肉活动以及生物力学和神经控制建模,以解释这些发现。