From the Department of Psychology (Lumley), Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and Department of Internal Medicine (Schubiner), Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Ascension Health, and Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, Michigan.
Psychosom Med. 2019 Feb/Mar;81(2):114-124. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000654.
Chronic pain is a significant health problem that is increasing in prevalence, and advances in treatment are needed.
We briefly review the leading evidence-based psychological therapies for chronic pain-cognitive-behavioral and acceptance/mindfulness-based therapies-and examine several limitations and missing perspectives of these approaches. We review six lesser-known interventions that address these limitations, and we describe our integrative model for psychological assessment and treatment of centralized pain. We present a typical patient and describe how we apply this approach, along with challenges to its implementation and possible solutions to these challenges.
Greater pain treatment efficacy may be possible if clinicians: (a) distinguish patients with primarily centralized (i.e., somatoform or nociplastic) pain from those with primarily peripheral (nociceptive, inflammatory, or neuropathic) pain; (b) acknowledge the capacity of the brain not only to modulate pain but also generate as well as attenuate or eliminate centralized pain; (c) consider the powerful role that adverse life experiences and psychological conflicts play in centralized pain; and (d) integrate emotional processing and interpersonal changes into treatment. Our integrative treatment involves delivering a progression of interventions, as needed, to achieve pain reduction: tailored pain neuroscience education, cognitive and mindfulness skills to decrease the pain danger alarm mechanism, behavioral engagement in avoided painful and other feared activities, emotional awareness and expression to reverse emotional avoidance and overcome trauma or psychological conflict, and adaptive communication to decrease interpersonal stress.
This integrative assessment and treatment model has the potential to substantially reduce and sometimes eliminate centralized pain by changing the cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and interpersonal processes that trigger and maintain centralized pain.
慢性疼痛是一种日益普遍的严重健康问题,需要新的治疗方法。
我们简要回顾了慢性疼痛的主要循证心理疗法,即认知行为疗法和接纳/正念疗法,并探讨了这些方法的几个局限性和缺失视角。我们回顾了六种鲜为人知的干预措施,这些措施可以解决这些局限性,并描述了我们对集中性疼痛进行心理评估和治疗的综合模型。我们介绍了一位典型的患者,并描述了我们如何应用这种方法,以及实施过程中遇到的挑战和解决这些挑战的可能方案。
如果临床医生能够做到以下几点,疼痛治疗的效果可能会更好:(a)区分主要为中枢性(即躯体形式或伤害感受性)疼痛的患者与主要为周围性(伤害感受性、炎症性或神经性)疼痛的患者;(b)承认大脑不仅有调节疼痛的能力,还有产生、减弱或消除集中性疼痛的能力;(c)考虑到生活中的不良经历和心理冲突对集中性疼痛的强大影响;(d)将情绪处理和人际关系变化纳入治疗中。我们的综合治疗包括根据需要提供一系列干预措施,以达到减轻疼痛的目的:定制的疼痛神经科学教育、认知和正念技能以减少疼痛危险警报机制、行为上参与避免疼痛和其他恐惧活动、情感意识和表达以逆转情感回避和克服创伤或心理冲突、以及适应性沟通以减少人际压力。
这种综合评估和治疗模型有可能通过改变引发和维持集中性疼痛的认知、行为、情感和人际关系过程,显著减轻甚至有时消除集中性疼痛。