• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气候政策对波兰电力部门的影响评估。

Impact assessment of climate policy on Poland's power sector.

作者信息

Skoczkowski Tadeusz, Bielecki Sławomir, Węglarz Arkadiusz, Włodarczak Magdalena, Gutowski Piotr

机构信息

1Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Heat Engineering, Division of Rational Use of Energy, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 21/25, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.

2Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(8):1303-1349. doi: 10.1007/s11027-018-9786-z. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11027-018-9786-z
PMID:30464705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6223833/
Abstract

This article addresses the impact of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) on Poland's conventional energy sector in 2008-2020 and further till 2050. Poland is a country with over 80% dependence on coal in the power sector being under political pressure of the European Union's (EU) ambitious climate policy. The impact of the increase of the European Emission Allowance (EUA) price on fossil fuel power sector has been modelled for different scenarios. The innovation of this article consists in proposing a methodology of estimation actual costs and benefits of power stations in a country with a heavily coal-dependent power sector in the process of transition to a low-carbon economy. Strong political and economic interdependence of coal and power sector has been demonstrated as well as the impact caused by the EU ETS participation in different technology groups of power plants. It has been shown that gas-fuelled combined heat and power units are less vulnerable to the EU ETS-related costs, whereas the hard coal-fired plants may lose their profitability soon after 2020. Lignite power plants, despite their high emissivity, may longer remain in operation owing to low operational costs. Additionally, the results of long-term, up to 2050, modelling of Poland's energy sector supported an unavoidable need of deep decarbonisation of the power sector to meet the post-Paris climate objectives. It has been concluded that investing in coal-based power capacity may lead to a carbon lock-in of the power sector. Finally, the overall costs of such a transformation have been discussed and confronted with the financial support offered by the EU. The whole consideration has been made in a wide context of changes ongoing globally in energy markets and compared with some other countries seeking transformation paths from coal. Poland's case can serve as a lesson for all countries trying to reduce coal dependence in power generation. Reforms in the energy sector shall from the very beginning be an essential part of a sustainable transition of the whole nation's economy. They must scale the power capacity to the future demand avoiding stranded costs. The reforms must be wide-ranging, based on a wide political consensus and not biased against the coal sector. Future energy mix and corresponding technologies shall be carefully designed, matched and should remain stable in the long-term perspective. Coal-based power capacity being near the end of its lifetime provides an economically viable option to commence a fuel switch and the following technology replacement. Real benefits and costs of the energy transition shall be fairly allocated to all stakeholders and communicated to the society. The social costs and implications in coal-dependent regions may be high, especially in the short-term perspective, but then the transformation will bring profits to the whole society.

摘要

本文探讨了欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)在2008 - 2020年以及直至2050年对波兰传统能源部门的影响。波兰是一个电力部门对煤炭依赖度超过80%的国家,正面临欧盟雄心勃勃的气候政策带来的政治压力。针对不同情景,模拟了欧洲排放配额(EUA)价格上涨对化石燃料电力部门的影响。本文的创新之处在于提出了一种估算在向低碳经济转型过程中,电力部门严重依赖煤炭的国家中发电站实际成本和收益的方法。研究表明了煤炭与电力部门之间强大的政治和经济相互依存关系,以及欧盟排放交易体系参与对不同技术类型发电厂的影响。结果显示,燃气热电联产机组对与欧盟排放交易体系相关的成本不太敏感,而硬煤发电厂可能在2020年后不久就会失去盈利能力。褐煤发电厂尽管排放率高,但由于运营成本低,可能会在更长时间内继续运营。此外,对波兰能源部门直至2050年的长期模拟结果支持了电力部门为实现巴黎气候目标而进行深度脱碳的必然需求。得出的结论是,投资基于煤炭的发电能力可能导致电力部门的碳锁定。最后,讨论了这种转型的总体成本,并与欧盟提供的财政支持进行了对比。整个考量是在全球能源市场正在发生的广泛变化背景下进行的,并与其他一些寻求从煤炭转型路径的国家进行了比较。波兰的案例可以为所有试图减少发电对煤炭依赖的国家提供借鉴。能源部门的改革从一开始就应成为整个国家经济可持续转型的重要组成部分。它们必须根据未来需求调整发电能力,避免搁浅成本。改革必须全面,基于广泛的政治共识,且不偏袒煤炭部门。未来的能源结构和相应技术应经过精心设计、匹配,并应在长期内保持稳定。接近使用寿命末期的基于煤炭的发电能力为开始燃料转换和后续技术替代提供了经济上可行的选择。能源转型的实际收益和成本应公平分配给所有利益相关者,并向社会传达。在依赖煤炭的地区,社会成本和影响可能很高,尤其是在短期内,但随后转型将给整个社会带来收益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/16635f307f4a/11027_2018_9786_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/08a05d002a9a/11027_2018_9786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/f9478605986c/11027_2018_9786_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/2acb22c8a10f/11027_2018_9786_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/4c89533f68dd/11027_2018_9786_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/81f39374ba59/11027_2018_9786_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/213d54827eab/11027_2018_9786_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/feb6f99c0c27/11027_2018_9786_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/90fa976fc983/11027_2018_9786_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/eaed274bb1d1/11027_2018_9786_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/8354e1f7ddc1/11027_2018_9786_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/466697600cbe/11027_2018_9786_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/a4889c66c767/11027_2018_9786_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/e25d8e4f4b9a/11027_2018_9786_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/1d506146ee5c/11027_2018_9786_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/8d0911f7fbbc/11027_2018_9786_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/46f1ee01e3e4/11027_2018_9786_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/57c1c4d92dd5/11027_2018_9786_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/b094964f11c9/11027_2018_9786_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/16635f307f4a/11027_2018_9786_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/08a05d002a9a/11027_2018_9786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/f9478605986c/11027_2018_9786_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/2acb22c8a10f/11027_2018_9786_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/4c89533f68dd/11027_2018_9786_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/81f39374ba59/11027_2018_9786_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/213d54827eab/11027_2018_9786_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/feb6f99c0c27/11027_2018_9786_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/90fa976fc983/11027_2018_9786_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/eaed274bb1d1/11027_2018_9786_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/8354e1f7ddc1/11027_2018_9786_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/466697600cbe/11027_2018_9786_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/a4889c66c767/11027_2018_9786_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/e25d8e4f4b9a/11027_2018_9786_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/1d506146ee5c/11027_2018_9786_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/8d0911f7fbbc/11027_2018_9786_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/46f1ee01e3e4/11027_2018_9786_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/57c1c4d92dd5/11027_2018_9786_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/b094964f11c9/11027_2018_9786_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e796/6223833/16635f307f4a/11027_2018_9786_Fig19_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact assessment of climate policy on Poland's power sector.气候政策对波兰电力部门的影响评估。
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(8):1303-1349. doi: 10.1007/s11027-018-9786-z. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
2
Governing energy while neglecting health - The case of Poland.在治理能源的同时忽视健康——以波兰为例。
Health Policy. 2017 Nov;121(11):1147-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement.应对中国的空气污染和极端气候变化:实施《巴黎气候变化协定》。
Environ Int. 2016 Oct;95:152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.通过碳捕获、地质利用和储存技术实现中国燃煤发电部门的脱碳。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 5;55(19):13164-13173. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01144. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.发电:减少碳排放的选项
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1653-68. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1025.
6
SWITCH-China: A Systems Approach to Decarbonizing China's Power System.SWITCH-China:中国电力系统脱碳的系统方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 7;50(11):5467-73. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01345. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Multi-objective optimization of coal-fired power units considering deep peaking regulation in China.考虑中国深度调峰的燃煤发电机组多目标优化
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10756-10774. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22628-2. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.能源化利用木材废料:二氧化碳减排量的估算。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.059. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
Analysis of the efficiency and structure of energy consumption in the industrial sector in the European Union countries between 1995 and 2019.分析 1995 年至 2019 年间欧盟国家工业部门能源消耗的效率和结构。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 20;808:152052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152052. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Exploring the impact of transition in energy mix on the CO emissions from China's power generation sector based on IDA and SDA.基于IDA 和 SDA 探究中国发电行业能源结构转型对 CO2 排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(24):30858-30872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12599-1. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The projected impact of the inflation reduction act's climate provisions on cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes.《降低通胀法案》气候条款对心血管和呼吸系统疾病转归的预计影响。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Jul 10;19:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100707. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry.欧盟钢铁行业脱碳方案的技术创新系统分析
Energy (Oxf). 2020 Dec 1;212:118688. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118688. Epub 2020 Aug 28.