• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价分析机器人与经肛门微创手术在全直肠系膜切除术(TME)中的应用- 对直肠癌手术挑战方面的当前文献的系统评价。

Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.010
PMID:30470529
Abstract

Several patients' and pathological characteristics in rectal surgery can significantly complicate surgical loco regional tumor clearance. The main factors are obesity, short tumor distance from anal verge, bulky tumors, and narrow pelvis, which have been shown to be associated to poor surgical results in open and laparoscopic approaches. Minimally invasive surgery has the potential to reduce perioperative morbidity with equivalent short- and long-term oncological outcomes compared to conventional open approach. Achilles' heel of laparoscopic approaches is conversion to open surgery. High risk for conversion is evident for patients with bulky and low tumors as well as male gender and narrow pelvis. Hence, patient's characteristics represent challenges in rectal cancer surgery especially in minimally invasive approaches. The available surgical techniques increased remarkably with recently developed and implemented improvements of minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. The controversial discussions about sense and purpose of these novel approaches are still ongoing in the literature. Herein, we evaluate, if latest technical advances like transanal approach or robotic assisted surgery have the potential to overcome known challenges and pitfalls in rectal cancer surgery in demanding surgical cases and highlight the role of current minimally invasive approaches in rectal cancer surgery.

摘要

在直肠外科手术中,一些患者和病理特征会显著增加手术局部区域肿瘤清除的难度。主要因素包括肥胖、肿瘤距肛门缘的距离短、肿瘤体积大以及骨盆狭窄,这些因素已被证明与开放和腹腔镜手术的不良手术结果相关。与传统的开放手术相比,微创手术具有降低围手术期发病率的潜力,并且短期和长期的肿瘤学结果相当。腹腔镜手术的弱点是转为开放性手术。对于体积大且位置低的肿瘤、男性和骨盆狭窄的患者,转换风险较高。因此,患者的特征在直肠癌手术中尤其是微创手术中是一个挑战。随着最近微创直肠癌手术技术的改进和实施,可用的手术技术显著增加。关于这些新方法的意义和目的的争议性讨论在文献中仍在继续。在此,我们评估了经肛门入路或机器人辅助手术等最新技术进步是否有可能克服在高难度手术中直肠癌手术中已知的挑战和陷阱,并强调了当前微创方法在直肠癌手术中的作用。

相似文献

1
Systematic review analysis of robotic and transanal approaches in TME surgery- A systematic review of the current literature in regard to challenges in rectal cancer surgery.系统评价分析机器人与经肛门微创手术在全直肠系膜切除术(TME)中的应用- 对直肠癌手术挑战方面的当前文献的系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
2
Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision of Rectal Neoplasia: Clinical Experience With 58 Consecutive Patients.经肛门机器人微创手术切除直肠肿瘤:58 例连续患者的临床经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Mar;62(3):279-285. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001223.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.经肛门直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门手术的系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003227.
5
[Robotic surgical approach for rectal cancer].[直肠癌的机器人手术入路]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):345-349. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200212-00051.
6
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.机器人手术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(TME)在保留括约肌手术中的应用:经肛门TME直肠入路有何差异?:单中心120例连续患者系列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1594-600. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5048-4. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery.直肠手术陷阱相关机器人手术方法的评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches.直肠癌的手术入路:一项比较开腹、腹腔镜、机器人和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.037. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
9
Initial Experience with Transition from Open to Robotic-assisted Proctectomy for Patients with Rectal Cancer.直肠癌患者从开放手术过渡到机器人辅助直肠切除术的初步经验。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Nov;23(11):731-734.
10
Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (ETM) through transanal approach (TaETM) with robotic and Transanal Endoscopic Operations (TEO) combined access: step by step surgery.经肛门入路采用机器人辅助和经肛门内镜手术(TEO)联合入路进行全直肠系膜切除(ETM)的经肛门微创手术:分步手术
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Apr-Jun;28(2):117-20. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000200008.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of rectal cancer surgery outcomes in the United States: the influence of hospital volume on rates of sphincter preservation before and after practice standardization.美国直肠癌手术结局的优化:医院手术量对实践标准化前后保肛率的影响。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 May 27;38(4):375-386. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2503653. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term functional and prognostic outcomes of robotic intersphincteric resection for treating low rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study.机器人括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的长期功能和预后结果:一项单中心回顾性研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 27;40(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04844-7.
3
Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 1;28(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02947-x.
4
Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Expedited Summary of the Clinical Evidence.机器人辅助直肠癌手术:临床证据速览
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024 Apr 8;24(3):1-45. eCollection 2024.
5
Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: A systematic review.直肠癌患者经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜与机器人辅助手术的经济学分析:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289090. eCollection 2023.
6
Feasibility of Perineal Defect Reconstruction with Simplified Fasciocutaneous Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flaps after Tumor Resection of the Lower Rectum: Incidence and Outcome in an Interdisciplinary Approach.下直肠肿瘤切除术后采用简化臀下动脉穿支(IGAP)筋膜皮瓣修复会阴缺损的可行性:多学科方法的发生率及结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;15(13):3345. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133345.
7
Clinical feasibility of the therapeutic strategies total neoadjuvant therapy and "watch and wait" in the treatment of rectal cancer patients with recurrence after clinical complete response.全新辅助治疗和“观察等待”治疗策略在临床完全缓解后复发的直肠癌患者治疗中的临床可行性
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 16;9:1006624. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1006624. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study considering procedural safety, pathological safety, and efficiency.评估机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线:考虑手术安全性、病理安全性和效率的多中心研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 11;38(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04303-7.
9
Prospective multicentre observational cohort to assess quality of life, functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness following minimally invasive surgical techniques for rectal cancer in 'dedicated centres' in the Netherlands (VANTAGE trial): a protocol.前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究,评估荷兰“专门中心”采用微创技术治疗直肠癌的生活质量、功能结果和成本效益(VANTAGE 试验):方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e057640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057640.
10
Cost analysis and cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: a protocol for a systematic review.直肠癌患者开腹手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人辅助手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的成本分析及成本效果比较:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 18;12(8):e057803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057803.