Department of Chemistry , Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut 06520 , United States.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Swarthmore College , Swarthmore , Pennsylvania 19081 , United States.
J Org Chem. 2018 Dec 21;83(24):15463-15469. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b02740. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
The problem of deriving atomic charges from the results of ab Initio MO calculations has been studied by the use of several reported methods: Mulliken population analysis, the minimal basis set (MBS) procedure, the natural population analysis (NPA), two electrostatic potential fitting methods, M-K and ChelpG, the Hirshfeld population analysis, and CM5 (charge model 5), which is related to the Hirshfeld method. The first set of studies were concerned with hydrogen charges. It was found that the MBS charges were linearly related to the Hirshfeld charges. The Hirshfeld, CM5, and MBS methods, but not the others, provided an excellent correlation for H atomic charge with the H-C-H bond angle, and with calculated gas-phase acidity. The two methods that were linearly related and gave hydrogen charges in agreement with an experimental study of partially deuterated methanes are MBS and Hirshfeld. In order to see which of the two methods is the more satisfactory, the methanol dimer was examined. The calculated H bond energy was 6.2 kcal/mol, which was in good agreement with studies of hydrogen bonds. The Coulombic interaction for the O···H bond was estimated using the MBS and Hirshfeld charges. The latter gave a calculated energy of 3-6 kcal/mol, whereas MBS gave an energy of ∼35 kcal/mol. Clearly, the Hirshfeld method is more satisfactory and should be the method of choice.
从从头算(ab Initio)MO 计算结果推导出原子电荷的问题已经通过使用几种已报道的方法进行了研究:Mulliken 布居分析、最小基组(MBS)程序、自然布居分析(NPA)、两种静电势拟合方法(M-K 和 ChelpG)、Hirshfeld 布居分析和与 Hirshfeld 方法相关的 CM5(电荷模型 5)。第一组研究涉及氢电荷。结果发现,MBS 电荷与 Hirshfeld 电荷呈线性相关。Hirshfeld、CM5 和 MBS 方法(但不是其他方法)与 H-C-H 键角和计算的气相酸度提供了出色的 H 原子电荷相关性,且与部分氘代甲烷的实验研究一致。与实验研究一致的两种线性相关且给出氢电荷的方法是 MBS 和 Hirshfeld。为了确定这两种方法中哪一种更令人满意,研究了甲醇二聚体。计算的 H 键能为 6.2 kcal/mol,与氢键的研究非常吻合。使用 MBS 和 Hirshfeld 电荷估计了 O···H 键的库仑相互作用。后者给出了 3-6 kcal/mol 的计算能量,而 MBS 给出了约 35 kcal/mol 的能量。显然,Hirshfeld 方法更令人满意,应该是首选方法。