Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Analytical-Chemistry Group, van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Division of BioAnalytical Chemistry, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lab Chip. 2018 Dec 18;19(1):35-49. doi: 10.1039/c8lc00826d.
3D printing has emerged as a valuable approach for the fabrication of fluidic devices and may replace soft-lithography as the method of choice for rapid prototyping. The potential of this disruptive technology is much greater than this - it allows for functional integration in a single, highly automated manufacturing step in a cost and time effective manner. Integration of functionality with a 3D printer can be done through spatial configuration of a single material, inserting pre-made components mid-print in a print-pause-print approach, and/or through the precise spatial deposition of different materials with a multimaterial printer. This review provides an overview on the ways in which 3D printing has been exploited to create and use fluidic devices with different functionality, which provides a basis for critical reflection on the current deficiencies and future opportunities for integration by 3D printing.
3D 打印已成为制造流控设备的一种有价值的方法,它可能会取代软光刻成为快速原型制作的首选方法。这项颠覆性技术的潜力远不止于此——它可以在一个成本和时间效益高的单一、高度自动化的制造步骤中实现功能集成。通过在单个材料中进行空间配置、在打印暂停打印的方法中插入预制组件,以及/或者通过使用多材料打印机精确地空间沉积不同的材料,都可以实现与 3D 打印机的功能集成。本文综述了 3D 打印在创建和使用具有不同功能的流控设备方面的应用,为通过 3D 打印进行集成的当前缺陷和未来机会提供了批判性思考的基础。