Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Dermatology of Korean Medicine, Graduate School of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Department of Korean Medical Science, Graduate School of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea; Acupuncture & Meridian Science Research Centre, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Complement Ther Med. 2018 Dec;41:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
To assess the feasibility of a definitive trial investigating the effects of acupuncture on atopic dermatitis symptoms including itching.
A randomized, sham-controlled preliminary trial with three arms with a 4-week intervention period and a 4-week follow-up.
Thirty participants were allocated to three arms (the verum acupuncture group 1 [VA1, 3 times weekly for 4 weeks], the verum acupuncture group 2 [VA2, twice weekly for 4 weeks], and the sham acupuncture group [SA, twice weekly for 4 weeks]) at a 1:1:1 ratio.
We determined the visual analogue scale (VAS) for itching and insomnia, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores over the course of the study. Baseline index score (BIS) comparison according to general symptom was performed.
The SCORAD, VAS (Pruritus), VAS (Insomnia), POEM, DLQI, and EASI were significantly improved in the VA groups. Significant BIS mean differences were observed most predominantly in epigastric tenderness and dyspepsia. There was no significant difference between VA1 and VA2 groups in all the main evaluation indices.
For the following research, the authors suggest SCORAD (Total) as primary outcome and SCORAD (objective), VAS (Itch), VAS (insomnia), EASI, POEM, and DLQI as secondary outcomes. Thirty six participants should be conducted a 4-week acupuncture period (twice weekly) and a 4-week follow-up. It is necessary to compare the differences of general symptoms according to presence of epigastric tenderness or dyspepsia at the screening level.
评估针刺治疗特应性皮炎瘙痒症状的疗效的确证性试验的可行性。
一项随机、假对照初步试验,分为三组,干预期为 4 周,随访期为 4 周。
30 名参与者按照 1:1:1 的比例分配到三组(真针刺组 1 [VA1,每周 3 次,共 4 周]、真针刺组 2 [VA2,每周 2 次,共 4 周]和假针刺组 [SA,每周 2 次,共 4 周])。
我们在研究过程中确定了瘙痒和失眠的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、特应性皮炎评分(SCORAD)、湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、患者导向湿疹量表(POEM)和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分。根据一般症状进行基线指数评分(BIS)比较。
VA 组的 SCORAD、VAS(瘙痒)、VAS(失眠)、POEM、DLQI 和 EASI 均显著改善。在胃脘痛和消化不良方面,观察到 BIS 均值差异有显著意义。VA1 组和 VA2 组在所有主要评价指标中均无显著差异。
对于后续研究,作者建议将 SCORAD(总)作为主要结局,将 SCORAD(客观)、VAS(瘙痒)、VAS(失眠)、EASI、POEM 和 DLQI 作为次要结局。应进行 4 周的针刺期(每周 2 次)和 4 周的随访。有必要在筛查水平上根据胃脘痛或消化不良的存在比较一般症状的差异。