de Lusignan Simon, McGee Christopher, Webb Rebecca, Joy Mark, Byford Rachel, Yonova Ivelina, Hriskova Mariya, Matos Ferreira Filipa, Elliot Alex J, Smith Gillian, Rafi Imran
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, London, United Kingdom.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Nov 26;4(4):e11354. doi: 10.2196/11354.
Living in a conurbation, urban, or rural environment is an important determinant of health. For example, conurbation and rural living is associated with increased respiratory and allergic conditions, whereas a farm or rural upbringing has been shown to be a protective factor against this.
The objective of the study was to assess differences in general practice presentations of allergic and infectious disease in those exposed to conurbation or urban living compared with rural environments.
The population was a nationally representative sample of 175 English general practices covering a population of over 1.6 million patients registered with sentinel network general practices. General practice presentation rates per 100,000 population were reported for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and infectious conditions grouped into upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infection, and acute gastroenteritis by the UK Office for National Statistics urban-rural category. We used multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, comorbidities, and smoking status, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs.
For allergic rhinitis, the OR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23; P=.003) for urban and 1.29 (95% CI 1.19-1.41; P<.001) for conurbation compared with rural dwellers. Conurbation living was associated with a lower OR for both asthma (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73; P<.001) and lower respiratory tract infections (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P=.005). Compared with rural dwellers, the OR for upper respiratory tract infection was greater in urban (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08; P<.001) but no different in conurbation dwellers (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03; P=.93). Acute gastroenteritis followed the same pattern: the OR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.25; P=.03) for urban dwellers and 1.04 (95% CI 0.93-1.17; P=.46) for conurbation dwellers. The OR for urinary tract infection was lower for urban dwellers (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; P=.02) but higher in conurbation dwellers (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13; P=.04).
Those living in conurbations or urban areas were more likely to consult a general practice for allergic rhinitis and upper respiratory tract infection. Both conurbation and rural living were associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection. Living in rural areas was associated with an increased risk of asthma and lower respiratory tract infections. The data suggest that living environment may affect rates of consultations for certain conditions. Longitudinal analyses of these data would be useful in providing insights into important determinants.
生活在大都市、城市或农村环境中是健康的一个重要决定因素。例如,生活在大都市和农村与呼吸道及过敏性疾病增多有关,而在农场长大或农村成长环境已被证明是抵御此类疾病的一个保护因素。
本研究的目的是评估与农村环境相比,暴露于大都市或城市生活环境中的人群在全科医疗中出现的过敏性和感染性疾病的差异。
研究人群是来自英国全国175家全科医疗诊所的具有代表性的样本,覆盖超过160万在哨点网络全科医疗诊所注册的患者。英国国家统计局按城乡类别将过敏性鼻炎、哮喘以及分为上呼吸道感染、下呼吸道感染、尿路感染和急性肠胃炎的感染性疾病按每10万人的全科医疗就诊率进行报告。我们使用多变量逻辑回归,对年龄、性别、种族、贫困程度、合并症和吸烟状况进行调整,报告比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
与农村居民相比,城市居民患过敏性鼻炎的OR为1.13(9且5%CI为1.04 - 1.23;P = 0.003),大都市居民为1.29(95%CI为1.19 - 1.41;P < 0.001)。生活在大都市与哮喘(OR 0.70,95%CI 0.67 - 0.73;P < 0.001)和下呼吸道感染(OR 0.94,95%CI为0.90 - 0.98;P = 0.005)的较低OR相关。与农村居民相比,城市居民上呼吸道感染的OR更高(OR 1.06,95%CI为1.03 - 1.08;P < 0.001),但大都市居民无差异(OR 1.00,95%CI为0.97 - 1.03;P = 0.93)。急性肠胃炎呈现相同模式:城市居民的OR为1.13(95%CI为1.01 - 1.25;P = 0.03),大都市居民为1.04(95%CI为0.93 - 1.17;P = 0.46)。城市居民尿路感染的OR较低(OR 0.94,95%CI为0.89 - 0.99;P = 0.02),但大都市居民较高(OR 1.06,95%CI为1.00 - 1.13;P = ;04)。
生活在大都市或城市地区的人因过敏性鼻炎和上呼吸道感染而到全科医疗就诊的可能性更大。大都市和农村生活都与尿路感染风险增加有关。生活在农村地区与哮喘和下呼吸道感染风险增加有关。数据表明生活环境可能影响某些疾病的就诊率。对这些数据进行纵向分析将有助于深入了解重要的决定因素。