• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童在法庭访谈中对是与否的任何/有些问题的回答中的详述和否认。

Elaborations and Denials in Children's Responses to Yes-No Any/Some Questions in Forensic Interviews.

机构信息

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):407-416. doi: 10.1177/10775595231154552. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/10775595231154552
PMID:36724093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10878369/
Abstract

This study examined 379 4- to 12-year-old children's answers to any/some and other yes-no questions in forensic interviews about sexual abuse ( = 10,041). Yes-no questions that include the terms any/some (e.g., "Did he say anything?") often implicitly ask for elaboration when the answer is yes ("What did he say?"). However, children may give unelaborated responses to yes-no questions, fail to recognize implicit requests, and falsely respond "no." As predicted, children gave more wh- elaborations in response to any/some questions than other yes-no questions, but younger children elaborated less often than older children. Also as predicted, children responded "no" more often to any/some questions than to other yes-no questions, and more often to "any" than to "some" questions. "No" responses were also more common when children were asked potentially vague anything/something questions and else/other/different questions. The results highlight the potential risks of asking children any/some questions.

摘要

本研究调查了 379 名 4 至 12 岁儿童在性虐待法医访谈中对任何/一些和其他是/否问题的回答(= 10041)。包含任何/一些(例如,“他说了什么?”)的是/否问题,当答案为“是”时,通常会隐含地要求进一步说明(“他说了什么?”)。然而,儿童可能会对是/否问题给出未经阐述的回答,未能识别隐含的请求,并错误地回答“否”。正如预测的那样,儿童对任何/一些问题的 wh-阐述比其他是/否问题更多,但年幼的儿童比年长的儿童更不常阐述。同样如预测的那样,儿童对任何/一些问题的回答比其他是/否问题更频繁,对“任何”问题的回答比对“一些”问题更频繁。当被问及潜在模糊的任何/某事问题和其他/其他/不同问题时,“否”的回答也更为常见。研究结果强调了询问儿童任何/一些问题的潜在风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a90f/10878369/f402b99d5902/nihms-1967005-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a90f/10878369/f402b99d5902/nihms-1967005-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a90f/10878369/f402b99d5902/nihms-1967005-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Elaborations and Denials in Children's Responses to Yes-No Any/Some Questions in Forensic Interviews.儿童在法庭访谈中对是与否的任何/有些问题的回答中的详述和否认。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):407-416. doi: 10.1177/10775595231154552. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Children's Elaborated Responses to Yes-No Questions in Forensic Interviews About Sexual Abuse.儿童在性虐待法医访谈中对是非问题的详细回应。
Child Maltreat. 2024 Nov;29(4):637-647. doi: 10.1177/10775595231220228. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Suppositional Wh-Questions About Perceptions, Conversations, and actions are More Productive than Paired Yes-No Questions when Questioning Maltreated Children.当询问受虐儿童时,关于感知、对话和行为的假设性 Wh- 问题比配对的是/否问题更有成效。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Feb;28(1):55-65. doi: 10.1177/10775595211067208. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses "Do You Know/Remember" Questions.律师询问儿童证人“你知道/记得”类问题时的语用失误与指称歧义
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):191-199. doi: 10.1037/law0000116. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
5
Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.儿童对性虐待的披露:从直接询问中学习。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 May;35(5):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.014.
6
Child Witnesses Productively Respond to "How" Questions About Evaluations but Struggle With Other "How" Questions.儿童证人可以有效地回答关于评估的“如何”问题,但在其他“如何”问题上则存在困难。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):417-426. doi: 10.1177/10775595231175913. Epub 2023 May 14.
7
Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations.询问与告知:当询问儿童证人关于对话的情况时可能存在的混淆。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Dec;23(4):447-459. doi: 10.1037/xap0000136. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
8
The utility of direct questions in eliciting subjective content from children disclosing sexual abuse.直接提问在诱使披露性虐待的儿童提供主观内容方面的效用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 1):103964. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
Attorneys' Questions and Children's Responses Referring to the Nature of Sexual Touch in Child Sexual Abuse Trials.律师提问与儿童在儿童性虐待审判中对性接触性质的回答。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Aug;28(3):438-449. doi: 10.1177/10775595231161033. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
10
Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications.空间语言、问题类型与幼儿描述衣物的能力:法律和发展的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):398-409. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000237. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comparative Productivity of the Birthday Narrative in 6- to 11-year-Old Maltreated Children.6至11岁受虐待儿童生日叙事的比较生产力
Child Maltreat. 2025 May;30(2):221-228. doi: 10.1177/10775595241264279. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Forensic interviewers' difficulty with the birthday narrative.法医访谈员在生日叙述方面的困难。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jun;152:106752. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106752. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Children's Elaborated Responses to Yes-No Questions in Forensic Interviews About Sexual Abuse.儿童在性虐待法医访谈中对是非问题的详细回应。
Child Maltreat. 2024 Nov;29(4):637-647. doi: 10.1177/10775595231220228. Epub 2023 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Suppositional Wh-Questions About Perceptions, Conversations, and actions are More Productive than Paired Yes-No Questions when Questioning Maltreated Children.当询问受虐儿童时,关于感知、对话和行为的假设性 Wh- 问题比配对的是/否问题更有成效。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Feb;28(1):55-65. doi: 10.1177/10775595211067208. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Imprecision About Body Mechanics When Child Witnesses Are Questioned About Sexual Abuse.儿童性虐待案件询问中对身体力学的不精确把握。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP12375-NP12397. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997941. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Challenging the Credibility of Alleged Victims of Child Sexual Abuse in Scottish Courts.质疑苏格兰法庭上儿童性虐待指控受害者的可信度。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):200-210. doi: 10.1037/law0000117. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Children's Conversational Memory Regarding a Minor Transgression and a Subsequent Interview.儿童关于轻微违规行为及后续访谈的对话记忆
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Aug;24(3):379-392. doi: 10.1037/law0000176. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
'Where were your clothes?' Eliciting descriptions of clothing placement from children alleging sexual abuse in criminal trials and forensic interviews.“你的衣服在哪里?”在刑事审判和法医询问中,从声称遭受性虐待的儿童那里获取衣物放置情况的描述。
Legal Criminol Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(2):197-212. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12094. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses "Do You Know/Remember" Questions.律师询问儿童证人“你知道/记得”类问题时的语用失误与指称歧义
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):191-199. doi: 10.1037/law0000116. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Talking past each other: Interviewer and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews.各说各话:法医询问中访谈者与儿童的言语交流
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Apr;40(2):107-17. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000171. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
Attorneys' Questions and Children's Productivity in Child Sexual Abuse Criminal Trials.儿童性虐待刑事审判中律师的提问与儿童的作证表现
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):780-788. doi: 10.1002/acp.3048.
9
Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.幼儿在间接言语行为方面的困难:对询问儿童证人的启示。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):775-88. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2142. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
How Attorneys Question Children About the Dynamics of Sexual Abuse and Disclosure in Criminal Trials.律师在刑事审判中如何询问儿童关于性虐待的情况及披露过程。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2014 Jan 1;20(1):19-30. doi: 10.1037/a0035000.