• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从发病率和死亡率到质量改进:结构化互动式耳鼻喉科会议的效果

From Morbidity and Mortality to Quality Improvement: Effects of a Structured and Interactive Otolaryngology Conference.

作者信息

Spielman Daniel B, Hsueh Wayne D, Choi Karen Y, Bent John P

机构信息

Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2017 Mar 16;1(1):2473974X17692775. doi: 10.1177/2473974X17692775. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.1177/2473974X17692775
PMID:30480176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6239051/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Measure the effects of a structured morbidity and mortality conference format on the attitudes of resident and faculty participants.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency training program.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Two changes were implemented to the structure of our morbidity and mortality conference: (1) we adopted a recently described presentation framework called situation-background-assessment-recommendation and (2) appointed a faculty moderator to lead the conference. Surveys were distributed to residents and faculty before and after these modifications were implemented to measure changes in attitude of conference attendees.

RESULTS

After implementing the above changes to the morbidity and mortality conference, participant engagement increased from "moderately engaged" to "extremely engaged" ( < .01). Among both faculty and residents, the perceived educational value of conference also improved from "moderately educational" to "extremely educational" ( < .01). Finally in the attending cohort, the impact on future patient care increased from "no change" to "greatly enhanced" ( < .01).

CONCLUSION

By implementing the situation-background-assessment-recommendation framework and appointing a faculty moderator to morbidity and mortality conference, participants reported significantly enhanced engagement during the conference, increased educational value of the session, and a positive impact on future patient care.

摘要

目的

衡量结构化的发病率与死亡率研讨会形式对住院医师和教员参与者态度的影响。

研究设计

前瞻性队列研究。

研究地点

耳鼻咽喉 - 头颈外科住院医师培训项目。

研究对象与方法

对我们的发病率与死亡率研讨会结构进行了两项改变:(1)我们采用了一种最近描述的称为情况 - 背景 - 评估 - 建议的展示框架;(2)指定一名教员主持人来主持研讨会。在实施这些修改之前和之后,向住院医师和教员发放调查问卷,以衡量会议参与者态度的变化。

结果

对发病率与死亡率研讨会实施上述改变后,参与者的参与度从“适度参与”提高到“极度参与”(P <.01)。在教员和住院医师中,研讨会的感知教育价值也从“适度有教育意义”提高到“极具教育意义”(P <.01)。最后,在主治医生群体中,对未来患者护理的影响从“无变化”提高到“大幅增强”(P <.01)。

结论

通过在发病率与死亡率研讨会上实施情况 - 背景 - 评估 - 建议框架并指定一名教员主持人,参与者报告称会议期间的参与度显著提高,会议的教育价值增加,并且对未来患者护理产生了积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/f7229491ca08/10.1177_2473974X17692775-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/9fecbffa79d5/10.1177_2473974X17692775-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/ce8a7b6e2ac8/10.1177_2473974X17692775-img1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/f7229491ca08/10.1177_2473974X17692775-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/9fecbffa79d5/10.1177_2473974X17692775-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/ce8a7b6e2ac8/10.1177_2473974X17692775-img1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f232/6239051/f7229491ca08/10.1177_2473974X17692775-img2.jpg

相似文献

1
From Morbidity and Mortality to Quality Improvement: Effects of a Structured and Interactive Otolaryngology Conference.从发病率和死亡率到质量改进:结构化互动式耳鼻喉科会议的效果
OTO Open. 2017 Mar 16;1(1):2473974X17692775. doi: 10.1177/2473974X17692775. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
2
Integrating Morbidity and Mortality Core Competencies and Quality Improvement in Otolaryngology.将发病率和死亡率核心能力与耳鼻喉科质量改进相结合。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb 1;143(2):135-140. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2910.
3
Enhancing the Educational Value and Faculty Attendance of a Morbidity and Mortality Conference.提高发病率与死亡率研讨会的教育价值及教员参与度。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul-Aug;77(4):905-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: a prospective intervention study.提高手术发病率和死亡率会议的质量:一项前瞻性干预研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):824-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f87fe.
5
The utility of the matrix format for surgical morbidity and mortality conference.矩阵形式在外科发病率和死亡率会议中的效用。
Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):503-6.
6
Use of Structured Presentation Formatting and NSQIP Guidelines Improves Quality of Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference.使用结构化报告格式和 NSQIP 指南可提高外科手术并发症和死亡率会议的质量。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.059. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
7
Increased interactive format for Morbidity & Mortality conference improves educational value and enhances confidence.发病率与死亡率会议采用更多互动形式,提高了教育价值并增强了信心。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Sep-Oct;64(5):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.06.007.
8
Learning from errors: Implementation of a resident-oriented radiology morbidity and mortality conference as an educational tool.从错误中学习:将以住院医师为导向的放射科发病率和死亡率会议作为教育工具的实施。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Apr;84:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
A Novel Standardized Morbidity and Mortality Process to Promote Discourse, Improve Education, and Facilitate Practice Change: The M-PROVE Model.一种促进交流、改进教育和促进实践变革的新型标准化发病率和死亡率流程:M-PROVE 模型。
Urol Pract. 2023 Jul;10(4):391-397. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000411. Epub 2023 May 10.
10
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the quality of surgical morbidity and mortality conference using a standardized reporting and assessment tool: a validation study from a large academic medical center in the United States.使用标准化报告和评估工具提高手术发病率和死亡率会议的质量:来自美国一家大型学术医疗中心的验证研究
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Apr 4;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00433-3.
2
When Things Go Wrong: A Guide to the Medical, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Surgical Complications.当出现问题时:手术并发症的医学、伦理和法律层面指南
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Dec 4;8(12). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00004. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating Morbidity and Mortality Core Competencies and Quality Improvement in Otolaryngology.将发病率和死亡率核心能力与耳鼻喉科质量改进相结合。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb 1;143(2):135-140. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2910.
2
Quality Improvement in Otolaryngology Residency: Survey of Program Directors.耳鼻咽喉科住院医师培训中的质量改进:项目主任调查
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb;154(2):349-54. doi: 10.1177/0194599815616110. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Morbidity and Mortality Conference 2.0.发病率与死亡率研讨会2.0
A Survey-Based Assessment of the Practices Governing Morbidity and Mortality Conferences and the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
基于调查的发病率和死亡率会议管理实践及新冠疫情影响评估
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Dec 19;13:1515-1523. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S392653. eCollection 2022.
4
Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey.儿科临床医生对讨论诊断错误以提高患者安全的舒适度:一项调查。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Feb 27;5(2):e259. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
5
Morbidity and mortality meetings to improve patient safety: a survey of 109 consultant surgeons in London, United Kingdom.旨在提高患者安全的发病率和死亡率会议:对英国伦敦109位外科顾问医生的调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Aug 19;13:27. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0207-3. eCollection 2019.
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):228-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001268.
4
Embedding quality and safety in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery education.将质量与安全融入耳鼻咽喉头颈外科手术教育之中。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 May;152(5):778-82. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561601. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: a prospective intervention study.提高手术发病率和死亡率会议的质量:一项前瞻性干预研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):824-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f87fe.
6
SBAR M&M: a feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess the quality of, surgical morbidity and mortality conference presentations.SBAR 案例讨论:评估外科发病率和死亡率会议演示质量的一种可行、可靠且有效的工具。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
7
Improvement in educational effectiveness of morbidity and mortality conferences with structured presentation and analysis of complications.通过结构化呈现和分析并发症,提高发病与死亡率会议的教育效果。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
8
Increased interactive format for Morbidity & Mortality conference improves educational value and enhances confidence.发病率与死亡率会议采用更多互动形式,提高了教育价值并增强了信心。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Sep-Oct;64(5):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.06.007.
9
National survey of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences.全国外科发病率和死亡率会议调查
Am J Surg. 2006 May;191(5):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.029.
10
The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.人为因素:有效团队合作与沟通在提供安全护理方面的至关重要性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i85-90. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i85.