Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Operations, Innovation and Data Sciences, ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2847-2869. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1165-x.
Single-case data often contain trends. Accordingly, to account for baseline trend, several data-analytical techniques extrapolate it into the subsequent intervention phase. Such extrapolation led to forecasts that were smaller than the minimal possible value in 40% of the studies published in 2015 that we reviewed. To avoid impossible predicted values, we propose extrapolating a damping trend, when necessary. Furthermore, we propose a criterion for determining whether extrapolation is warranted and, if so, how far out it is justified to extrapolate a baseline trend. This criterion is based on the baseline phase length and the goodness of fit of the trend line to the data. These proposals were implemented in a modified version of an analytical technique called Mean phase difference. We used both real and generated data to illustrate how unjustified extrapolations may lead to inappropriate quantifications of effect, whereas our proposals help avoid these issues. The new techniques are implemented in a user-friendly website via the Shiny application, offering both graphical and numerical information. Finally, we point to an alternative not requiring either trend line fitting or extrapolation.
单病例数据通常包含趋势。因此,为了说明基线趋势,有几种数据分析技术将其外推到后续的干预阶段。这种外推导致了预测值小于我们审查的 2015 年发表的研究中 40%的最小可能值。为了避免出现不可能的预测值,我们建议在必要时外推阻尼趋势。此外,我们提出了一个确定是否需要外推以及如果需要外推的标准,以推断基线趋势。该标准基于基线阶段的长度和趋势线与数据的拟合程度。这些建议已在一种名为 Mean phase difference 的分析技术的修改版本中实施。我们使用真实数据和生成数据来说明不恰当的外推如何可能导致对效果的不恰当量化,而我们的建议有助于避免这些问题。新的技术通过 Shiny 应用程序在一个用户友好的网站上实现,提供图形和数字信息。最后,我们指出了一种不需要趋势线拟合或外推的替代方法。