1 University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
2 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):232-246. doi: 10.1177/0022219418815646. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
This study set out to compare patterns of relationships among phonological skills, orthographic skills, semantic knowledge, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension in English as a first language (EL1) and English language learners (ELL) students and to test the applicability of the lexical quality hypothesis framework. Participants included 94 EL1 and 178 ELL Grade 5 students from diverse home-language backgrounds. Latent profile analyses conducted separately for ELLs and EL1s provided support for the lexical quality hypothesis in both groups, with the emergence of two profiles: A poor comprehenders profile was associated with poor word-reading-related skills (phonological awareness and orthographic processing) and with poor language-related skills (semantic knowledge and, to a lesser extent, listening comprehension). The good comprehenders profile was associated with average or above-average performance across the component skills, demonstrating that good reading comprehension is the result of strong phonological and orthographic processing skills as well as strong semantic and listening comprehension skills. The good and poor comprehenders profiles were highly similar for ELL and EL1 groups. Conversely, poor comprehenders struggled with these same component skills. Implications for assessment and future research are discussed.
本研究旨在比较英语作为第一语言(EL1)和英语学习者(ELL)学生的语音技能、正字法技能、语义知识、听力理解和阅读理解之间关系的模式,并检验词汇质量假说框架的适用性。参与者包括来自不同家庭语言背景的 94 名 EL1 和 178 名 ELL 五年级学生。为 ELL 和 EL1 分别进行的潜在剖面分析为两组都提供了词汇质量假说的支持,出现了两种模式:较差的阅读理解者模式与较差的与阅读相关的技能(语音意识和正字法处理)和较差的语言相关技能(语义知识,在较小程度上还有听力理解)相关。较好的阅读理解者模式与各组成技能的平均或以上水平相关,表明良好的阅读理解是强大的语音和正字法处理技能以及强大的语义和听力理解技能的结果。良好和较差的阅读理解者模式在 ELL 和 EL1 组中非常相似。相反,较差的阅读理解者在这些相同的组成技能上存在困难。讨论了对评估和未来研究的影响。