Department of Curriculum & Instruction, College of Education, University of Houston, 3657 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Department of Applied Psychology & Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ann Dyslexia. 2021 Jul;71(2):299-321. doi: 10.1007/s11881-021-00214-4. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
This study examined the sources of reading comprehension difficulties in English language learners (ELLs). The characteristics of ELL poor comprehenders were compared to their English as a first language (EL1) peers. Participants included 124 ELLs who spoke Chinese as an L1 and 79 EL1 students. Using a regression technique based on age, non-verbal reasoning, word reading accuracy, and word reading fluency, three types of comprehenders (poor, average, and good) were identified within each language group. The groups were then compared on measures of oral language skills (vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, and listening comprehension), metalinguistic skills (morphological awareness and syntactic awareness), working memory, and higher-level processing skills (inference, conjunction use, and comprehension monitoring). ELL poor comprehenders had significantly lower scores than ELL average and good comprehenders on vocabulary breadth, listening comprehension, and morphological awareness, whereas there were no significant differences between the average and good comprehender groups on these skills. Additionally, both ELL poor and average comprehenders had lower scores than ELL good comprehenders on all three higher-level skills. Finally, results showed that ELL poor comprehenders scored lower than EL1 poor comprehenders on vocabulary breadth, listening comprehension, and morphological awareness, but the two groups did not differ on higher-level skills. Theoretical and educational implications for the identification and instruction of ELL poor comprehenders are discussed.
本研究探讨了英语作为第二语言学习者(ELL)阅读理解困难的来源。将 ELL 阅读理解能力较差者的特点与其以英语为第一语言(EL1)的同龄人进行了比较。参与者包括 124 名以中文为母语的 ELL 学生和 79 名 EL1 学生。使用基于年龄、非言语推理、单词阅读准确性和单词阅读流畅性的回归技术,在每个语言群体中确定了三种理解者(较差、平均和较好)。然后,在口语技能(词汇广度、词汇深度和听力理解)、元语言技能(形态意识和句法意识)、工作记忆和高级处理技能(推理、连接词使用和理解监控)方面对这些群体进行了比较。ELL 阅读理解能力较差者在词汇广度、听力理解和形态意识方面的得分明显低于 ELL 阅读理解能力平均者和较好者,而在这些技能方面,平均者和较好者之间没有显著差异。此外,ELL 阅读理解能力较差者和平均者在所有三个高级技能方面的得分均低于 ELL 阅读理解能力较好者。最后,结果表明,ELL 阅读理解能力较差者在词汇广度、听力理解和形态意识方面的得分均低于 EL1 阅读理解能力较差者,但这两个群体在高级技能方面没有差异。讨论了对 ELL 阅读理解能力较差者的识别和指导的理论和教育意义。