Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚成年人的身体活动知识水平与身体活动行为有何关联?

How are different levels of knowledge about physical activity associated with physical activity behaviour in Australian adults?

机构信息

Physical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207003. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

People with knowledge of the benefits of physical activity tend to be more active; however, such knowledge is typically operationalized as a basic understanding that physical activity is 'good' for health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in how detailed a person's knowledge is about the benefits of physical activity. Participants (N = 615) completed an online survey to measure their current physical activity behaviour, as well as their level of knowledge of the benefits and risks of physical (in)activity. The majority of participants (99.6%) strongly agreed that physical activity is good for health, however on average, participants only identified 13.8 out of 22 diseases associated with physical inactivity and over half of participants (55.6%) could not identify how much physical activity is recommended for health benefits. Furthermore, 45% of the participants overestimated, 9% underestimated and 27% did not know the increased risk of disease resulting from inactivity as indicated by the Australian Department of Health. Participants were significantly more active when they correctly identified more diseases associated with physical inactivity and when they overestimated the risks associated with inactivity. Therefore, health promotion initiatives should increase knowledge of the types of diseases associated with inactivity. Low knowledge of physical activity guidelines suggest they should be promoted more, as this knowledge provides guidance on frequency, types and duration of physical activity needed for health.

摘要

具有体育活动益处知识的人往往更活跃;然而,这种知识通常被理解为体育活动对健康“有益”的基本认识。因此,本研究旨在调查人们对体育活动益处的了解程度是否存在差异。参与者(N=615)完成了一项在线调查,以衡量他们当前的体育活动行为以及他们对体育(不)活动的益处和风险的了解程度。大多数参与者(99.6%)强烈同意体育活动对健康有益,然而,平均而言,参与者仅能识别出与缺乏体力活动相关的 22 种疾病中的 13.8 种,超过一半的参与者(55.6%)无法确定为了获得健康益处需要进行多少体育活动。此外,45%的参与者高估了,9%的参与者低估了,27%的参与者不知道澳大利亚卫生部所指出的不活动导致的疾病风险增加。当参与者正确识别出更多与缺乏体力活动相关的疾病,并且高估了与缺乏体力活动相关的风险时,他们的活动就会更加活跃。因此,健康促进计划应该增加与缺乏体力活动相关的疾病类型的知识。体力活动指南知识水平较低表明,应该更多地推广这些指南,因为这些知识提供了关于健康所需的体力活动频率、类型和持续时间的指导。

相似文献

1
How are different levels of knowledge about physical activity associated with physical activity behaviour in Australian adults?
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207003. eCollection 2018.
3
Trends in prevalence of leisure time physical activity and inactivity: results from Australian National Health Surveys 1989 to 2011.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Dec;41(6):617-624. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12699. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Physical activity guidelines: is the message getting through to adults with rheumatic conditions?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Oct;53(10):1812-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu177. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: an Australian example.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 24;8:99. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-99.

引用本文的文献

2
Exercise Barriers Among Females With Type 2 Diabetes: Exploring Age-Related Differences.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Aug;51(4):404-414. doi: 10.1177/26350106251350613. Epub 2025 Jul 20.
3
Does Knowledge About Physical Activity Translate into More Active Populations?
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1393. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121393.
4
Physical literacy-based intervention for chronic disease management: a quasi-experimental study protocol.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 May 30;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01175-6.
5
Prevalence of knowledge on maternal physical activity among pregnant women: a protocol for a systematic review.
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2022 Nov 2;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44167-022-00006-0.
6
9
The Significance of Physical Activity Education: A Survey of Medical Students.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023 Aug 3;18(6):832-842. doi: 10.1177/15598276231187838. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The case for a smoker's license.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001342. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
2
Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
3
Awareness of Canada's Physical Activity Guide to Healthy Active Living in a large community sample.
Am J Health Promot. 2011 May-Jun;25(5):294-7. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090211-ARB-60.
5
Awareness of national physical activity recommendations for health promotion among US adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Oct;41(10):1849-55. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a52100.
7
The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity.
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb 15;161(4):389-98. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi054.
8
American adults' knowledge of exercise recommendations.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004 Sep;75(3):231-7. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2004.10609156.
10
Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.
Sports Med. 2001 Feb;31(2):91-100. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131020-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验