Suppr超能文献

结扎诱导的实验性种植体周围炎——一项系统评价

Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis-A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Reinedahl David, Chrcanovic Bruno, Albrektsson Tomas, Tengvall Pentti, Wennerberg Ann

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg 405 30, Sweden.

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö 205 06, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2018 Nov 28;7(12):492. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120492.

Abstract

This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, "dental floss" (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here.

摘要

本系统评价旨在分析不同的实验性种植体周围炎模型、其诱导边缘骨吸收(MBR)的潜力以及在这些模型中发生骨丢失时细菌的必要性。在PubMed/Medline、Web of Science和ScienceDirect上进行了电子检索。共分析了133项研究。大多数研究通过已形成生物膜的结扎线诱导种植体周围炎,有时结合特定细菌的接种,但从未在无菌环境中进行。大多数垂直MBR是由定期放置在旧结扎线上方的新结扎线导致的,其次是定期更换的结扎线和未更换的结扎线。棉结扎线产生的MBR最多,其次是钢、“牙线”(研究中未进一步明确)和丝线。不同动物类型和种植体表面之间的MBR量差异显著。所分析的结扎线研究均未旨在验证细菌对于诱导MBR是否必要。不能排除骨丢失可由模型的其他因素导致,例如对结扎线本身的免疫反应或反复插入结扎线造成的创伤。由于所有纳入试验均允许菌斑在结扎线上积聚,因此此处无法排除或评估由其他因素导致的骨吸收能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f6/6306937/9f0a39eae8cf/jcm-07-00492-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验