• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质β功率反映决策动态,揭示了错误后适应的多个方面。

Cortical beta power reflects decision dynamics and uncovers multiple facets of post-error adaptation.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany.

Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, D-39106, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 28;9(1):5038. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07456-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-07456-8
PMID:30487572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261941/
Abstract

Adapting to errors quickly is essential for survival. Reaction slowing after errors is commonly observed but whether this slowing is adaptive or maladaptive is unclear. Here, we analyse a large dataset from a flanker task using two complementary approaches: a multistage drift-diffusion model, and the lateralisation of EEG beta power as a time-resolved index of choice formation. Fitted model parameters and their independently measured neuronal proxies in beta power convergently show a complex interplay of multiple mechanisms initiated after mistakes. Suppression of distracting evidence, response threshold increase, and reduction of evidence accumulation cause slow and accurate post-error responses. This data provides evidence for both adaptive control and maladaptive orienting after errors yielding an adaptive net effect - a decreased likelihood to repeat mistakes. Generally, lateralised beta power provides a non-invasive readout of action selection for the study of speeded cognitive control processes.

摘要

快速适应错误对于生存至关重要。人们通常观察到错误后反应会变慢,但这种变慢是适应性的还是不良性的尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用两种互补的方法分析了来自侧翼任务的大型数据集:多阶段漂移扩散模型,以及 EEG β功率的侧化作为选择形成的时间分辨指标。拟合模型参数及其在β功率中的独立测量神经元代理都显示出在错误后启动的多种机制的复杂相互作用。抑制干扰证据、增加响应阈值和减少证据积累会导致错误后反应缓慢而准确。这些数据为错误后适应性控制和不良性定向提供了证据,从而产生了适应性的净效应——降低重复错误的可能性。一般来说,侧化β功率为加速认知控制过程的研究提供了一种非侵入性的动作选择读出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/353f07383db9/41467_2018_7456_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/40a1e4f6d71e/41467_2018_7456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/443857e21828/41467_2018_7456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/0d3a889e16a9/41467_2018_7456_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/baf45e054897/41467_2018_7456_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/0c6943ac0725/41467_2018_7456_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/8f672a97c743/41467_2018_7456_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/95f945af0499/41467_2018_7456_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/353f07383db9/41467_2018_7456_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/40a1e4f6d71e/41467_2018_7456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/443857e21828/41467_2018_7456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/0d3a889e16a9/41467_2018_7456_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/baf45e054897/41467_2018_7456_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/0c6943ac0725/41467_2018_7456_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/8f672a97c743/41467_2018_7456_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/95f945af0499/41467_2018_7456_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2887/6261941/353f07383db9/41467_2018_7456_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cortical beta power reflects decision dynamics and uncovers multiple facets of post-error adaptation.皮质β功率反映决策动态,揭示了错误后适应的多个方面。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 28;9(1):5038. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07456-8.
2
The power of frontal midline theta and post-error slowing to predict performance recovery: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms.额中线θ波和错误后减速的能力预测表现恢复:补偿机制的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Apr;55(4). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13010. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
Cortical β Power Reflects a Neural Implementation of Decision Boundary Collapse in Speeded Decisions.皮层β功率反映了在快速决策中决策边界崩溃的神经实现。
J Neurosci. 2024 Mar 27;44(13):e1713232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1713-23.2024.
4
Is attention enhanced following performance errors? Testing the adaptive control hypothesis.注意是否会在表现错误后增强?检验自适应控制假说。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Apr;55(4). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13022. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Alpha power is influenced by performance errors.阿尔法波功率受执行错误的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Mar;46(2):336-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00773.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
6
Effects of post-response arousal on cognitive control: Adaptive or maladaptive?反应后唤醒对认知控制的影响:适应性还是适应不良?
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e13988. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13988. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
7
Simultaneous EEG and pupillary evidence for post-error arousal during a speeded performance task.在一项快速绩效任务中,同时使用 EEG 和瞳孔记录来证明错误后觉醒。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Jan;53(2):543-555. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14947. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
8
The Pupillary Orienting Response Predicts Adaptive Behavioral Adjustment after Errors.瞳孔定向反应可预测错误后的适应性行为调整。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151763. eCollection 2016.
9
Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.CNV 幅度的逐次波动反映了对反应谨慎性的预期调整。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.063. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Neural signatures of adaptive post-error adjustments in visual search.视觉搜索中适应性错误后调整的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.059. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex.内侧和外侧前额叶皮质中主动和反应性认知控制的神经动力学
iScience. 2025 Aug 14;28(9):113375. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113375. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.
2
A thin line between conflict and reaction time effects on EEG and fMRI brain signals.冲突与反应时间对脑电图(EEG)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)脑信号影响之间的细微界限。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 May 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00161. eCollection 2024.
3
The temporal dynamics of metacognitive experiences track rational adaptations in task performance.

本文引用的文献

1
An adaptive orienting theory of error processing.一种自适应定向错误处理理论。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Mar;55(3). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13041. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
Comparing the error-related negativity across groups: The impact of error- and trial-number differences.比较不同组之间与错误相关的负波:错误和试验次数差异的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Jul;54(7):998-1009. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12863. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Neural signatures of adaptive post-error adjustments in visual search.视觉搜索中适应性错误后调整的神经特征。
元认知体验的时间动态追踪任务表现中的理性适应。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;3(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00282-x.
4
The impact of impulsivity and compulsivity on error processing in different motivational contexts.冲动性和强迫性在不同动机情境下对错误加工的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01281-5.
5
Expectation violations signal goals in novel human communication.期望违背在新颖的人际交流中标志着目标。
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 26;16(1):1989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57025-z.
6
Distractor-specific control adaptation in multidimensional environments.多维环境中特定干扰物的控制适应
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):534-553. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02088-z. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
7
A comparative analysis of face and object perception in 2D laboratory and virtual reality settings: insights from induced oscillatory responses.二维实验室和虚拟现实环境中面孔和物体感知的对比分析:诱导振荡反应的启示。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Dec;242(12):2765-2783. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06935-3. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
8
Cognitive Control.认知控制
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):167-195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022024-103901. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
9
Flanker task parameters are related to the strength of association between the ERN and anxiety: a meta-analysis.侧翼任务参数与错误相关负波(ERN)和焦虑之间的关联强度有关:一项荟萃分析。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 28:2024.08.27.609944. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.27.609944.
10
People are more error-prone after committing an error.人在犯错后更容易犯错。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 30;15(1):6422. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50547-y.
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.059. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
Error-Induced Blindness: Error Detection Leads to Impaired Sensory Processing and Lower Accuracy at Short Response-Stimulus Intervals.错误诱发失明:错误检测导致感觉处理受损以及在短反应-刺激间隔下准确性降低。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):2895-2903. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
5
On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.论运动抑制的全局性:意外事件及其对行为和认知的影响。
Neuron. 2017 Jan 18;93(2):259-280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013.
6
Motor cortex activity predicts response alternation during sensorimotor decisions.运动皮层活动预测感觉运动决策中的反应交替。
Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 7;7:13098. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13098.
7
Dissociated functional significance of decision-related activity in the primate dorsal stream.灵长类动物背侧视觉通路中与决策相关活动的分离功能意义。
Nature. 2016 Jul 14;535(7611):285-8. doi: 10.1038/nature18617. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
8
Surprise disrupts cognition via a fronto-basal ganglia suppressive mechanism.惊讶通过额底神经节抑制机制扰乱认知。
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 18;7:11195. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11195.
9
Gender Influences on Brain Responses to Errors and Post-Error Adjustments.性别对大脑错误反应及错误后调整的影响。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 14;6:24435. doi: 10.1038/srep24435.
10
Errors Disrupt Subsequent Early Attentional Processes.错误会干扰随后的早期注意力过程。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0151843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151843. eCollection 2016.