Deeb Haneen, Vrij Aldert, Burkhardt Jennifer, Leal Sharon, Mann Samantha
School of Psychology, Sport and Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(9):839. doi: 10.3390/bs14090839.
Research has shown that complications are more common in truth tellers' accounts than in lie tellers' accounts, but there is currently no experiment that has examined the accuracy of observers' veracity judgments when looking at complications. A total of 87 participants were asked to judge 10 transcripts (five truthful and five false) derived from a set of 59 transcripts generated in a previous experiment by Deeb et al. Approximately half of the participants were trained to detect complications (Trained), and the other half did not receive training (Untrained). Trained participants were more likely to look for complications, but they did not detect them accurately, and thus their veracity judgments did not improve beyond Untrained participants' judgments. We discuss that the training may have been too brief or not sensitive enough to enhance decision-making.
研究表明，在说真话者的陈述中并发症比说谎者的陈述中更常见，但目前尚无实验研究观察者在查看并发症时对真实性判断的准确性。总共87名参与者被要求判断10份笔录（5份真实的和5份虚假的），这些笔录来自迪布等人先前实验中生成的59份笔录。大约一半的参与者接受了检测并发症的培训（受过培训组），另一半没有接受培训（未受过培训组）。受过培训的参与者更有可能去寻找并发症，但他们并不能准确地检测到，因此他们对真实性的判断并没有比未受过培训的参与者有所提高。我们讨论认为，培训可能过于简短或不够敏感，不足以增强决策能力。
