a Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Hamburg , Hamburg , Germany.
b HITeC e.V , Hamburg , Germany.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Oct;48(9):738-760. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1528207. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
Drugs, cosmetics, preservatives, fragrances, pesticides, metals, and other chemicals can cause skin sensitization. The ability to predict the skin sensitization potential and potency of substances is therefore of enormous importance to a host of different industries, to customers' and workers' safety. Animal experiments have been the preferred testing method for most risk assessment and regulatory purposes but considerable efforts to replace them with non-animal models and in silico models are ongoing. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the computational approaches and models that have been developed for skin sensitization prediction over the last 10 years. The scope and limitations of rule-based approaches, read-across, linear and nonlinear (quantitative) structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR) modeling, hybrid or combined approaches, and models integrating computational methods with experimental results are discussed followed by examples of relevant models. Emphasis is placed on models that are accessible to the scientific community, and on model validation. A dedicated section reports on comparative performance assessments of various approaches and models. The review also provides a concise overview of relevant data sources on skin sensitization.
药品、化妆品、防腐剂、香料、农药、金属和其他化学物质会引起皮肤致敏。因此,对于许多不同的行业、客户和工人的安全来说,预测物质的皮肤致敏潜力和效力的能力非常重要。动物实验一直是大多数风险评估和监管目的的首选测试方法,但正在进行大量努力,以用非动物模型和计算模型来替代它们。本文综述了过去 10 年来为皮肤致敏预测而开发的计算方法和模型。讨论了基于规则的方法、读通、线性和非线性(定量)构效关系 ((Q)SAR) 建模、混合或组合方法以及将计算方法与实验结果相结合的模型的范围和局限性,并举例说明了相关模型。重点介绍了科学界可访问的模型和模型验证。专门的一节报告了各种方法和模型的比较性能评估。该综述还简要概述了皮肤致敏相关的数据源。