• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持信心判断和错误检测的动态证据来源。

Dynamic sources of evidence supporting confidence judgments and error detection.

作者信息

Charles Lucie, Yeung Nick

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):39-52. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000583. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000583
PMID:30489097
Abstract

Our decisions are accompanied by a subjective sense of confidence about whether the choices we have made are correct or erroneous. We investigate the information on which these confidence judgments are based, and how they relate to the decision itself, by studying how fluctuations in perceptual information influence decisions and second-order metacognitive evaluations of confidence and accuracy. Human participants judged which of two dynamically changing stimuli contained more dots, under instructions emphasizing either speed or accuracy. Crucially, stimuli remained visible for one second after the decision, before participants rated their confidence in their choice. We found that confidence and error detection depended on the balance of stimulus evidence accumulated in the periods both preceding and following the initial decision, regardless of whether instructions emphasized speed or accuracy. These findings suggest a shared computational basis for error detection and confidence judgments, with implications for current models of metacognitive evaluation of decision processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们的决策伴随着一种主观的自信感,关乎我们所做的选择是正确还是错误。我们通过研究感知信息的波动如何影响决策以及对信心和准确性的二阶元认知评估,来探究这些信心判断所基于的信息,以及它们与决策本身的关系。人类参与者在强调速度或准确性的指示下,判断两个动态变化的刺激中哪一个包含更多的点。至关重要的是,在参与者对自己的选择进行信心评级之前,刺激在决策后仍会显示一秒钟。我们发现,信心和错误检测取决于初始决策之前和之后积累的刺激证据的平衡,无论指示强调的是速度还是准确性。这些发现表明错误检测和信心判断有一个共同的计算基础,这对当前决策过程的元认知评估模型具有启示意义。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Dynamic sources of evidence supporting confidence judgments and error detection.支持信心判断和错误检测的动态证据来源。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):39-52. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000583. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.在记忆任务中,反应会提高信心判断的准确性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):712-723. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000608. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Signatures of a Statistical Computation in the Human Sense of Confidence.人类置信感中统计计算的特征
Neuron. 2016 May 4;90(3):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.025.
5
Metacognitive improvement: Disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds.元认知提升:从实验混淆中区分适应性训练。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Sep;151(9):2083-2091. doi: 10.1037/xge0001185. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.证据可靠性对决策信心的敏感性和偏差的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Aug;43(8):1520-1531. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000404. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Uncertainty information that is irrelevant for report impacts confidence judgments.与报告无关的不确定性信息会影响信心判断。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1981-1994. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000584.
8
Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm.双重任务范式下知觉元认知的恢复力
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Dec;27(6):1259-1268. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01779-8.
9
Confidence Predictions Affect Performance Confidence and Neural Preparation in Perceptual Decision Making.置信度预测会影响感知决策中的表现信心和神经准备。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 11;9(1):4031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40681-9.
10
Confidence in masked orientation judgments is informed by both evidence and visibility.对遮挡方向判断的信心受到证据和可见性两者的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jan;80(1):134-154. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1431-5.

引用本文的文献

1
An Automatic Domain-General Error Signal Is Shared across Tasks and Predicts Confidence in Different Sensory Modalities.一种自动的通用领域错误信号在不同任务间共享,并预测对不同感觉模态的信心。
eNeuro. 2025 Jun 6;12(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0124-25.2025. Print 2025 Jun.
2
The confidence-noise confidence-boost (CNCB) model of confidence rating data.信心评级数据的信心-噪声-信心增强(CNCB)模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 21;21(4):e1012451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012451. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Optimal metacognitive decision strategies in signal detection theory.
信号检测理论中的最优元认知决策策略。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1041-1069. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02510-7. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Bayesian confidence in optimal decisions.贝叶斯置信度在最优决策中的应用。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Oct;131(5):1114-1160. doi: 10.1037/rev0000472. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks.波动刺激任务中漂移扩散观察者的贝叶斯置信度表达式。
J Math Psychol. 2023 Dec;117:102815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102815.
6
Attractor dynamics reflect decision confidence in macaque prefrontal cortex.吸引子动力学反映猕猴前额叶皮层的决策信心。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):1970-1980. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01445-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
Prior information differentially affects discrimination decisions and subjective confidence reports.先前信息会对辨别决策和主观置信报告产生差异影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 6;14(1):5473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41112-0.
8
The relationship between response dynamics and the formation of confidence varies across the lifespan.反应动态与信心形成之间的关系在整个生命周期中各不相同。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Dec 15;14:969074. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.969074. eCollection 2022.
9
An initial 'snapshot' of sensory information biases the likelihood and speed of subsequent changes of mind.初始的“感知信息快照”会影响后续思维改变的可能性和速度。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 13;18(1):e1009738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009738. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making.填补空白:认知控制作为理解基于价值的决策机制的关键视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Mar;134:104483. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 10.