Lin Hong-Cheng, He Qiu-Lan, Shao Wan-Jin, Chen Xin-Lin, Peng Hui, Xie Shang-Kui, Wang Xiao-Xue, Ren Dong-Lin
Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):223-233. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001261.
Long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy are not known.
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy with circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
This was a parallel group, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial.
The study was conducted at a single academic center.
Patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids between August 2011 and November 2013 were included.
Three hundred patients were randomly assigned to undergo either partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 1, n = 150) or circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 2, n = 150).
The primary outcome was the rate of recurrent prolapse at a median follow-up period of 5 years with a predefined noninferiority margin of 3.75%. Secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of postoperative pain, fecal urgency, anal continence, and the frequency of specific complications, including anorectal stenosis and rectovaginal fistula.
The visual analog scores in group 1 were less than those in group 2 (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in group 1 experienced postoperative urgency compared with those in group 2 (p = 0.001). Anal continence significantly worsened after both procedures, but the difference between preoperative and postoperative continence scores was higher for group 2 than for group 1. Postoperative rectal stenosis did not develop in patients in group 1, although it occurred in 8 patients (5%) in group 2 (p = 0.004). The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate between group 1 (9% (95% CI, 4%-13%)) and group 2 (12% (95% CI, 7%-17%)) did not differ significantly (p = 0.137), and the difference was within the noninferiority margin (absolute difference, -3.33% (95% CI, -10.00% to 3.55%)).
The study was limited because it was a single-center trial.
Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy is noninferior to circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy for patients with grade III to IV hemorrhoids at a median follow-up period of 5 years. However, partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy was associated with reduced postoperative pain and urgency, better postoperative anal continence, and minimal risk of rectal stenosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A790.Trial registration (chictr.org) identifier is chiCTR-trc-11001506.
部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的长期疗效尚不清楚。
本研究旨在比较部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与环形吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的长期临床疗效和安全性。
这是一项平行组、随机、非劣效性临床试验。
该研究在一个学术中心进行。
纳入2011年8月至2013年11月间患有III/IV度痔疮的患者。
300例患者被随机分配接受部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(第1组,n = 150)或环形吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(第2组,n = 150)。
主要结局是在中位随访期5年时复发脱垂率,预设非劣效界值为3.75%。次要结局包括术后疼痛、便急、肛门节制的发生率和严重程度,以及特定并发症的发生频率,包括肛门直肠狭窄和直肠阴道瘘。
第1组的视觉模拟评分低于第2组(p < 0.001)。与第2组相比,第1组术后出现便急的患者更少(p = 0.001)。两种手术术后肛门节制均明显恶化,但第2组术前和术后节制评分的差异高于第1组。第1组患者未发生术后直肠狭窄,而第2组有8例患者(5%)发生(p = 0.004)。第1组(9%(95%CI,4%-13%))和第2组(12%(95%CI,7%-17%))的5年累积复发率无显著差异(p = 0.137),且差异在非劣效界值范围内(绝对差异,-3.33%(9%CI,-10.00%至3.55%))。
该研究存在局限性,因为它是一项单中心试验。
对于III至IV度痔疮患者,在中位随访期5年时,部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术不劣于环形吻合器痔上黏膜环切术。然而,部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术术后疼痛和便急减轻,术后肛门节制更好,直肠狭窄风险最小。见视频摘要:http://links.lww.com/DCR/A790。试验注册(chictr.org)标识符为chiCTR-trc-11001506。