• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良组织选择吻合器治疗内痔脱垂的疗效观察

Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

作者信息

Yuan Chenchen, Zhou Chongjun, Xue Rong, Jin Xiaofeng, Jin Chun, Zheng Chenguo

机构信息

The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Department of Graduate Education Management Division, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Mar 3;9:838742. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.838742. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.838742
PMID:35310446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8927070/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tissue selection therapy staplers (TSTs) are widely used to treat prolapsing hemorrhoids; however, some disadvantages exist. We describe a modified technique for the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids, with the aim of minimizing the risk of anal stenosis and anal incontinence and reducing the impact of postoperative complications from the stapling technique. We applied a modified TST procedure, and the preliminary data were used to test the efficacy and safety of this new technique.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent modified TST for prolapsing hemorrhoids at our department between January 2018 and January 2020. All patients received a modified TST. Most prolapsing hemorrhoids were not segmentally resected and were instead selectively removed. The demographics, preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, therapeutic effects, and patient satisfaction were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were included in the study; 53 were men and 53 women (mean age, 49.24 years). The mean operative time was 55.01 min, and the mean hospital stay was 7.82 days. After surgery, three patients experienced bleeding (2.83%), 2 patients experienced anal discharge (1.89%), 2 patients experienced tenesmus (1.89%), and 5 patients experienced anal tags (4.72%). Anal incontinence, persistent post stapler pain, rectovaginal fistula and anal stenosis did not occur. Two patients developed recurrent symptomatic hemorrhoids (1.89%). The total effective rate of the surgery and the total satisfaction rate of the patients was 97.17%.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified tissue selection therapy stapler technique was a satisfactory and economical treatment for prolapsing hemorrhoids at a follow-up period of 1 year. The modified TST was associated with reduced anal stenosis and anal incontinence, less persistent post stapler pain and a minimal risk of rectovaginal fistula.

摘要

目的

组织选择性痔吻合器(TST)被广泛用于治疗内痔脱垂;然而,该方法存在一些缺点。我们描述了一种治疗内痔脱垂的改良技术,旨在将肛门狭窄和肛门失禁的风险降至最低,并减少吻合器技术术后并发症的影响。我们应用了改良的TST手术,并使用初步数据来测试这项新技术的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们对2018年1月至2020年1月在我科接受改良TST治疗内痔脱垂的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。所有患者均接受改良TST治疗。大多数内痔脱垂未进行分段切除,而是进行选择性切除。收集并分析患者的人口统计学资料、术前特征、术后并发症、治疗效果及患者满意度。

结果

本研究共纳入106例患者,其中男性53例,女性53例(平均年龄49.24岁)。平均手术时间为55.01分钟,平均住院时间为7.82天。术后,3例患者出现出血(2.83%),2例患者出现肛门溢液(1.89%),2例患者出现里急后重(1.89%),5例患者出现皮赘(4.72%)。未发生肛门失禁、吻合器术后持续疼痛、直肠阴道瘘和肛门狭窄。2例患者出现复发性症状性痔(1.89%)。手术总有效率和患者总满意率为97.17%。

结论

改良组织选择性痔吻合器技术在1年的随访期内是一种令人满意且经济的内痔脱垂治疗方法。改良TST可减少肛门狭窄和肛门失禁,减轻吻合器术后持续疼痛,降低直肠阴道瘘的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/110fd12e3fe6/fsurg-09-838742-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/4ae4eb0522e6/fsurg-09-838742-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/118111c88a3b/fsurg-09-838742-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/bc30b14aaf7c/fsurg-09-838742-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/110fd12e3fe6/fsurg-09-838742-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/4ae4eb0522e6/fsurg-09-838742-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/118111c88a3b/fsurg-09-838742-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/bc30b14aaf7c/fsurg-09-838742-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4c8/8927070/110fd12e3fe6/fsurg-09-838742-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.改良组织选择吻合器治疗内痔脱垂的疗效观察
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 3;9:838742. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.838742. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy.组织挑痔疗法治疗内痔脱出的临床观察
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 28;21(8):2490-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2490.
3
Early Experience With a Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treating Patients With Grades III-IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ度脱垂性痔的早期经验
Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;33(1):28-34. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.28. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Indications, Feasibility, and Safety of TST STARR Plus Stapler for Degree III Hemorrhoids: A Retrospective Study of 125 Hemorrhoids Patients.TST STARR Plus吻合器治疗Ⅲ度痔的适应症、可行性及安全性:125例痔患者的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 13;9:860150. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.860150. eCollection 2022.
5
[Efficacy comparison of tissue selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of severe hemorrhoids].组织选择吻合器与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度痔的疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;16(7):645-7.
6
The efficiency and safety of modified tissue-selecting therapy stapler combined with complete anal canal epithelial preservation operation in circumferential mixed hemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial.改良组织选择性切除术吻合器联合完整肛垫保留术治疗环状混合痔的疗效及安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 24;408(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03081-2.
7
Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.吻合器痔上黏膜部分切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗Ⅲ至Ⅳ度脱垂性内痔的随机非劣效性试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):223-233. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001261.
8
Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids in HIV-Infected Patients with Tissue-Selecting Technique.采用组织选择技术治疗HIV感染患者的脱垂性痔。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:1970985. doi: 10.1155/2017/1970985. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
9
Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study.部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ度脱垂痔的前瞻性对照研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;16(5):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0815-8. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
10
Tissue-selecting-technique mega-window stapler combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation in prolapsed hemorrhoids.组织选择性技术超大窗口吻合器联合肛管上皮保留术治疗脱垂性痔
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.149. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilisation of Deep Neural Networks for Estimation of Cajal Cells in the Anal Canal Wall of Patients with Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease Treated by LigaSure Surgery.利用深度神经网络估计接受LigaSure手术治疗的晚期痔病患者肛管壁中的Cajal细胞。
Cells. 2025 Apr 5;14(7):550. doi: 10.3390/cells14070550.
2
The comparison of doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and the tissue selecting technique for patients with grade III/IV haemorrhoids: a retrospective cohort study.多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术与组织选择技术治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ度痔的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02202-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of Surgical Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: An Historical Overview.痔病外科治疗的演变:历史概述
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 30;8:727059. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.727059. eCollection 2021.
2
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: "Mucosectomy or Not Only Mucosectomy, This Is the Problem".吻合器痔上黏膜环切术:“是否行黏膜切除,这是个问题” 。
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 12;8:655257. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.655257. eCollection 2021.
3
Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction.痔上黏膜环切术改良术式:降低复发率,提高满意度。
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jan 6;9(1):36-46. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.36.
4
Tissue selecting technique mega-window stapler combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation for the treatment of severe prolapsed hemorrhoids: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.组织选择技术超大窗口吻合器联合肛管上皮保留术治疗重度脱垂性痔:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23122. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023122.
5
Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.排便失禁症状在无、一或二种产科肛门括约肌损伤 20 年后。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):276.e1-276.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.051. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Gluteal-fold flap repair of rectovaginal fistula caused by aluminum potassium sulfate hydrate-tannic acid injection for internal hemorrhoids: a case report.水合硫酸铝钾-鞣酸注射治疗内痔致直肠阴道瘘的臀沟皮瓣修复术:病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2020 Jul 8;6(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s40792-020-00925-7.
7
Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)共识声明:痔病的处理和治疗。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;24(2):145-164. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02149-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and tissue-selecting therapy stapler in the treatment of grade III and IV internal hemorrhoids(Meta-analysis).网状荟萃分析比较脱垂和痔的随机对照试验,比较痔环切术和选择性痔吻合术治疗 III 度和 IV 度内痔的疗效(荟萃分析)。
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.027. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
9
Segmental resection combined with anoplasty for the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids.分段切除联合肛门成形术治疗环状混合痔。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(5):e8102. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20198102. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
[Effect of electroacupuncture preconditioning with different frequencies on anal pain after milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy].[不同频率电针预处理对Milligan-Morgan痔切除术后肛门疼痛的影响]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2019 May 12;39(5):477-81. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.05.005.