Kim Tae Gyu, Lee Chul Seung, Lee Dong Geun, Chung Choon Sik, Kim Seung Han, Yu Sang Hwa, Lee Jeong Eun, Lee Gwan Cheol, Kang Dong Woo, Kim Jeong Sub, Jeong Gyu Young
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Apr;41(2):145-153. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH.
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups.
The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867).
The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH.
与传统痔切除术(CH)相比,部分吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PSH)的长期疗效尚未完全明确。本研究旨在介绍一种改良的PSH(mPSH),并比较其与CH的临床疗效和安全性。
进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。本研究在一家医院开展,涉及6名结直肠外科医生。2019年7月至2020年9月期间,共纳入110例患者。患者被随机分配接受mPSH组(n = 55)或CH组(n = 55)。主要结局是使用视觉模拟量表评分比较两组术后平均疼痛和术后峰值疼痛。
mPSH组所需的镇痛时间比CH组短,尽管差异无统计学意义(P = 0.096)。然而,mPSH组在缓泻剂使用时间(P < 0.010)、恢复工作时间(P < 0.010)、满意度评分(P < 0.010)和Vaizey评分(P = 0.014)方面明显更好。术后15天内,mPSH组的术后平均疼痛评分和峰值疼痛评分明显更低(P < 0.001)。两组的总体并发症发生率均为9.1%,组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.867)。
与CH组相比,mPSH组术后症状改善更好、疼痛评分更低、患者早期满意度更高。因此,这种手术技术似乎是CH的一种安全有效的替代方法。