Neal D. Goldstein is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA. Joanna S. Suder is with the Civil Division, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington. Jonathan Purtle is with the Department of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health.
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):102-107. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304765. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
To examine trends and characteristics of proposed and enacted state legislation that would directly affect states' immunization exemption laws. We performed content analysis of proposed bills in state legislatures from 2011 to 2017. We classified bills as provaccination or antivaccination. State legislators proposed 175 bills, with the volume increasing over time: 92 (53%) bills expanded access to exemptions, and 83 (47%) limited the ability to exempt. Of the 13 bills signed into law, 12 (92%) limited the ability to exempt. Bills that expanded access to exemptions were more likely to come from Republican legislators and Northeastern and Southern states. Although most proposed legislation would have expanded access to exemptions, bills that limited exemptions were more likely to be enacted into law. Legal barriers to exempt one's children from vaccination persist despite vaccine hesitancy, which is encouraging for public health. Most vaccine exemption laws introduced in state legislatures would pose threats to the public's health. There is a need for constituents to engage their elected legislators and advocate provaccination policies.
为了研究可能直接影响各州免疫豁免法的州立立法提案和已通过立法的趋势和特征。我们对 2011 年至 2017 年州立法机构中的提案进行了内容分析。我们将法案分为赞成疫苗和反疫苗两类。州立法者共提出了 175 项法案,数量随着时间的推移而增加:92 项(53%)法案扩大了豁免权,83 项(47%)法案限制了豁免权。在已签署成为法律的 13 项法案中,有 12 项(92%)限制了豁免权。扩大豁免权的法案更可能来自共和党立法者和东北部和南部各州。尽管大多数提议的立法将扩大豁免权,但限制豁免权的法案更有可能被制定为法律。尽管疫苗犹豫,但仍有法律障碍使儿童免于接种疫苗,这对公共卫生是令人鼓舞的。州立法机构中提出的大多数疫苗豁免法将对公众健康构成威胁。选民需要让他们选出的立法者参与进来,并倡导赞成疫苗的政策。