Grant Peter E, Pampaka Maria, Payne Katherine, Clarke Angus, McAllister Marion
Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Departments of Social Statistics (School of Social Science) and Education (School of Environment Education and Development), The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):324-334. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
The Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a 24-item patient reported outcome measure for use in evaluations of genetic counselling and testing services. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of GCOS-24. The study comprised three phases. Phase I: Cognitive interviews were used to explore interpretability of GCOS-24 items and which GCOS-24 items were most valued by the target population. Phase II: The Graded Response Model was used to analyse an existing set of GCOS-24 responses (n = 395) to examine item discrimination. Phase III: Item Selection. Three principles guided the approach to item selection (i) Items with poor discriminative properties were not selected; (ii) To avoid redundancy, items capturing a similar outcome were not selected together; item information curves and cognitive interview findings were used to establish superior items. (iii) Rasch analysis was then used to determine the optimal scale. In Phase I, ten cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals affected by or at risk for a genetic condition, recruited from patient support groups. Analysis of interview transcripts identified twelve GCOS-24 items which were highly valued by participants. In Phase II, Graded Response Model item characteristic curves and item information curves were produced. In Phase III, findings from Phases I and II were used to select ten highly-valued items that perform well. Finally, items were iteratively removed and permutated to establish optimal fit statistics under the Rasch model. A six-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert Scale was produced (The Genomics Outcome Scale (GOS)). Correlation between GCOS-24 and GOS scores is high (r = 0.838 at 99% confidence), suggesting that GOS maintains the ability of GCOS-24 to capture empowerment, whilst providing a less burdensome scale for respondents. This study represents the first step in developing a preference-based measure which could be used in the evaluation of technologies and services used in genomic medicine.
遗传咨询结果量表(GCOS - 24)是一个包含24个条目的患者报告结局指标,用于评估遗传咨询和检测服务。本研究的目的是开发GCOS - 24的简版。该研究包括三个阶段。第一阶段:采用认知访谈来探究GCOS - 24条目的可解释性以及目标人群最重视哪些GCOS - 24条目。第二阶段:使用等级反应模型分析现有的一组GCOS - 24 responses(n = 395),以检验条目区分度。第三阶段:条目选择。有三条原则指导条目选择方法:(i)不选择区分度差的条目;(ii)为避免冗余,不一起选择捕捉相似结局的条目;利用条目信息曲线和认知访谈结果来确定更优条目。(iii)然后使用拉施分析来确定最佳量表。在第一阶段,对从患者支持小组招募的受遗传疾病影响或有遗传疾病风险的个体进行了十次认知访谈。对访谈记录的分析确定了12个GCOS - 24条目,这些条目受到参与者的高度重视。在第二阶段,生成了等级反应模型的条目特征曲线和条目信息曲线。在第三阶段,利用第一阶段和第二阶段的结果选择了十个表现良好且受到高度重视的条目。最后,反复删除和排列条目,以建立拉施模型下的最佳拟合统计量。生成了一个包含五点李克特量表的六项问卷(基因组学结果量表(GOS))。GCOS - 24和GOS得分之间的相关性很高(在99%置信度下r = 0.838),这表明GOS保持了GCOS - 24捕捉赋权的能力,同时为受访者提供了一个负担较小的量表。本研究是开发一种基于偏好的指标的第一步,该指标可用于评估基因组医学中使用的技术和服务。