Castillo Jose M, Wolgemuth Jennifer R, Ginns Diana S, Latimer Joseph, Scheel Nicholas, McKenna Meaghan, March Amanda L, Moulton Sara, Wang Joy, Thoman Sarah, Jenkins Andrew, Henson Kelli, Ferron John M
Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e024057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024057.
A multitiered system of supports (MTSS) represents a widely adopted public health approach to education in the USA. Researchers agree professional learning is critical for educators to implement the critical components of MTSS; however, professional learning approaches vary in their designs and targeted outcomes. While researchers increasingly focus their inquiries on professional learning for MTSS, no systematic research review exists.
The primary objectives for this mixed-methods review are to (1) understand how professional learning focused on MTSS has been operationalised (2) determine the impact of professional learning on educator (eg, knowledge) and implementation (eg, data-based decision-making processes) outcomes and (3) understand the contextual variables that influence professional learning in the USA. We aim to determine which elements of professional learning improve educators' capacity to implement MTSS.
We will include studies that use quantitative and qualitative methods. PsycInfo, PubMed, CIHAHL and ERIC will be the primary research databases used to search for studies published from January 1997 to May 2018. We also will search the US Institute for Educational Sciences and Office of Special Education Programs websites, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Science Watch and MSN. Finally, we will search the proceedings of relevant conferences, examine the reference lists of studies that pass full screening and contact authors for additional work. Data extraction will include participant demographics, intervention details, study design, outcomes, analyses and key findings. We will conduct a quality assessment and analyse the data using effect size and thematic analyses.
Institutional review board or ethics approval is not needed for this review of already published works. We will disseminate the findings through presentations at state, national and international conferences; presentations to stakeholders and agencies; publication in peer-reviewed journals; and posts to organisational and agency websites.
多层次支持系统(MTSS)是美国广泛采用的一种公共卫生教育方法。研究人员一致认为,专业学习对于教育工作者实施MTSS的关键组成部分至关重要;然而,专业学习方法在设计和目标成果方面各不相同。虽然研究人员越来越多地将研究重点放在MTSS的专业学习上,但尚无系统的研究综述。
本混合方法综述的主要目的是:(1)了解专注于MTSS的专业学习是如何实施的;(2)确定专业学习对教育工作者(如知识)和实施(如基于数据的决策过程)成果的影响;(3)了解影响美国专业学习的背景变量。我们旨在确定专业学习的哪些要素能提高教育工作者实施MTSS的能力。
我们将纳入使用定量和定性方法的研究。PsycInfo、PubMed、CIHAHL和ERIC将是用于搜索1997年1月至2018年5月发表的研究的主要研究数据库。我们还将搜索美国教育科学研究所和特殊教育项目办公室的网站、ProQuest、谷歌学术、科学观察和MSN。最后,我们将搜索相关会议的论文集,检查通过全面筛选的研究的参考文献列表,并联系作者获取更多作品。数据提取将包括参与者的人口统计学信息、干预细节、研究设计、结果、分析和主要发现。我们将进行质量评估,并使用效应量和主题分析来分析数据。
本次对已发表作品的综述无需机构审查委员会或伦理批准。我们将通过在州、国家和国际会议上的报告;向利益相关者和机构的报告;在同行评审期刊上发表;以及在组织和机构网站上发布来传播研究结果。