• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[快速痴呆评定系统在临床实践中的可行性:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究的结果]

[The feasibility of using Quick Dementia Rating System in clinical practice: results of a multi-center prospective validation study].

作者信息

Levin O S, Vasenina E E, Sonin A G, Tayupova G N, Zatsepina O E, Ostapenko T N

机构信息

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia.

Project MEMINI.

出版信息

Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(10):40-47. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201811811140.

DOI:10.17116/jnevro201811811140
PMID:30499495
Abstract

AIM

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS), a 10-item questionnaire for the assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and functional impairments, in the Russian population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors examined 2357 patients,1479 female (63%) and 878 male (37%), with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Their average age was 73,1±9,7. All patients were assessed using QDRS and MMSE on baseline visits and reassessed after 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of QDRS were 79,2% and 81,2%, respectively, at cut-interval of more than 7 points. There was a strong inverse correlation between QDRS and MMSE indicators (r=-0,740). QDRS was the most sensitive for the detection of severe dementia (sensitivity of 78,2% and specificity of 85,2%), while for mild and moderate dementia the sensitivity was high (79,4% and 81,6%) and specificity was low (56,6% and 61,9%, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of separate subtests were variable.

CONCLUSION

The QDRS sensitivity and specificity allow recommending it for clinical practice. The questionnaire is the most sensitive to detect more severe cognitive impairment.

摘要

目的

确定快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)在俄罗斯人群中的敏感性和特异性。QDRS是一份包含10个条目的问卷,用于评估认知、行为和功能障碍。

材料与方法

作者对2357例主观认知障碍(SCI)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆患者进行了检查,其中女性1479例(63%),男性878例(37%)。他们的平均年龄为73.1±9.7岁。所有患者在基线访视时使用QDRS和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)进行评估,并在1、3和6个月后重新评估。

结果

在截断值大于7分的情况下,QDRS的敏感性和特异性分别为79.2%和81.2%。QDRS与MMSE指标之间存在很强的负相关(r=-0.740)。QDRS对重度痴呆的检测最为敏感(敏感性为78.2%,特异性为85.2%),而对轻度和中度痴呆的敏感性较高(分别为79.4%和81.6%),但特异性较低(分别为56.6%和61.9%)。各个子测试的敏感性和特异性各不相同。

结论

QDRS的敏感性和特异性使其适用于临床实践。该问卷对检测更严重的认知障碍最为敏感。

相似文献

1
[The feasibility of using Quick Dementia Rating System in clinical practice: results of a multi-center prospective validation study].[快速痴呆评定系统在临床实践中的可行性:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究的结果]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(10):40-47. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201811811140.
2
Validation of the Informant Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) among Older Adults in Singapore.验证信息者快速痴呆评定量表(QDRS)在新加坡老年人中的适用性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(4):1323-1330. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220520.
3
Using a patient-reported outcome to improve detection of cognitive impairment and dementia: The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).使用患者报告的结果来提高认知障碍和痴呆的检测:快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)患者版。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240422. eCollection 2020.
4
Validation of the Korean Quick Dementia Rating System (K-QDRS).验证韩国快速痴呆评定系统(K-QDRS)。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(4):1645-1656. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210584.
5
The Number Symbol Coding Task: A brief measure of executive function to detect dementia and cognitive impairment.数字符号编码任务:一种用于检测痴呆和认知障碍的简短执行功能测量工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242233. eCollection 2020.
6
A pragmatic tool to screen for pre-transplant cognitive impairment among potential candidates for liver transplant.用于筛选肝移植潜在候选人移植前认知障碍的实用工具。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jan;38(1):e15232. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15232.
7
Staging of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: validity of Quick Dementia Rating System.帕金森病认知障碍的分期:快速痴呆评定量表的有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):44-51. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1755728. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Change in the Quick Dementia Rating System Across Time in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Impairment.认知障碍老年人与无认知障碍老年人快速痴呆评定量表随时间的变化。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(2):449-457. doi: 10.3233/JAD-221252.
9
Comparing the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination When Screening People for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Chinese Population.在中国人群中筛查轻度认知障碍和痴呆症时,比较蒙特利尔认知评估量表和简易精神状态检查表的敏感性、特异性及预测值。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016 Aug;30(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Comparison of "MCI Specific" Screening Instruments.轻度认知障碍的筛查:“MCI 特异性”筛查工具的比较
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(2):619-29. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150881.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).简易痴呆评定系统中文版(QDRS)的信效度分析
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06112-3.