• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using a patient-reported outcome to improve detection of cognitive impairment and dementia: The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).使用患者报告的结果来提高认知障碍和痴呆的检测:快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)患者版。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240422. eCollection 2020.
2
The Number Symbol Coding Task: A brief measure of executive function to detect dementia and cognitive impairment.数字符号编码任务:一种用于检测痴呆和认知障碍的简短执行功能测量工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242233. eCollection 2020.
3
THE QUICK DEMENTIA RATING SYSTEM (QDRS): A RAPID DEMENTIA STAGING TOOL.快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS):一种快速痴呆分期工具。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Jun 1;1(2):249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.03.003.
4
Validation of the Korean Quick Dementia Rating System (K-QDRS).验证韩国快速痴呆评定系统(K-QDRS)。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(4):1645-1656. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210584.
5
Validation of the Informant Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) among Older Adults in Singapore.验证信息者快速痴呆评定量表(QDRS)在新加坡老年人中的适用性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(4):1323-1330. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220520.
6
The Quick Physical Activity Rating (QPAR) scale: A brief assessment of physical activity in older adults with and without cognitive impairment.快速体力活动评估(QPAR)量表:对认知障碍和非认知障碍老年人体力活动的简要评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241641. eCollection 2020.
7
Staging of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: validity of Quick Dementia Rating System.帕金森病认知障碍的分期:快速痴呆评定量表的有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):44-51. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1755728. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Change in the Quick Dementia Rating System Across Time in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Impairment.认知障碍老年人与无认知障碍老年人快速痴呆评定量表随时间的变化。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(2):449-457. doi: 10.3233/JAD-221252.
9
[The feasibility of using Quick Dementia Rating System in clinical practice: results of a multi-center prospective validation study].[快速痴呆评定系统在临床实践中的可行性:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究的结果]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(10):40-47. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201811811140.
10
Use of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) as an Initial Screening Measure in a Longitudinal Cohort at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.在患阿尔茨海默病风险的纵向队列中,将快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)用作初始筛查手段。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2017;1(1):9-13. doi: 10.3233/ADR-170004. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Preclinical dementia rating scores are associated with plasma phosphorylated tau-217.临床前痴呆评定分数与血浆磷酸化tau-217相关。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Sep 7;17(3):e70179. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70179. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).简易痴呆评定系统中文版(QDRS)的信效度分析
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06112-3.
3
The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A new instrument to characterize subjective cognitive decline, and detect anosognosia in mild cognitive impairment.健康大脑9(HB9):一种用于表征主观认知衰退并检测轻度认知障碍中疾病感缺失的新工具。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0322351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322351. eCollection 2025.
4
The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment.健康大脑9(HB9):一种用于表征主观认知衰退并检测轻度认知障碍中疾病感缺失的新工具。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 23:2025.03.23.25324480. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.23.25324480.
5
The Dementia Literacy Assessment (DeLA): A novel measure of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders health literacy in diverse populations.痴呆症素养评估(DeLA):一种针对不同人群的阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病健康素养的新型测量方法。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Feb 19;11(1):e70054. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70054. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
6
Performance of study partner reports in a non-demented at-risk sample.研究伙伴报告在非痴呆高危样本中的表现。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14470. doi: 10.1002/alz.14470. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
7
Generating real-world evidence in Alzheimer's disease: Considerations for establishing a core dataset.在阿尔茨海默病中生成真实世界证据:建立核心数据集的考虑因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jun;20(6):4331-4341. doi: 10.1002/alz.13785. Epub 2024 May 6.
8
Hierarchical Two-Stage Cost-Sensitive Clinical Decision Support System for Screening Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.用于筛查前驱期阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆的分层两阶段成本敏感型临床决策支持系统。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(2):895-909. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220891.
9
The Brain Health Platform: Combining Resilience, Vulnerability, and Performance to Assess Brain Health and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders.大脑健康平台:结合韧性、脆弱性和表现来评估大脑健康以及阿尔茨海默病和相关疾病的风险。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90(4):1817-1830. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220927.
10
The Resilience Index: A Quantifiable Measure of Brain Health and Risk of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.韧性指数:大脑健康和认知障碍及痴呆风险的可量化指标。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84(4):1729-1746. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215077.

本文引用的文献

1
What older adults do with the results of dementia screening programs.老年人如何对待痴呆筛查项目的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235534. eCollection 2020.
2
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach.选择患者报告的结局指标以促进初级保健绩效测量:混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2687-2697. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05811-4. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
The Use of Measurement Systems to Support Patient Self-Management of Long-Term Conditions: An Overview of Opportunities and Challenges.利用测量系统支持慢性病患者的自我管理:机遇与挑战概述
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Dec 16;10:385-394. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S178488. eCollection 2019.
4
Risks and Benefits of Screening for Dementia in Primary Care: The Indiana University Cognitive Health Outcomes Investigation of the Comparative Effectiveness of Dementia Screening (IU CHOICE)Trial.初级保健中痴呆症筛查的风险和获益:印第安纳大学认知健康结局比较痴呆症筛查效果研究(IU CHOICE)试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):535-543. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16247. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures for acute and chronic pain: current knowledge and future directions.患者报告的急性和慢性疼痛结局测量指标:现有知识和未来方向。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):616-622. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000780.
6
Using patient reported outcomes in diabetes research and practice: Recommendations from a national workshop.在糖尿病研究和实践中使用患者报告结局:来自国家研讨会的建议。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jul;153:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Beyond methods to applied research: Realizing the vision of PROMIS®.超越应用研究方法:实现 PROMIS® 的愿景。
Health Psychol. 2019 May;38(5):347-350. doi: 10.1037/hea0000752.
8
Screening Positive for Cognitive Impairment: Impact on Healthcare Utilization and Provider Action in Primary and Specialty Care Practices.认知障碍筛查呈阳性:对初级保健和专科保健实践中的医疗利用和提供者行为的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1746-1751. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4606-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Using Informant and Performance Screening Methods to Detect Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.运用 informant 和表现筛查方法检测轻度认知障碍和痴呆症。
Curr Geriatr Rep. 2018 Mar;7(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s13670-018-0236-2. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
10
Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS).阿尔茨海默病中心神经心理学测试电池的第 3 版(UDS)在统一数据集中。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2018 Jan-Mar;32(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000223.

使用患者报告的结果来提高认知障碍和痴呆的检测:快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)患者版。

Using a patient-reported outcome to improve detection of cognitive impairment and dementia: The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).

机构信息

Comprehensive Center for Brain Health, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240422. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240422
PMID:33057404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7561106/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Community detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) is a challenge. While Gold Standard assessments are commonly used in research centers, these methods are time consuming, require extensive training, and are not practical in most clinical settings or in community-based research projects. Many of these methods require an informant (e.g., spouse, adult child) to provide ratings of the patients' cognitive and functional abilities. A patient-reported outcome that captures the presence of cognitive impairment and corresponds to Gold Standard assessments could improve case ascertainment, clinical care, and recruitment into clinical research. We tested the patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) as a patient-reported outcome to detect MCI and ADRD.

METHODS

The patient QDRS was validated in a sample of 261 consecutive patient-caregiver dyads compared with the informant version of the QDRS, the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), neuropsychological tests, and Gold Standard measures of function, behavior, and mood. Psychometric properties including item variability, floor and ceiling effects, construct, concurrent, and known-groups validity, and internal consistency were determined.

RESULTS

The patient QDRS strongly correlated with Gold Standard measures of cognition, function, mood, behavior, and global staging methods (p-values < .001) and had strong psychometric properties with excellent data quality and internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.923, 95%CI:0.91-0.94). The patient QDRS had excellent agreement with the informant QDRS, the CDR and its sum of boxes (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 9.781-0.876). Receiver operator characteristic curves showed excellent discrimination between normal controls from CDR 0.5 (AUC:0.820;95% CI: 0.74-0.90) and for normal controls from any cognitive impairment (AUC:0.885;95% CI: 0.83-0.94).

DISCUSSION

The patient QDRS validly and reliably differentiates individuals with and without cognitive impairment and can be completed by patients through all stages of dementia. The patient QDRS is highly correlated with Gold Standard measures of cognitive, function, behavior, and global staging. The patient QDRS provides a rapid method to screen patients for MCI and ADRD in clinical practice, determine study eligibility, improve case ascertainment in community studies.

摘要

简介

轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病(ADRD)的社区检测是一个挑战。虽然金标准评估通常用于研究中心,但这些方法耗时、需要广泛的培训,并且在大多数临床环境或基于社区的研究项目中不切实际。其中许多方法需要一个知情人(例如配偶、成年子女)来评估患者的认知和功能能力。一种可以捕捉认知障碍并与金标准评估相对应的患者报告结果,可以改善病例确定、临床护理和临床研究招募。我们测试了患者版快速痴呆评定量表(QDRS)作为一种患者报告结果,以检测 MCI 和 ADRD。

方法

在 261 例连续的患者-照护者配对样本中,对患者版 QDRS 进行了验证,与 QDRS 的知情人版本、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)、神经心理学测试以及功能、行为和情绪的金标准测量方法进行了比较。确定了计量学特性,包括项目变异性、地板和天花板效应、结构、同时和已知群体有效性以及内部一致性。

结果

患者 QDRS 与认知、功能、情绪、行为和总体分期方法的金标准测量方法高度相关(p 值<0.001),并且具有出色的计量学特性,数据质量和内部一致性都很好(Cronbach 阿尔法=0.923,95%CI:0.91-0.94)。患者 QDRS 与知情人 QDRS、CDR 及其盒数总和具有极好的一致性(内类相关系数:9.781-0.876)。受试者工作特征曲线显示出极好的区分 CDR 0.5 的正常对照和任何认知障碍的正常对照的能力(AUC:0.820;95%CI:0.74-0.90)和任何认知障碍的正常对照(AUC:0.885;95%CI:0.83-0.94)。

讨论

患者 QDRS 可有效可靠地区分有认知障碍和无认知障碍的个体,并且可以在痴呆的所有阶段由患者完成。患者 QDRS 与认知、功能、行为和总体分期的金标准测量高度相关。患者 QDRS 为临床实践中筛查 MCI 和 ADRD 患者、确定研究资格、提高社区研究中的病例确定提供了一种快速方法。