Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Place B119, Aurora, CO, United States.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Place B119, Aurora, CO, United States.
Environ Res. 2019 Feb;169:297-307. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.019. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
As societies adopt green building practices to reduce energy expenditures and emissions that contribute to climate change, it is important to consider how such building design changes influence health. These practices typically focus on reducing air exchange rates between the building interior and the outdoor environment to minimize energy loss, the health effects of which are not well characterized. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between air exchange rates and respiratory health in a multi-ethnic population living in low-income, urban homes.
The Colorado Home Energy Efficiency and Respiratory Health (CHEER) study is a cross-sectional study that enrolled 302 people in 216 non-smoking, low-income single-family homes, duplexes and town-homes from Colorado's Northern Front Range. A blower door test was conducted and the annual average air exchange rate (AAER) was estimated for each home. Respiratory health was assessed using a structured questionnaire based on standard instruments. We estimated the association between AAER and respiratory symptoms, adjusting for relevant confounders.
Air exchange rates in many homes were high compared to prior studies (median 0.54 air changes per hour, range 0.10, 2.17). Residents in homes with higher AAER were more likely to report chronic cough, asthma and asthma-like symptoms, including taking medication for wheeze, wheeze that limited activities and dry cough at night. Allergic symptoms were not associated with AAER in any models. The association between AAER and asthma-like symptoms was stronger for households located in areas with high potential exposure to traffic related pollutants, but this was not consistent across all health outcomes.
While prior studies have highlighted the potential hazards of low ventilation rates in residences, this study suggests high ventilation rates in single-family homes, duplexes and town-homes in urban areas may also have negative impacts on respiratory health, possibly due to the infiltration of outdoor pollutants.
随着社会采用绿色建筑实践来减少导致气候变化的能源支出和排放,考虑这些建筑设计变化如何影响健康变得尤为重要。这些实践通常侧重于降低建筑物内部与室外环境之间的空气交换率,以最大程度地减少能源损失,但人们对其健康影响还没有很好的认识。本研究旨在评估在居住于城市低收入住房的多民族人群中,空气交换率与呼吸健康之间的关系。
科罗拉多州家庭能源效率和呼吸健康(CHEER)研究是一项横断面研究,共纳入 302 名不吸烟的低收入单户住宅、复式住宅和联排别墅居民,他们来自科罗拉多州北部前岭的 216 户家庭。对每所住宅进行了 blower door 测试,并估算了其年平均空气交换率(AAER)。采用基于标准工具的结构化问卷评估呼吸健康。我们在调整了相关混杂因素后,估计了 AAER 与呼吸症状之间的关联。
与先前的研究相比,许多住宅的空气交换率较高(中位数为 0.54 空气交换/小时,范围为 0.10-2.17)。空气交换率较高的住宅居民更有可能报告慢性咳嗽、哮喘和哮喘样症状,包括因喘息而服用药物、因喘息而限制活动以及夜间干咳。在任何模型中,过敏症状都与 AAER 无关。对于位于交通相关污染物潜在暴露水平较高地区的家庭,AAER 与哮喘样症状之间的关联更强,但并非所有健康结果都如此。
虽然先前的研究强调了住宅低通风率的潜在危害,但本研究表明,城市地区单户住宅、复式住宅和联排别墅的高通风率也可能对呼吸健康产生负面影响,这可能是由于室外污染物的渗透。