• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从快速推荐到在线偏好敏感决策支持:重度主动脉瓣狭窄的案例

From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Dowie Jack, Kaltoft Mette Kjer

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.

出版信息

Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;6(4):109. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040109.

DOI:10.3390/medsci6040109
PMID:30501062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6313661/
Abstract

The launch of 'Rapid Recommendations' by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) group, in collaboration with Making GRADE the Irresistible Choice (MAGIC) and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), is a very interesting recent development in e-healthcare. Designed to respond quickly to developments that have created new decision situations, their first project resulted from the arrival of minimally invasive Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR), for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The interactive MAGIC decision aid that accompanies a Rapid Recommendation and is the main route to its clinical implementation, represents a major advance in e-health, for a cardiovascular decision in this case. However, it needs to go further in order to facilitate fully person-centred care, where the weighted preferences of the individual person are elicited at the point of decision, and transparently integrated with the best (most personalised) estimates of option performances, to produce personalised, preference-sensitive option evaluations. This can be achieved by inputting the collated GRADE evidence on the criteria relevant in the TAVI/SAVR choice into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-based decision support tool, generating a personalised, preference-sensitive opinion. A demonstration version of this add-on to the MAGIC aid, divested of recommendations, is available online as proof of method.

摘要

推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)小组与让GRADE成为不可抗拒的选择(MAGIC)及《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)合作推出的“快速推荐”,是电子医疗保健领域近期一项非常有趣的进展。其旨在迅速应对那些产生新决策情况的发展变化,首个项目源于微创经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)作为有症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)替代方案的出现。伴随快速推荐并作为其临床实施主要途径的交互式MAGIC决策辅助工具,就这种心血管决策而言,代表了电子医疗领域的一项重大进步。然而,它需要进一步发展,以促进完全以患者为中心的医疗,即在决策时引出个人的加权偏好,并将其与选项表现的最佳(最个性化)估计透明地整合起来,以产生个性化的、偏好敏感的选项评估。这可以通过将整理好的关于TAVI/SAVR选择相关标准的GRADE证据输入基于多标准决策分析的决策支持工具来实现,从而生成个性化的、偏好敏感的意见。作为方法验证,MAGIC辅助工具这个附加组件的一个演示版本已在线提供,其中没有推荐内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/23b481143391/medsci-06-00109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/04d17ea8de9f/medsci-06-00109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/e2e3830c5105/medsci-06-00109-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/23b481143391/medsci-06-00109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/04d17ea8de9f/medsci-06-00109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/e2e3830c5105/medsci-06-00109-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/6313661/23b481143391/medsci-06-00109-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis.从快速推荐到在线偏好敏感决策支持:重度主动脉瓣狭窄的案例
Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;6(4):109. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040109.
2
Strong Recommendations Are Inappropriate in Person-Centred Care: The Case of Anti-Platelet Therapy.在以患者为中心的医疗中,强烈推荐并不合适:以抗血小板治疗为例。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Jul 4;262:110-113. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190029.
3
4
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4556.
6
Clinical outcomes of heart-team-guided treatment decisions in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis in a health-economic context with limited resources for transcatheter valve therapies.在经导管瓣膜治疗资源有限的卫生经济背景下,心脏团队指导高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗决策的临床结果。
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Dec;74(6):489-498. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1522461. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危外科手术风险人群的成本效益比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;294:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Comparison of Survival of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Low-Risk Patients Without Coronary Artery Disease.比较无冠状动脉疾病的低危主动脉瓣狭窄患者经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的生存情况。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;125(4):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Determinants in treatment decision-making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄老年患者治疗决策的决定因素
Maturitas. 2015 Sep;82(1):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Comparison of Valve Durability and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Less-Than-High-Risk for Surgery.严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险较低的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的瓣膜耐久性和结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1202-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Transformation in the Diagnostics and Therapy of Cardiovascular Diseases: Comprehensive Literature Review.心血管疾病诊断与治疗中的数字转型:综合文献综述
JMIR Cardio. 2023 Aug 30;7:e44983. doi: 10.2196/44983.
2
What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making.对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者来说,在选择治疗方法时最重要的是什么?为共同决策进行对话框架的构建。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0270209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270209. eCollection 2022.
3
e-Health in Cardiovascular Medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference-Sensitive Apomediative Decision Support Is Key to Facilitating Self-Produced Health.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;255:132-136.
2
The Future of Health Is Self-Production and Co-Creation Based on Apomediative Decision Support.基于辅助性决策支持的健康未来在于自我生产与共同创造。
Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Aug 22;6(3):66. doi: 10.3390/medsci6030066.
3
Separating Risk Assessment from Risk Management Poses Legal and Ethical Problems in Person-Centred Care.在以患者为中心的护理中,将风险评估与风险管理分开会引发法律和伦理问题。
心血管医学中的电子健康
Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;7(6):72. doi: 10.3390/medsci7060072.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:23-26.
4
Risk Thresholds and Risk Classifications Pose Problems for Person-Centred Care.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:19-22.
5
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.卫生系统和公共卫生决策中的 GRADE 证据决策(EtD)框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2.
6
Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review.患者对经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的价值观和偏好:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e014327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014327.
7
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis.低中风险重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5130.
8
Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe, symptomatic, aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk: a clinical practice guideline.低至中度手术风险的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术:临床实践指南
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5085. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5085.
9
Making evidence based medicine work for individual patients.让循证医学服务于个体患者。
BMJ. 2016 May 16;353:i2452. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2452.
10
Factors influencing the decision of older adults to be assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An exploratory study.影响老年人决定接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术评估的因素:一项探索性研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Dec;15(7):486-494. doi: 10.1177/1474515115612927. Epub 2015 Oct 23.