Nakashima Yuichiro, Saeki Hiroshi, Hu Qingjiang, Tsuda Yasuo, Hisamatsu Yuichi, Ando Koji, Oki Eiji, Maehara Yoshihiko
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
Anticancer Res. 2018 Dec;38(12):6809-6814. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13053.
To confirm the superiority of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) over neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
A total of 298 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were initially enrolled; 62 patients received NAC and 236 patients received NACRT. Propensity score matching was applied to create a study cohort.
Postoperative 30-day mortality rate, overall postoperative complication rate, and overall survival time did not differ between those groups. Complete pathological response occurred in one patient treated with NAC and 16 treated with NACRT (p<0.001). In patients with borderline-resectable T4 disease, overall survival was superior in the NACRT group compared to that in the NAC group (p=0.040).
No survival advantage was observed between NAC and NACRT groups. Limited to patients with borderline-resectable T4, NACRT achieved a higher rate of primary tumor volume reduction and R0 resection, and a more favorable prognosis compared to NAC.
证实新辅助放化疗(NACRT)相对于新辅助化疗(NAC)作为局部晚期食管癌术前治疗的优越性。
最初纳入298例可切除食管癌患者;62例接受NAC,236例接受NACRT。应用倾向评分匹配法建立研究队列。
两组术后30天死亡率、总体术后并发症发生率和总生存时间无差异。1例接受NAC治疗的患者和16例接受NACRT治疗的患者出现完全病理缓解(p<0.001)。在边界可切除的T4期疾病患者中,NACRT组的总生存期优于NAC组(p=0.040)。
NAC组和NACRT组之间未观察到生存优势。仅对于边界可切除的T4期患者,与NAC相比,NACRT实现了更高的原发肿瘤体积缩小率和R0切除率,且预后更优。