• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于光学相干断层扫描的数字化监测诊室与医院眼科随访对屏幕阳性黄斑病变患者的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with screen-positive maculopathy.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Gloucestershire Retinal Research Group, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2019 Apr;33(4):640-647. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0297-7. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-018-0297-7
PMID:30504828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6461849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Annually 2.7 million individuals are offered screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in England. Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) has the potential to relieve pressure on NHS services by correctly identifying patients who are screen positive for maculopathy on two-dimensional photography without evidence of clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO), limiting the number of referrals to hospitals. We aim to assess whether the addition of SDOCT imaging in digital surveillance clinics is a cost-effective intervention relative to hospital eye service (HES) follow-up.

METHODS

We used patient-level data from the Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Service linked to the local digital surveillance programme and HES between 2012 and 2015. A model was used to simulate the progression of individuals with background diabetic retinopathy (R1) and diabetic maculopathy (M1) following DR screening across the clinic pathways over 12 months.

RESULTS

Between January 2012 and December 2014, 696 people undergoing DR screening were found to have screen-positive maculopathy in at least one eye for the first time, with a total of 766 eyes identified as having R1M1. The mean annual cost of assessing and surveillance through the SD-OCT clinic pathway was £101 (95% CI: 91-139) as compared with £177 (95%CI: 164-219) under the HES pathway. Surveillance under an SD-OCT clinic generated cost savings of £76 (95% CI: 70-81) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that SD-OCT surveillance of patients diagnosed as R1M1 at DR screening is not only cost-effective but generates considerable cost savings.

摘要

背景

在英格兰,每年有 270 万人接受糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)筛查。谱域光相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)有可能通过正确识别二维摄影检查阳性但无临床显著黄斑水肿(CSMO)的黄斑病变患者,从而缓解国民保健服务(NHS)的压力,限制转诊至医院的人数。我们旨在评估在数字监测诊所中添加 SD-OCT 成像相对于医院眼科服务(HES)随访是否是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。

方法

我们使用了 2012 年至 2015 年期间格洛斯特郡糖尿病眼病筛查服务的患者水平数据,这些数据与当地数字监测计划和 HES 相关联。我们使用模型来模拟 DR 筛查后患有背景性糖尿病性视网膜病变(R1)和糖尿病性黄斑病变(M1)的个体在 12 个月内通过不同诊所途径的进展情况。

结果

2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月,共有 696 名接受 DR 筛查的人首次发现一只或多只眼中有筛检阳性的黄斑病变,共有 766 只眼被确定为 R1M1。与 HES 途径相比,通过 SD-OCT 诊所途径评估和监测的年平均成本为 101 英镑(95%置信区间:91-139),而通过 HES 途径的成本为 177 英镑(95%置信区间:164-219)。通过 SD-OCT 诊所进行监测可为每位患者节省 76 英镑(95%置信区间:70-81)的费用。

结论

我们的分析表明,对在 DR 筛查中诊断为 R1M1 的患者进行 SD-OCT 监测不仅具有成本效益,而且还可以节省大量成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4129/6461849/9ca93a023f33/41433_2018_297_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4129/6461849/ccafd82365e8/41433_2018_297_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4129/6461849/9ca93a023f33/41433_2018_297_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4129/6461849/ccafd82365e8/41433_2018_297_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4129/6461849/9ca93a023f33/41433_2018_297_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with screen-positive maculopathy.基于光学相干断层扫描的数字化监测诊室与医院眼科随访对屏幕阳性黄斑病变患者的成本效益比较。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Apr;33(4):640-647. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0297-7. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy.光学相干断层扫描(OCT)用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变患者的黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD008081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008081.pub2.
3
Are we making good use of our public resources? The false-positive rate of screening by fundus photography for diabetic macular oedema.我们是否在充分利用公共资源?眼底照相筛查糖尿病性黄斑水肿的假阳性率。
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Aug;23(4):356-64. doi: 10.12809/hkmj166078. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
SDOCT imaging to identify macular pathology in patients diagnosed with diabetic maculopathy by a digital photographic retinal screening programme.利用 SDOCT 成像来识别通过数码摄影视网膜筛查项目诊断为糖尿病性黄斑病变的患者的黄斑病变。
PLoS One. 2011 May 6;6(5):e14811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014811.
5
Evaluation of a combination digital retinal camera with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) that might be used for the screening of diabetic retinopathy with telemedicine: A pilot study.一种组合式数码视网膜相机与频域光相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)联合应用于远程医疗糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的评价:一项初步研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2018 Nov;32(11):1046-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
6
A health economic pilot study comparing two diabetic retinopathy screening strategies.一项健康经济学试点研究比较了两种糖尿病视网膜病变筛查策略。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 6;14(1):15618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66405-2.
7
Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.单一地区验光与数码摄影筛查糖尿病视网膜病变的比较
Eye (Lond). 2004 Jan;18(1):3-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700497.
8
Improving the cost-effectiveness of photographic screening for diabetic macular oedema: a prospective, multi-centre, UK study.提高糖尿病性黄斑水肿摄影筛查的成本效益:一项前瞻性、多中心、英国研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1042-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304338. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Diabetic maculopathy: multicolour and SD-OCT versus fundus photography.糖尿病性黄斑病变:多色光与频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)对比眼底照相
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 19;6(1):e000514. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000514. eCollection 2021.
10
An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.一项观察性研究,旨在评估糖尿病视网膜病变图像自动评估软件是否可以取代手动图像分级的一个或多个步骤,并确定其成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Dec;20(92):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta20920.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote Monitoring of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusions Treated with Anti-VEGF: A Pilot Study.抗VEGF治疗的视网膜静脉阻塞患者的远程监测:一项初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2330. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072330.
2
Hospital to community in Wales: What is the value of optometrists playing a greater role in managing neovascular AMD and glaucoma in primary care?威尔士从医院到社区:验光师在初级医疗中对新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性和青光眼管理发挥更大作用的价值是什么?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Jan;45(1):280-293. doi: 10.1111/opo.13397. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
3
A health economic pilot study comparing two diabetic retinopathy screening strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of Community versus Hospital Eye Service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease (ECHoES): a virtual randomised balanced incomplete block trial.社区与医院眼科服务对静止期新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者进行随访的有效性、成本效益及可接受性研究(ECHoES):一项虚拟随机平衡不完全区组试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(80):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta20800.
2
Development of a cost-effectiveness model for optimisation of the screening interval in diabetic retinopathy screening.开发用于优化糖尿病视网膜病变筛查间隔的成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Sep;19(74):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta19740.
3
一项健康经济学试点研究比较了两种糖尿病视网膜病变筛查策略。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 6;14(1):15618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66405-2.
4
Digital innovations for retinal care in diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变中的视网膜护理数字创新。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Dec;59(12):1521-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01941-9. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
5
Update on Current and Future Management for Diabetic Maculopathy.糖尿病性黄斑病变的当前及未来管理进展
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Apr;11(2):489-502. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00460-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
A Multitask Deep-Learning System to Classify Diabetic Macular Edema for Different Optical Coherence Tomography Devices: A Multicenter Analysis.一种用于对不同光学相干断层扫描设备的糖尿病性黄斑水肿进行分类的多任务深度学习系统:一项多中心分析。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Sep;44(9):2078-2088. doi: 10.2337/dc20-3064. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
7
The contribution of the English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme to reductions in diabetes-related blindness, comparisons within Europe, and future challenges.英国国民保健制度糖尿病眼病筛查计划对减少与糖尿病相关的失明的贡献、欧洲内部的比较以及未来的挑战。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Apr;58(4):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01687-w. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
8
Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Patients with Diabetes Using a Handheld Fundus Camera: The Experience from the South-Eastern Region in Hungary.匈牙利东南部地区使用手持式眼底相机对糖尿病患者进行糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的经验。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Feb 5;2021:6646645. doi: 10.1155/2021/6646645. eCollection 2021.
9
Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society, and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Dated August 2019.德国眼科学会、德国视网膜学会和德国眼科医生专业协会关于糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗的声明:日期为2019年8月。
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jan;118(Suppl 1):40-67. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01244-w.
10
Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group.糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿的诊治途径:英国共识工作组。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Jun;34(Suppl 1):1-51. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0961-6.
The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84).
糖尿病相关并发症对医疗费用的影响:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS 84)的新结果。
Diabet Med. 2015 Apr;32(4):459-66. doi: 10.1111/dme.12647. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Improving the cost-effectiveness of photographic screening for diabetic macular oedema: a prospective, multi-centre, UK study.提高糖尿病性黄斑水肿摄影筛查的成本效益:一项前瞻性、多中心、英国研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1042-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304338. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16-64 years), 1999-2000 with 2009-2010.1999 - 2000年与2009 - 2010年英格兰和威尔士工作年龄成年人(16 - 64岁)失明认证原因的比较。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 12;4(2):e004015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004015.
6
Antiangiogenic therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor modalities for diabetic macular oedema.采用抗血管内皮生长因子疗法治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的抗血管生成治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD007419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007419.pub3.
7
SDOCT imaging to identify macular pathology in patients diagnosed with diabetic maculopathy by a digital photographic retinal screening programme.利用 SDOCT 成像来识别通过数码摄影视网膜筛查项目诊断为糖尿病性黄斑病变的患者的黄斑病变。
PLoS One. 2011 May 6;6(5):e14811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014811.
8
Correlation between fluorescein angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of cystoid macular edema.荧光素血管造影与频域光相干断层扫描在诊断囊样黄斑水肿中的相关性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;94(9):1197-200. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.170589. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
Compliance with the quality standards of National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Committee.符合国家糖尿病视网膜病变筛查委员会的质量标准。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2009 May;3(2):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
10
Lifetime costs of complications resulting from type 2 diabetes in the U.S.美国2型糖尿病并发症的终身成本
Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):476-81. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.476.