Cornell University, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2019 Apr;11(2):173-184. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12725. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
We examined the impacts of soil moisture, temperature, agricultural management and habitat type on the degradation dynamics of eDNA in soils. Synthetic eDNA was added to soil microcosms, and its disappearance over time was measured using both high-throughput sequencing and qPCR. The synthetic eDNA was degraded rapidly, but a small fraction remained detectable throughout the experiments (39-80 days). The eDNA degradation rate was positively correlated with moisture and temperature, but negatively correlated with soil organic carbon content. End-point stabilization of eDNA was highest at low moisture and temperature, but exhibited no relationship with soil organic carbon. Tilled soils had higher rates of degradation and less stabilization than no-till soils. Among different habitats we observed that forest soils had the slowest degradation rate, and meadow soils had the greatest stabilization of eDNA. While eDNA was detectable by qPCR in all treatments across all time-points, it became inconsistently detectable with high-throughput gene sequencing in less than 1 week. We conclude that eDNA degradation and stabilization dynamics vary with moisture, temperature and habitat characteristics, that small amounts of eDNA may persist in soils indefinitely, and that the ability of persistent eDNA to impact microbial community estimates depends on method sensitivity and experimental objectives.
我们研究了土壤水分、温度、农业管理和生境类型对土壤中 eDNA 降解动态的影响。将合成的 eDNA 添加到土壤微宇宙中,并用高通量测序和 qPCR 测量其随时间的消失情况。合成的 eDNA 降解迅速,但在整个实验过程中仍有一小部分可检测到(39-80 天)。eDNA 降解率与水分和温度呈正相关,但与土壤有机碳含量呈负相关。eDNA 的终点稳定在低水分和温度下最高,但与土壤有机碳无关。耕作土壤的降解率高于免耕土壤,而稳定率低于免耕土壤。在不同的生境中,我们观察到森林土壤的降解率最慢,而草地土壤的 eDNA 稳定性最大。虽然在所有处理和所有时间点都可以通过 qPCR 检测到 eDNA,但在不到 1 周的时间内,高通量基因测序就无法检测到 eDNA。我们得出结论,eDNA 的降解和稳定动态随水分、温度和生境特征而变化,少量的 eDNA 可能在土壤中无限期存在,而持久的 eDNA 对微生物群落估计的影响取决于方法的灵敏度和实验目标。