Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Lab, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Section, University of Siena, Italy.
Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(4):1341-1362. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180549.
Comforts in modern society have generally been associated with longer survival rates, enabling individuals to reach advanced age as never before in history. With the increase in longevity, however, the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer's disease, has also doubled. Nevertheless, most of the observed variance, in terms of time of clinical diagnosis and progression, often remains striking. Only recently, differences in the social, educational and occupational background of the individual, as proxies of cognitive reserve (CR), have been hypothesized to play a role in accounting for such discrepancies. CR is a well-established concept in literature; lots of studies have been conducted in trying to better understand its underlying neural substrates and associated biomarkers, resulting in an incredible amount of data being produced. Here, we aimed to summarize recent relevant published work addressing the issue, gathering evidence for the existence of a common path across research efforts that might ease future investigations by providing a general perspective on the actual state of the arts. An innovative model is hereby proposed, addressing the role of CR across structural and functional evidences, as well as the potential implementation of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in the causal validation of such theoretical frame.
现代社会的舒适条件通常与更高的存活率相关联,使人们能够达到历史上前所未有的高龄。然而,随着寿命的延长,神经退行性疾病的发病率,特别是阿尔茨海默病的发病率也增加了一倍。尽管如此,在临床诊断和进展的时间方面,大多数观察到的差异仍然非常显著。直到最近,个体的社会、教育和职业背景差异(作为认知储备 (CR) 的代表)才被假设在解释这些差异方面发挥作用。CR 是文献中一个成熟的概念;为了更好地理解其潜在的神经基质和相关生物标志物,已经进行了大量的研究,产生了大量的数据。在这里,我们旨在总结最近发表的相关研究工作,以解决这个问题,为研究工作中存在的共同途径提供证据,通过提供对现有技术的一般看法,为未来的研究提供便利。在此提出了一个创新的模型,解决了 CR 在结构和功能证据方面的作用,以及在这种理论框架的因果验证中应用非侵入性脑刺激技术的可能性。