School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 3;13(12):e0208104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208104. eCollection 2018.
The process of rice domestication has been studied for decades based on changing morphological characteristics in assemblages of both macroremains, such as charred seeds and spikelet bases, and microremains, such as phytoliths, esp. bulliform and double-peaked phytoliths. The applicability of these indicators in determining if a specific assemblage is wild or domesticated, however, is rarely discussed. To understand the significance of these indicators in the determination of domestication, we collected 38 archaeological samples from eight Neolithic sites, dating from 10-2ka BP, in the lower Yangtze River region to analyze and compare the changes of these different indicators over eight thousand years. The data demonstrate that the comprehensive analysis of multiple indicators may be the best method to study the process of rice domestication developed thus far. An assemblage of rice remains can be identified as domesticated forms if they meet the following criteria simultaneously: 1) the proportion of domesticated-type bulliform phytoliths is more than 73%; and 2) the proportion of domesticated-type rice spikelet bases is higher than 75%. Furthermore, we found that each indicator tends to change steadily and gradually over time, and each stabilized at a different time, suggesting that the characteristics of domesticated rice developed slowly and successively. Changes of multiple indicators during the period between 10,000-2,000 yr BP indicate that the process of rice domestication in the lower Yangtze River region lasted as long as ca. 6,000 years during the Neolithic, and can be divided into three stages with the turning points in the middle Hemudu-late Majiabang culture (6,500-5,800yr BP) and the late Liangzhu culture (4,600-4,300yr BP).
水稻驯化过程已经基于宏观遗存(如炭化种子和小穗轴)和微观遗存(如植硅体,尤其是泡状和双峰型植硅体)组合的形态特征变化进行了几十年的研究。然而,这些指标在确定特定遗存是野生的还是驯化的方面的适用性却很少被讨论。为了了解这些指标在确定驯化方面的意义,我们从长江下游地区的 8 个新石器时代遗址收集了 38 个考古样本,时间跨度从 10,000 年前到 2,000 年前,分析和比较了这些不同指标在 8000 年中的变化。数据表明,综合分析多个指标可能是迄今为止研究水稻驯化过程的最佳方法。如果一组水稻遗存同时满足以下标准,则可认定为驯化形式:1)驯化型泡状植硅体的比例超过 73%;2)驯化型水稻小穗轴的比例高于 75%。此外,我们发现每个指标的变化趋势都是稳定且逐渐的,并且每个指标在不同的时间达到稳定,这表明驯化水稻的特征是缓慢而逐步发展的。10,000-2,000 年前期间多个指标的变化表明,长江下游地区的水稻驯化过程在新石器时代持续了大约 6000 年,可以分为三个阶段,转折点在河姆渡晚期-马家浜文化(6500-5800 年前)和良渚文化晚期(4600-4300 年前)。