Mogensen Christian Backer, Vilhelmsen Malene Bue, Jepsen Johanne, Boye Lilian Keene, Persson Maiken Hjuler, Skyum Florence
Emergency Department, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Kresten Philipsensvej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark.
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0202-5.
A new generation of ear thermometers with preheated tips and several measurements points should allow a more precise temperature measurement. The aim of the study was to evaluate if the ear temperature measured by this ear thermometer can be used to screen for fever and whether the thermometer is in agreement with the rectal temperature and if age, use of hearing devices or time after admission influences the temperature measurements.
Open cross-sectional clinical single site study patients, > 18 years old, who were acutely admitted to the short stay unit at the ED. A sample size of 99 patient per subgroup was recruited as random convenience series. As ear thermometer Braun Thermoscan Pro 4000® and as rectal thermometer Omron Flex Temp Smart ® was used. For different cut off of temperature the AUC was calculated and Bland-Altman analysis for calculation of 95% limits of agreement with rectal temperature, with subgroup analysis concerning age, time span from admission time and use of hearing aid.
Among 599 patients the sensitivity to detect fever with an ear thermometer varied between 68 and 70% with AUC from 0.88-0.97. If the ear temperature was ≥37.5 oC, the sensitivity to detect patients with ≥38.0 oC rectally was 95% which raised to 100% for a rectal temperature of ≥38.3 oC. For the ear thermometer's ability to determine the exact temperature the 95% limits of agreement were +/- 0.8 oC. with no influence from age, duration of hospital stay or hearing aids.
The examined ear thermometer is able to detect fever, defined as ≥38 oC rectally in an adult ED population by using an ear cut-point of 37.5 oC, but not to measure the exact temperature. Used in this way around a fifth of the patients will still be in need of a rectal temperature measurement, but less than 5% with fever ≥38.0 oC will remain undetected and none with fever ≥38.3 oC. Age, admission time and use of hearing aid did not influence the temperature measurements.
Clinical Trials: ID NCT02977481 , date 11/18/2016.
新一代带有预热探头和多个测量点的耳温计应能实现更精确的体温测量。本研究的目的是评估用这种耳温计测量的耳温是否可用于发热筛查,该体温计与直肠温度是否一致,以及年龄、是否使用听力设备或入院后的时间是否会影响体温测量。
对年龄大于18岁、急性入住急诊科短期留观病房的患者进行开放性横断面临床单中心研究。每个亚组招募99例患者作为随机便利样本。使用博朗耳温计Thermoscan Pro 4000®作为耳温计,欧姆龙智能体温计Flex Temp Smart®作为直肠体温计。针对不同的体温临界值计算曲线下面积(AUC),并采用布兰德-奥特曼分析计算与直肠温度的95%一致性界限,同时进行年龄、入院时间跨度和助听器使用情况的亚组分析。
在599例患者中,耳温计检测发热的敏感性在68%至70%之间,AUC为0.88 - 0.97。如果耳温≥37.5℃,直肠温度≥38.0℃的患者检测敏感性为95%,直肠温度≥38.3℃时敏感性升至100%。对于耳温计确定准确体温的能力,95%一致性界限为±0.8℃,不受年龄、住院时间或助听器的影响。
所检测的耳温计能够通过使用37.5℃的耳温切点来检测成人急诊科患者中直肠温度≥38℃定义的发热,但不能测量准确体温。以这种方式使用时,约五分之一的患者仍需要测量直肠温度,但发热≥38.0℃的患者中未被检测到的不到5%,发热≥38.3℃的患者无一漏诊。年龄、入院时间和助听器使用情况均不影响体温测量。
临床试验:ID NCT02977481,日期2016年11月18日。