• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌手术后的身体活动、功能能力和生活质量。

Physical activity, functional ability, and quality of life after breast cancer surgery.

机构信息

Translational Surgery Graduate Program and Division of Plastic Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 740 - 2nd floor, Vila Clementino, CEP: 04023-062 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Translational Surgery Graduate Program and Division of Plastic Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu, 740 - 2nd floor, Vila Clementino, CEP: 04023-062 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Mar;72(3):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.029
PMID:30509735
Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the influence of different surgical treatment modalities on the level of physical activity, functional capacity, and quality of life of breast cancer survivors. One hundred eighty women aged 30-60 years old were selected and allocated to control group (CG, women without breast cancer, n = 45), breast-conserving surgery group (BCG, n = 45), mastectomy group (MG, n = 45), and breast reconstruction group (BRG, n = 45). Physical activity, functional capacity, and quality of life were assessed, respectively, using the following self-report questionnaires validated for use in Brazil: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-20), and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The groups were homogeneous relative to sociodemographic variables. The scores for physical activity (IPAQ) did not differ between CG and BRG, whereas they were better for CG than for BCG and MG (p = 0.0270). The results for functional capacity (HAQ-20) were better for CG than for MG (p = 0.0450), with no difference between the remaining groups. Differences were found for the SF-36 domains "physical functioning" (p < 0.01), "physical role functioning" (p < 0.001), "emotional role functioning" (p = 0.0174), and "general health" (p = 0.0307). CG and BRG differed significantly relative to the domains "physical role functioning" and "emotional role functioning" only. We concluded that patients who underwent breast reconstruction exhibited higher levels of physical activity and quality of life than patients subjected to mastectomy alone or breast-conserving surgery.

摘要

这项横断面研究旨在评估不同手术治疗方式对乳腺癌幸存者身体活动水平、功能能力和生活质量的影响。选择了 180 名 30-60 岁的女性,分为对照组(CG,无乳腺癌女性,n=45)、保乳手术组(BCG,n=45)、乳房切除术组(MG,n=45)和乳房重建组(BRG,n=45)。分别使用经过巴西验证的以下自我报告问卷评估身体活动、功能能力和生活质量:国际身体活动问卷(IPAQ)、斯坦福健康评估问卷(HAQ-20)和医疗结果研究 36 项简明健康调查(SF-36)。组间在社会人口统计学变量方面具有同质性。CG 和 BRG 的身体活动(IPAQ)评分没有差异,而 CG 优于 BCG 和 MG(p=0.0270)。CG 的功能能力(HAQ-20)评分优于 MG(p=0.0450),其余组之间无差异。SF-36 各领域存在差异,包括“身体功能”(p<0.01)、“身体角色功能”(p<0.001)、“情感角色功能”(p=0.0174)和“一般健康”(p=0.0307)。CG 和 BRG 在“身体角色功能”和“情感角色功能”两个领域与其他组有显著差异。我们得出结论,接受乳房重建的患者比仅接受乳房切除术或保乳手术的患者具有更高的身体活动水平和生活质量。

相似文献

1
Physical activity, functional ability, and quality of life after breast cancer surgery.乳腺癌手术后的身体活动、功能能力和生活质量。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Mar;72(3):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
Breast Reconstruction May Improve Work Ability and Productivity After Breast Cancer Surgery.乳房重建可能会改善乳腺癌手术后的工作能力和生产力。
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Oct;81(4):398-401. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001562.
3
Comparison of quality of life based on surgical technique in patients with breast cancer.基于手术技术的乳腺癌患者生活质量比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;44(1):22-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt176. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: A case-controlled cohort study.乳腺癌全乳切除术后有或无乳房重建与保乳手术的生活质量:一项病例对照队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Sep;69(9):1184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
5
Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.乳房重建手术在乳腺癌幸存者身体和情感结局中的作用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Sep 6;92(17):1422-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.17.1422.
6
Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the effect of surgery on quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Malaysia.保乳手术与乳房切除术:手术对马来西亚乳腺癌幸存者生活质量的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02738-w.
7
Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌幸存者中乳房重建与全乳房切除术和保乳手术的健康相关生活质量比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer. 2020 Jul;27(4):534-566. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01076-1. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Physical Activity With and Without Arm Sleeves: Compliance and Quality of Life After Breast Cancer Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial.乳腺癌手术后穿与不穿手臂袖套进行体育活动:依从性和生活质量——一项随机对照试验
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Jun;16(3):294-299. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0045. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
9
Evaluation of the quality of life of women treated due to breast cancer using amputation or breast conserving surgery in the early postoperative period.对在术后早期接受乳房切除术或保乳手术治疗的乳腺癌女性患者的生活质量进行评估。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Apr;87(4):174-80. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0040.
10
The impact of demographic factors on quality of life in women after breast cancer surgery.人口因素对乳腺癌手术后女性生活质量的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;24(1):51-58. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_429_19.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with physical activity among Thai women with breast cancer postmastectomy at a university hospital, Thailand: A cross-sectional study.泰国一家大学医院行乳房切除术后的乳腺癌女性患者身体活动的相关因素:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17266. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02137-1.
2
Biofeedback-Based Proprioceptive Training to Improve Functional Prerequisites of Dragon Boating in Breast Cancer Survivors.基于生物反馈的本体感觉训练以改善乳腺癌幸存者龙舟运动的功能前提条件。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 May 11;14(5):1351-1368. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14050089.
3
Use of patient-reported outcome measures after breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
使用患者报告的结局测量在中低收入国家的乳房再造后:一个范围审查。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 28;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00687-y.
4
Assessment of health-related quality of life and its determinants among COVID-19 intensive care unit survivors.新型冠状病毒肺炎重症监护病房幸存者的健康相关生活质量及其决定因素评估
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Dec;12(12):3319-3325. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_739_23. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients.患者评估的大学医院的乳房再造服务质量。
Acta Cir Bras. 2023 May 1;38:e381223. doi: 10.1590/acb381223. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors with and without Persistent Depressive Symptoms: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.乳腺癌幸存者中伴或不伴持续性抑郁症状患者的生活质量比较:一项为期 12 个月的随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043663.
7
Side Bioimpedance Analysis in Menopausal Post-Oncological Breast Cancer.绝经后肿瘤相关性乳腺癌患者的体侧生物电阻抗分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811329.
8
Heterogeneity of symptoms and functions among women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer in China: A multicentre, cross-sectional study.中国接受乳腺癌化疗的女性症状和功能的异质性:一项多中心、横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;10:952710. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952710. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychosocial and sexual well-being in breast cancer survivors undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: The mediating role of breast satisfaction.乳腺癌幸存者即刻乳房重建术后的社会心理和性健康:乳房满意度的中介作用。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13686. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13686. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
10
Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌患者快速心理社会幸福感筛查工具的开发与验证
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Jun 10;9(3):303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.002. eCollection 2022 Jul.